Devo vs Panther comparison

Devo and Panther are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Panther is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.0. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Panther’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Panther users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 26 Devo reviews

6,972 Views
3,835 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Panther

Read 3 Panther reviews

3,251 Views
2,081 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

Panther

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Devo and Panther based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Panther Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Panther

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (18th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (13th)

Panther

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

34th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Data Analysis (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panther is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.2%
Panther	0.9%
Other	97.9%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Narendran Nair

Product Security Engineer at Infoblox

AI triage has streamlined real-time alert monitoring and has improved on-call incident response

The best features Panther offers are AI Triage, the ability to comment on our activities, and seamless integration with other communication sources such as PagerDuty, Microsoft Teams, and potentially Slack, showcasing the flexibility we have in using this tool. The most valuable feature for my team is definitely AI Triage, which helps save a lot of time by eliminating the need for manual research regarding patterns that may be repeated, making our work easier and more efficient. Panther has positively impacted my organization as it serves as one of the main sources for triaging real-time incidents. Panther definitely plays a key role in the work that we do. Specific outcomes that show how Panther has helped our organization include saving a lot of time, especially since the AI Triage feature reduces the necessity to reach out to others for clarity, which it occasionally accomplishes on its own. To be honest, it does lack some aspects. For example, if it could access our organizational knowledge, including the Jira database, it might better analyze incidents and determine whether they are false positives or not by using more contextual data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC."

"Devo saves us hours in every investigation."

"Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo."

"We can ingest virtually any log source, which is much better than our previous solution."

"Devo has improved our visibility, log management efficiency, and investigation capabilities positively."

"Because of the way Devo works, our onboarding time has shrunk by 50 percent at least."

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

"Devo provides good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

More Devo pros

"I find Panther's detection capabilities and integrations to be highly valuable."

"We have seen a return on investment measured primarily through SOC efficiency and productivity improvements, with teams observing a twenty to thirty-five percent improvement in investigation efficiency depending on the environment and product maturity."

"The AI Triage feature saves a considerable amount of time, and if it were to incorporate organizational knowledge, it could provide finer-tuned results."

Cons

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet."

"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."

"They can improve their AI capabilities"

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."

"Some of the documentation could be improved a little bit. A lot of times it doesn't go as deep into some of the critical issues you might run into. They've been really good to shore us up with support, but some of the documentation could be a little bit better."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement."

More Devo cons

"Regarding Panther's accuracy and reliability of output, I would rate it at 70 percent since, at times, it identifies findings as valid when they may actually be false positives, which we have experienced in a few cases."

"The solution could be improved by providing more built-in integrations, which would reduce the need for me to build them myself."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Panther?

I am not aware of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing details, as I handle the usage of Panther and not the setup process.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Panther?

Panther could be improved by adding a feature that allows it to access organizational data, which would help produce better-tuned outputs with fewer false positives and alerts, making our jobs easi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Panther?

My main use case for Panther is real-time monitoring of alerts, where we triage incidents that occur for our on-call duties. Panther is one of the major sources from which we receive alerts in real...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Sumo Logic Security vs Panther

Compared 23% of the time

Google Security Operations vs Panther

Compared 20% of the time

Anvilogic vs Panther

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Cloud Platform vs Panther

Compared 12% of the time

Google Chronicle Suite vs Panther

Compared 4% of the time

More Panther Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

August 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

August 2026

Download Panther product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Panther is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed for modern security teams, offering real-time detection and prevention capabilities.

Panther delivers robust performance in threat detection, with features that enable organizations to monitor, analyze, and respond to security incidents in real-time. Its integration capabilities with various data sources enhance the detection of threats, providing security teams with enhanced visibility and control over their environments.

What are the key features of Panther?

Real-time detection: Monitors and analyzes data instantly for immediate threat identification.
Scalability: Handles large volumes of data, accommodating growing organizational demands.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly connects with existing security tools and infrastructure.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances threat detection and response capabilities.
Cost Efficiency: Offers a scalable solution that optimizes resource usage.
Time Savings: Reduces the time taken to detect and respond to threats.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Panther provides tailored security analytics, efficiently handling high volumes of sensitive data. By integrating with industry-specific systems, Panther helps to maintain compliance and protect critical assets.

Panther

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Docker, Loom, Discord, Dropbox, HubSpot, Asana, GoFundMe, Zapier, Benchling, JupiterOne, Jumio, Bitstamp, Intercom, Randori, and Cedar

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Panther

August 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. Panther

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Panther and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Panther report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.