Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs ThreatStryker comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
5th
Ranking in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
114
Ranking in other categories
Cloud and Data Center Security (2nd), Container Security (3rd), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (4th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (3rd), Compliance Management (1st)
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto N...
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
69th
Ranking in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)
25th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (28th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (35th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (24th), Software Supply Chain Security (37th), Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) (15th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (20th), Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) (11th)
ThreatStryker
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
100th
Ranking in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)
42nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Andrew W - PeerSpot reviewer
Tells us about vulnerabilities as well as their impact and helps to focus on real issues
Looking at all the different pieces, it has got everything we need. Some of the pieces we do not even use. For example, we do not have Kubernetes Security. We are not running any K8 clusters, so it is good for us. Overall, we find the solution to be fantastic. There can be additional education components. This may not be truly fair to them because of what the product is going for, but it would be great to see additional education for compliance. It is not a criticism of the tool per se, but anything to help non-development resources understand some of the complexities of the cloud is always appreciated. Any additional educational resources are always helpful for security teams, especially those without a development background.
Use Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks?
Share your opinion
Use ThreatStryker?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) solutions are best for your needs.
866,300 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Performing Arts
17%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business43
Midsize Enterprise21
Large Enterprise53
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?
I don't handle the price part, but it isn't more expensive than Palo Alto Prisma Cloud. It's not cheap, but it is wor...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
There is scope for more application security posture management features. Additionally, the runtime protection needs ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Palo Alto Networks, SentinelOne and others in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP). Updated: August 2025.
866,300 professionals have used our research since 2012.