For me, pricing for Tricentis qTest is moderate, so that's a five out of ten. It's more affordable than my company's previous solution, which was Micro Focus ALM.
It is pretty costly, from what I remember. It's quite a few times more costly than other tools on the market. We compared it to the other leading test management tools. We went for it because of the features and the value it could add to our organization.
Assistant Vice President, IT Quality Assurance at Guardian Life Insurance
Real User
2019-10-30T06:14:00Z
Oct 30, 2019
I have not looked at it recently, but our license price point is somewhere between $1,000 and $2,000 a year. It's pretty low when you think about what we used to have. We haven't had any additional costs from Tricentis. We do the hosting on Amazon, so that's our cost.
For the 35 concurrent licenses, we pay something like $35,000 a year. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing fees, until we get into Tosca. We have the Elite version, which allows us to have Insight, Parameters, Explorer Sessions, Pulse, Launch, and Flood.
Sr. Manager Quality Assurance at Forcepoint LLC (Formerly Raytheon|Websense)
Real User
2019-10-24T04:52:00Z
Oct 24, 2019
There is an upfront, yearly cost for concurrent licenses, meaning we're not limited to a specific number of users, only to a specific number of users online at a certain time. That works really well for us because we're a global organization. We'll have people online in San Diego, and those licenses then can be used later in the day by people online in Tel Aviv. It's been a really great licensing model for us. I believe that there is a maintenance cost as well. I'm not really involved in the payment of that, so I don't really know what it would be.
Senior Director of Quality Engineering at Cheetah Digital
Real User
2019-10-24T04:52:00Z
Oct 24, 2019
We're paying a little over $1,000 for a concurrent license. One of the solutions we looked at was about half of that but that one is very much a bare-bones test management tool. There are no additional costs. We pay a flat yearly rate for each license.
Tricentis is the global leader in enterprise continuous testing, widely credited for reinventing software testing for DevOps, cloud, and enterprise applications. The Tricentis AI-based, continuous testing platform provides a new and fundamentally different way to perform software testing. An approach that’s totally automated, fully codeless, and intelligently driven by AI. It addresses both agile development and complex enterprise apps, enabling enterprises to accelerate their digital...
Based on whatever I heard, I can say that Tricentis qTest is a little costlier than other test management tools, like Jira, Zephyr, or Xray.
For me, pricing for Tricentis qTest is moderate, so that's a five out of ten. It's more affordable than my company's previous solution, which was Micro Focus ALM.
We signed for a year and I believe we paid $24,000 for Flood, Manager, and qTest Insights. We paid an extra for $4,000 for the migration support.
We're paying $19,000 a year right now for qTest, with 19 licenses. All the on-premise support is bundled into that.
It is pretty costly, from what I remember. It's quite a few times more costly than other tools on the market. We compared it to the other leading test management tools. We went for it because of the features and the value it could add to our organization.
I believe we have an annual subscription.
I have not looked at it recently, but our license price point is somewhere between $1,000 and $2,000 a year. It's pretty low when you think about what we used to have. We haven't had any additional costs from Tricentis. We do the hosting on Amazon, so that's our cost.
The price I was quoted is just under $60,000 for 30 licenses, annually, and that's with a 26.5 percent discount.
For the 35 concurrent licenses, we pay something like $35,000 a year. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing fees, until we get into Tosca. We have the Elite version, which allows us to have Insight, Parameters, Explorer Sessions, Pulse, Launch, and Flood.
There is an upfront, yearly cost for concurrent licenses, meaning we're not limited to a specific number of users, only to a specific number of users online at a certain time. That works really well for us because we're a global organization. We'll have people online in San Diego, and those licenses then can be used later in the day by people online in Tel Aviv. It's been a really great licensing model for us. I believe that there is a maintenance cost as well. I'm not really involved in the payment of that, so I don't really know what it would be.
We're paying a little over $1,000 for a concurrent license. One of the solutions we looked at was about half of that but that one is very much a bare-bones test management tool. There are no additional costs. We pay a flat yearly rate for each license.