Invicti vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security comparison

"The best features of Invicti are its ability to confirm access vulnerabilities, SSL injection vulnerabilities, and its connectors to other security tools."

"Crawling feature: Netsparker has very detail crawling steps and mechanisms. This feature expands the attack surface."

"This tool is really fast and the information that they provide on vulnerabilities is pretty good."

"The scanner is light on the network and does not impact the network when scans are running."

"The platform is stable."

"The solution generates reports automatically and quickly."

"I am impressed with Invictus’ proof-based scanning. The solution has reduced the incidence of false positive vulnerabilities. It has helped us reduce our time and focus on vulnerabilities."

"The most attractive feature was the reporting review tool. The reporting review was very impressive and produced very fruitful reports."

"The solution is easy to integrate."

"Trend Micro has DLP features in it, which separates it from other solutions."

"Dependable with ease of integration with other security products."

"The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is its stability across all platforms."

"Trend Micro Cloud App is easy to use and easy to install."

"Our business emails are very important and Trend Micro Cloud App Security has provided a high level of protection. Additionally, there are updating the solution frequently."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"It has more intelligence features than other vendors."

"The proxy review, the use report views, the current use tool and the subset requests need some improvement. It was hard to understand how to use them."

"Netsparker doesn't provide the source code of the static application security testing."

"They don't really provide the proof of concept up to the level that we need in our organization. We are a consultancy firm, and we provide consultancy for the implementation and deployment solutions to our customers. When you run the scans and the scan is completed, it only shows the proof of exploit, which really doesn't work because the tool is running the scan and exploiting on the read-only form. You don't really know whether it is actually giving the proof of exploit. We cannot prove it manually to a customer that the exploit is genuine. It is really hard to perform it manually and prove it to the concerned development, remediation, and security teams. It is currently missing the static application security part of the application security, especially web application security. It would be really cool if they can integrate a SAS tool with their dynamic one."

"The solution needs to make a more specific report."

"The higher level vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting, SQL Injection, and other higher level injection attacks are difficult to highlight using Netsparker."

"Invicti takes too long with big applications, and there are issues with the login portal."

"The licensing model should be improved to be more cost-effective. There are URL restrictions that consume our license. Compared to other DAST solutions and task tools like WebInspect and Burp Enterprise, Invicti is very expensive. The solution’s scanning time is also very long compared to other DAST tools. It might be due to proof-based scanning."

"The custom attack preparation screen might be improved."

"In the next release, I would like to see the cost go down."

"The price of the solution could improve by being lower."

"The granulation of the policy setup needs to be better. Right now, it is too basic."

"The solution's technical support services could be better."

"They should provide separate corporate-level licenses for two to three instances."

"It would be great if Trend Mail Cloud App Security would be joined with a web security solution, making it a multiple-network solution."

"There is room for improvement in the DLP component of Trend Micro Cloud App Security."

"Documentation could be improved; product cost is quite high."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"It is competitive in the security market."

"The price of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is expensive for regular users. There are not any hidden fees. First-time users of the solution should purchase implementation packages or professional services."

"The solution's price is mid-ranged."

"The pricing of the solution could be better."

"The product's pricing is reasonable compared to other vendors."

"The cost of the license is on the high side. It's a yearly subscription."