No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Why PeerSpot?

Network Troubleshooting Reviews for 2022

it_user326337 - PeerSpot reviewer
Customer Success Manager at PeerSpot
  • 27
Published:May 29, 2017
Explore related topics
Product comparison that may be of interest to you
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Find out what your peers are saying about Wireshark, Auvik, Isovalent and others in Network Troubleshooting. Updated: October 2026.
920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
EN
Project Manager at AB Networks
Sep 15, 2023
Sep 15, 2023
Hello Peers, I am a Project Manager at a medium-sized tech services company. I am currently researching the best network modeling tool. Which tool is better: NetAlly AirMagnet Survey Pro with Aircheck-G3 or Ekahau Connect? Which tool has better designing and troubleshooting features? Thank you.
See 1 answer
it_user2268669 - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Editor at PeerSpot
Sep 15, 2023
Both NetAlly AirMagnet Survey Pro with Aircheck-G3 and Ekahau Connect are powerful Network Modeling tools with many features. However, there are some critical differences between the two tools. NetAlly AirMagnet Survey Pro with Aircheck-G3: Strengths: Comprehensive Network Modeling and analysis capabilities Strong support for Wi-Fi networks Easy-to-use interface Weaknesses: Some say it can be expensive Some find it complex to use, even for advanced users Ekahau Connect: Strengths: Affordable, as reported by some Easy to use Cloud-based deployment Weaknesses: May not be as comprehensive as AirMagnet Survey Pro Limited support for non-Wi-Fi networks Many find that AirMagnet Survey Pro and Ekahau Connect have robust design and troubleshooting features. However, it is reported that AirMagnet Survey Pro offers more features and functionality for advanced users. For example, AirMagnet Survey Pro has a " Heatmapper " feature that allows users to create detailed heatmaps of their Wi-Fi networks. AirMagnet Survey Pro also includes a feature called "Aircheck-G3" that enables users to troubleshoot Wi-Fi networks in real time. AirMagnet Survey Pro may be better for you if you are looking for a comprehensive Network Modeling tool with solid support for Wi-Fi networks. However, Ekahau Connect may be better if you want a more affordable and easy-to-use tool.
Julia Miller - PeerSpot reviewer
Community Director at PeerSpot
Jul 25, 2026
Jul 25, 2026
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is average. The cost is typically higher for these kinds of tools, so it is moderate.
2 out of 72 answers
DS
Head of Global Network at SIS Securitas
Apr 27, 2021
Compared to other products, Auvik's pricing is more feasible since you get all its features. You pay for licenses on a per network device basis. It monitors hypervisors, but does not bill for that. There are no additional costs, which is something that I like.
GB
Sr. Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
May 3, 2021
The pricing is fair for the value and time saved that you get out of it. The larger you go, the more sense it makes per device, because as you hit different pricing tiers, it becomes much more affordable per device. Auvik is billed by network device. They've got a very clear-cut definition of what is a device and what isn't a device, and that's very convenient. Anything like a server, or a phone, or an access point, is not billed but they are still captured for data, which is very useful. Auvik is very upfront that the solution is not a good server monitoring platform, but it's a fair server monitoring platform and that comes along for free with everything else. My server guys have another system they use for monitoring servers, but they find being able to look at Auvik as well has been a huge value-add.
Product Comparisons
Related Categories
Download Free Report
Download our free Network Troubleshooting Report and find out what your peers are saying about NetAlly, NETSCOUT, Wireshark, and more! Updated: October 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.