Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Security Management vs Fortinet FortiManager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
Check Point Security Management boosts efficiency and security by significantly reducing incidents, enhancing returns, and streamlining operations.
Sentiment score
6.3
Fortinet FortiManager offers competitive pricing, comprehensive security, and high returns, despite not showing immediate ROI during deployment stages.
I have seen a return on investment with Check Point Security Management, as my security concerns regarding data production have been greatly diminished, and my time is also saved.
I have seen a strong ROI from using Check Point Security Management through unified policy management, reduced misconfigurations, and faster incident response.
The time to resolve issues is very much better now with Check Point Security Management.
Fortinet provides a strong ROI for organizations focused on comprehensive security.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
Check Point Security Management support is responsive with expertise, but experiences vary by region and engineer experience, needing speed improvements.
Sentiment score
6.8
Fortinet FortiManager support is praised for efficiency, but some users report delays and complex case response time issues.
We have partner support that helps us mitigate vulnerabilities reported by our infrastructure team.
The challenge was with drivers due to the size, and we had not provisioned the partition to the right size.
The customer support for Check Point Security Management is great.
Fortinet's support has proven to be reliable, particularly as we've been engaged with them since the project's initiation.
They are responsive and resolve issues quickly when I raise a ticket.
The level of support for P2 and P1 is wonderful.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Check Point Security Management is praised for scalable efficiency, centralized console management, and adaptability across extensive networks.
Sentiment score
7.3
Fortinet FortiManager offers scalable, centralized management, ideal for expanding Fortinet environments, favoring virtual machines over hardware.
So far, it has been functioning smoothly without any issues in the past 1.5 years.
When you upgrade multiple times, you leave many files that are useless. They are dated, so it's always better to create a new machine every few versions, for example, three or four major versions.
Regarding scalability, I have given the rating of nine out of ten.
You can raise the capacity as you go, and there is no limit for hardware.
If you are working with a private or public cloud, it is very scalable.
The problem is cloud connectivity and roaming profiles are not working, as there is no option for them.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Check Point Security Management is stable, though occasional application crashes and connectivity issues occur, particularly under heavy loads.
Sentiment score
7.9
Fortinet FortiManager is stable and reliable, with minor glitches that require reboots and depend on proper resource allocation.
Check Point Security Management is really stable, and I have not experienced any downtime or issues with reliability except for when we do upgrades.
The SmartConsole used to administrate the security management is somewhat unstable.
In my environment, Check Point Security Management is stable, as I do not see any downtime.
I rate the solution's stability ten out of ten.
95% of the time, there are no problems interacting with other devices.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point Security Management requires usability, performance, compliance improvements, enhanced interoperability, and better customer support for effective use.
Fortinet FortiManager needs better documentation, simplified UI, enhanced integration, and clearer pricing to improve user experience.
As an IT person, I occasionally need to check how much internet bandwidth has been used in the internal network over the past month, day, or week.
I believe they can improve the management by allowing better API functionality because the API now is a little complicated, making it difficult to do automation.
Additionally, it crashes pretty regularly, so they could resolve the stability issues as well.
FortiManager is a good tool, but there is a lack of really advanced documentation.
If you have a couple thousand policies for FortiGate firewalls, it can take a few minutes to receive a response from the remote devices.
In such cases, their CPE or other devices on-site may become unreliable, leading to occasional configuration discrepancies.
 

Setup Cost

Despite high costs, Check Point offers advanced features and strong security, making it valuable for enterprises with complex needs.
Fortinet FortiManager is considered reasonably priced, with potential negotiation, though costs vary with device volume and features.
Since we are using it extensively, we get significant discounts during procurement.
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Check Point Security Management involves a bit of a challenge in pricing, as it is somewhat costlier than previous devices.
Licensing is quite expensive.
Fortinet has the best pricing currently on the market.
It isn't the most expensive solution.
It's neither cheap nor expensive.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Security Management offers centralized control, efficient policy and log management, enhanced security, and seamless integration with systems.
Fortinet FortiManager centralizes management, automates tasks, and enhances network performance with scalability, visibility, and integration features.
Check Point Security Management does not operate like that; it shows the mobile device, tablet, smartphone, laptop, and desktop separately so that I can easily find out how many desktops are connected, how many mobile devices are connected, and I can easily block mobile devices and free up the IPs.
Check Point Security Management has positively impacted my organization by providing centralized control, allowing us to manage all security policies and gateways from a single console, reducing complexity and saving time.
We can't work without Check Point because it provides the real visibility needed to manage the environment.
I can automate the installation of configurations using different programming languages like Python or HPE, and it's a GUI solution, so it's pretty easy to use, even for basic users.
Being able to push consistent firewall rules and configuration changes across multiple FortiGates saves a ton of time and reduces errors compared to managing each device individually.
Without FortiManager, you cannot manage a complex environment across several sites with multiple firewalls.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Security Manage...
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (8th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (11th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (6th)
Fortinet FortiManager
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
Network Management Applications (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Check Point Security Management and Fortinet FortiManager aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Check Point Security Management is designed for Log Management and holds a mindshare of 0.4%, down 0.5% compared to last year.
Fortinet FortiManager, on the other hand, focuses on Network Management Applications, holds 5.2% mindshare, up 4.6% since last year.
Log Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Check Point Security Management0.4%
Wazuh12.6%
Grafana Loki8.1%
Other78.9%
Log Management
Network Management Applications Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Fortinet FortiManager5.2%
Cisco DNA Center22.1%
Cisco Catalyst Center9.5%
Other63.2%
Network Management Applications
 

Featured Reviews

NareshKumar10 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhanced Internal Security and Efficiency
Check Point Security Management can be improved by addressing a negative challenge I face: sometimes it does not show internet utilization in the GUI. When I ask support, they tell me to upgrade the firmware, which happens quite frequently. Since I deployed the device in my on-premises environment 1.5 years ago, I have experienced this issue three times. Check Point Security Management has not impacted my daily work or decision-making in any negative way. As an IT person, I occasionally need to check how much internet bandwidth has been used in the internal network over the past month, day, or week. During those times, when I open the data utilization column, it shows nothing available. Each time this happens, I need to upgrade to the latest version of the firmware, and this frequent updating affects my productivity negatively. If Check Point addresses this issue in the future, it will be beneficial for all customers using Check Point SMBs.
Damitha Anuradha - PeerSpot reviewer
Manage multiple devices with ease but experience complexity in deployment and limited AI features
I use Fortinet FortiManager to manage multiple devices in a single location. Although it does not provide a security posture itself, it depends on the firewall policies and settings in their respective firewalls. Fortinet FortiManager is primarily meant for the management of devices Fortinet…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
866,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business34
Midsize Enterprise30
Large Enterprise41
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business33
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise19
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Security Management?
The most beneficial features for us are the alert classifications, which help us prioritize critical issues, and the detailed reports that provide insights into attack origins and purposes, such as...
What needs improvement with Check Point Security Management?
I see areas of improvement for Check Point Security Management such as GUI stability and performance, and simplified firmware upgrades. I and my colleagues occasionally report glitches or missing d...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Security Management?
My main use case for Check Point Security Management is to unify firewall and threat prevention policies across multiple international sites, so I use SmartConsole to streamline rule updates and mo...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiManager?
The most valuable feature is the centralized management console.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiManager?
The pricing for Fortinet FortiManager is good and not expensive. It is competitively priced.
What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiManager?
There are some aspects that Fortinet FortiManager could improve upon. The user interface can feel clunky, especially for more complex tasks such as managing large-scale policy packages or custom sc...
 

Also Known As

R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hedgetec, Geiger
Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
Find out what your peers are saying about Wazuh, Splunk, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: August 2025.
866,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.