Devo vs Panther comparison

Devo and Panther are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0, while Panther is ranked #35 with an average rating of 8.0. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Panther’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Panther users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 25 Devo reviews

6,397 Views
3,582 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Panther

Read 3 Panther reviews

2,797 Views
1,846 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

Panther

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Devo and Panther based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Panther Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Panther

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (27th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (19th)

Panther

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

35th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Data Analysis (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panther is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.2%
Panther	0.9%
Other	97.9%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Francisco JavierRomo

Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation

The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.

Read full review

Narendran Nair

Product Security Engineer at Infoblox

AI triage has streamlined real-time alert monitoring and has improved on-call incident response

The best features Panther offers are AI Triage, the ability to comment on our activities, and seamless integration with other communication sources such as PagerDuty, Microsoft Teams, and potentially Slack, showcasing the flexibility we have in using this tool. The most valuable feature for my team is definitely AI Triage, which helps save a lot of time by eliminating the need for manual research regarding patterns that may be repeated, making our work easier and more efficient. Panther has positively impacted my organization as it serves as one of the main sources for triaging real-time incidents. Panther definitely plays a key role in the work that we do. Specific outcomes that show how Panther has helped our organization include saving a lot of time, especially since the AI Triage feature reduces the necessity to reach out to others for clarity, which it occasionally accomplishes on its own. To be honest, it does lack some aspects. For example, if it could access our organizational knowledge, including the Jira database, it might better analyze incidents and determine whether they are false positives or not by using more contextual data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I'm so happy with the platform."

"The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that."

"It is a joy to partner and be able to work with this kind of system."

"Overall, I have no issues with it and my guys love it."

"It's a core tool for us in looking at logs, because logs are the starting point in any investigation, so leveraging Devo from start to finish in any investigation is basically what we do."

"Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive."

"One of the immediate improvements that come to mind is the amount of hot, searchable data, as in the SIEM we had before we were only able to search back 90 days of hot, searchable data, whereas here we have 400 days worth, which has definitely improved our threat hunting capabilities."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

More Devo pros

"We have seen a return on investment measured primarily through SOC efficiency and productivity improvements, with teams observing a twenty to thirty-five percent improvement in investigation efficiency depending on the environment and product maturity."

"I find Panther's detection capabilities and integrations to be highly valuable."

"The AI Triage feature saves a considerable amount of time, and if it were to incorporate organizational knowledge, it could provide finer-tuned results."

Cons

"The cost is a little higher compared to other tools such as DataDog or Elasticsearch, so they could work on reducing costs."

"There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support. But I can say that about pretty much any solution in this space."

"There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. I would go as far as to say the product is deficient in its ability to parse multiple, different log types, including logs from major vendors that are supported by competitors. Additionally, the time that it takes to turn around a supported parser for customers and common log source types, which are generally accepted standards in the industry, is not acceptable. This has impacted customer onboarding and customer relationships for us on multiple fronts."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet."

"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring."

"One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo."

"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."

More Devo cons

"The solution could be improved by providing more built-in integrations, which would reduce the need for me to build them myself."

"Regarding Panther's accuracy and reliability of output, I would rate it at 70 percent since, at times, it identifies findings as valid when they may actually be false positives, which we have experienced in a few cases."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Construction Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Pricing generally depends on the scale, data ingestion requirements, and integrations for what the enterprise monitoring needs. I have not been part of the procurement process, so I am not aware of...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo.UI ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

Devo serves as our centralized log monitoring, threat investigation, alert monitoring, and security analytics platform. We use it to collect logs from multiple systems so we can correlate the event...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Panther?

I am not aware of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing details, as I handle the usage of Panther and not the setup process.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Panther?

Panther could be improved by adding a feature that allows it to access organizational data, which would help produce better-tuned outputs with fewer false positives and alerts, making our jobs easi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Panther?

My main use case for Panther is real-time monitoring of alerts, where we triage incidents that occur for our on-call duties. Panther is one of the major sources from which we receive alerts in real...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Sumo Logic Security vs Panther

Compared 25% of the time

Google Security Operations vs Panther

Compared 20% of the time

Splunk Cloud Platform vs Panther

Compared 14% of the time

Anvilogic vs Panther

Compared 14% of the time

Google Chronicle Suite vs Panther

Compared 5% of the time

More Panther Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

June 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

June 2026

Download Panther product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Panther is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed for modern security teams, offering real-time detection and prevention capabilities.

Panther delivers robust performance in threat detection, with features that enable organizations to monitor, analyze, and respond to security incidents in real-time. Its integration capabilities with various data sources enhance the detection of threats, providing security teams with enhanced visibility and control over their environments.

What are the key features of Panther?

Real-time detection: Monitors and analyzes data instantly for immediate threat identification.
Scalability: Handles large volumes of data, accommodating growing organizational demands.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly connects with existing security tools and infrastructure.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances threat detection and response capabilities.
Cost Efficiency: Offers a scalable solution that optimizes resource usage.
Time Savings: Reduces the time taken to detect and respond to threats.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Panther provides tailored security analytics, efficiently handling high volumes of sensitive data. By integrating with industry-specific systems, Panther helps to maintain compliance and protect critical assets.

Panther

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Docker, Loom, Discord, Dropbox, HubSpot, Asana, GoFundMe, Zapier, Benchling, JupiterOne, Jumio, Bitstamp, Intercom, Randori, and Cedar

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Panther

June 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. Panther

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Panther and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Panther report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.