Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Brinqa vs Tenable Attack Surface Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Brinqa
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
23rd
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (42nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (29th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (13th)
Tenable Attack Surface Mana...
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
10th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of Brinqa is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Attack Surface Management is 4.6%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Attack Surface Management (ASM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Tenable Attack Surface Management4.6%
Brinqa0.1%
Other95.3%
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
 

Featured Reviews

RB
Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs
I would give the easiness of the initial setup a seven out of ten. It can be a bit complex. Some connections are straightforward, but some take a long time. Deploying Brinqa took time, as it was done in phases. Initially, it took about six months before we started getting valuable data from it. Then, it expanded from there. The deployment began with a product demo and contract negotiation. We connected some data sources to Brinqa's cloud service, which was straightforward. We used the default risk ranking algorithm but faced issues with the dashboards, so we customized them to fit our organization's needs over a few years. We depended a lot on Brinqa for the deployment. We had some internal resources, but they lacked the needed skills, so it took time to train our two-man team. Initially, it required one person for maintenance, and they spent most of their time on it.
Use Tenable Attack Surface Management?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.
868,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Retailer
16%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Brinqa?
The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Brinqa?
I would rate the costliness of the solution at a seven out of ten. It is on the expensive side and there are some additional fees.
What needs improvement with Brinqa?
Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision. We felt they were somewhat slow in assisting us in maturing our processes. Additionally, we encountered some stab...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tenable.asm
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Trend Micro, Qualys and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Updated: September 2025.
868,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.