Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GP MaTe vs QAD Enterprise Asset Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GP MaTe
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
31st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
QAD Enterprise Asset Manage...
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
13th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of GP MaTe is 0.2%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QAD Enterprise Asset Management is 1.8%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). Updated: May 2025.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

GP MaTe
QAD MLS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Schindler Elevator, Hyster, Mueller Metals Co., Ashland, Shintech, Pennsylvania State University, Mekong Energy, Pratt & Whitney Power Systems, Wood Group
SOLAFT
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). Updated: May 2025.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.