Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Broadcom Payment Security vs SHIELD comparison

Broadcom and SHIELD are both solutions in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category. Broadcom is ranked #31, while SHIELD is ranked #12 with an average rating of 3.0. Broadcom holds a 0.6% mindshare in FDP, compared to SHIELD’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SHIELD users who would recommend it.
Broadcom Payment Security
Read 16 Broadcom Payment Security reviews
  • 255 Views
  • 242 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
SHIELD
Read 1 SHIELD review
  • 385 Views
  • 385 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Broadcom Payment Security and SHIELD based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
31st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SHIELD
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
12th
Average Rating
3.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 0.6%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SHIELD is 1.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SHIELD1.5%
Broadcom Payment Security0.6%
Other97.9%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

JP
We are using the product for 3D Secure authentication and fraud prevention
For CA Risk Analytics, we would like to have some statistics available, to do some counting on the number of transactions for example. Also, to have the ability not only for 3D Secure, but accross all online channels. Online banking and App. Because then you would have three online channels. You would have the same device data, so you can combine it. So then you would have an online banking platform, an app, and 3D Secure all from one supplier. This supplier would support all of our authentication methods across those three channels. That's our ultimate goal to have one supplier to support all three online channels.
Read full review
reviewer2561490 - PeerSpot reviewer
Effective fraud prevention but expensive
We are using SHIELD as the end user for our gaming platform to prevent fraud with our gamers Earlier, there were multiple instances of security issues, like fraud where users were playing with each other and using multiple accounts to redeem cashbacks. Fraud prevention has helped us reduce these…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze."
"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."
"In terms of the fraud that we see on the card site, card not present fraud, the person gives contribution to what the total fraud has increased substantially."
"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and"
"We find the device fingerprinting feature valuable."
 

Cons

"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."
"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works."
"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."
"The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0."
"It is a costly solution since they charge based on MAU."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Healthcare Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SHIELD?
The solution is too expensive. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it nine or ten in terms of cost.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SHIELD?
It is a costly solution since they charge based on MAU. We want to optimize the cost for our platform, and the high cost is the only problem we have with SHIELD.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for SHIELD?
We are using SHIELD as the end user for our gaming platform to prevent fraud with our gamers.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS) vs Broadcom Payment Security Logo
Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS) vs Broadcom Payment Security
Compared 100% of the time
More Broadcom Payment Security Competitors
Fingerprint Enterprise vs SHIELD Logo
Fingerprint Enterprise vs SHIELD
Compared 45% of the time
ThreatMetrix vs SHIELD Logo
ThreatMetrix vs SHIELD
Compared 29% of the time
SEON Fraud Prevention vs SHIELD Logo
SEON Fraud Prevention vs SHIELD
Compared 26% of the time
More SHIELD Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Payment Security
September 2025
Broadcom Payment Security reportDownload Broadcom Payment Security product report
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
August 2025
SHIELD reportDownload SHIELD product report
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
No data available
 

Overview

Find the balance. Payment Security delivers more secure online transactions with an excellent customer experience.

Card-not-present (CNP) fraud costs billions of dollars annually across the globe. Issuers, processors and merchants need new applications to fight back with security that doesn’t get in the way of business.

Broadcom has the answer. With our industry-leading authentication solutions, you benefit from:

  • The largest global consortium network of real-time transaction data
  • Patented predictive neural network models for highly accurate, real-time decision-making
  • Unsurpassed leadership in EMV 3-D Secure

You maintain full control over your authentication strategy, fraud systems and policies. Simply said, our solutions help you lower your costs and accelerate your business success.

Broadcom
SHIELD is a device-first, risk AI platform that helps digital businesses worldwide eliminate fake accounts and stop all fraudulent activity.

SHIELD identifies the root of fraud with the global standard for device identification (SHIELD Device ID) and actionable risk intelligence, empowering businesses to stay ahead of new and unknown fraud threats.

We are trusted by global unicorns like inDrive, Alibaba, Swiggy, Meesho, TrueMoney, and more. With offices in San Francisco, Miami, London, Berlin, Jakarta, Bengaluru, Beijing, and Singapore, we are rapidly achieving our mission - eliminating unfairness to enable trust for the world.

For more information, visit shield.com
SHIELD
 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
August 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.