Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GP MaTe vs Phaidra comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GP MaTe
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
26th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Phaidra
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
36th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of GP MaTe is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Phaidra is 0.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GP MaTe0.8%
Phaidra0.3%
Other98.9%
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). Updated: August 2025.
866,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

GP MaTe
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Schindler Elevator, Hyster, Mueller Metals Co., Ashland, Shintech, Pennsylvania State University, Mekong Energy, Pratt & Whitney Power Systems, Wood Group
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). Updated: August 2025.
866,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.