I haven't tried browser testing with the tool, but I have tried using it on two to four different desktop applications. The improvements in testing capabilities from the use of the solution are reflected in the area of object detection methods. For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily. The tool provides data-driven testing, which helps continuously use test cases. I don't think the real device testing in OpenText UFT Digital Lab impacted testing accuracy. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
I highly recommend OpenText's end-to-end solution for application lifecycle management. I can say it ranks among the top three options in this regard. My recommendation is not solely based on its affordability, but rather its effectiveness. When the right processes, people, methods, and frameworks are employed, OpenText's solution can yield substantial benefits and a rapid return on investment. It is crucial to implement and utilize the product correctly without altering it into something it wasn't designed to be. I would rate it nine out of ten.
Developer Automation Tests at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2019-08-05T06:23:00Z
Aug 5, 2019
In rating the product on a scale of one to ten where ten is best, I would rate this product a seven. I think that Mobile Center can offer a good platform and practice to do your work. It is easy to implement and easy to configure once you get used to the product. The problems are the lack of better documentation and more friendly user interface.
Our enterprise-level solution is a complete, centralized lab of real mobile devices and emulators. With remote access, developers and testers can develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize mobile apps from anywhere.
I haven't tried browser testing with the tool, but I have tried using it on two to four different desktop applications. The improvements in testing capabilities from the use of the solution are reflected in the area of object detection methods. For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily. The tool provides data-driven testing, which helps continuously use test cases. I don't think the real device testing in OpenText UFT Digital Lab impacted testing accuracy. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
I highly recommend OpenText's end-to-end solution for application lifecycle management. I can say it ranks among the top three options in this regard. My recommendation is not solely based on its affordability, but rather its effectiveness. When the right processes, people, methods, and frameworks are employed, OpenText's solution can yield substantial benefits and a rapid return on investment. It is crucial to implement and utilize the product correctly without altering it into something it wasn't designed to be. I would rate it nine out of ten.
I rate the product an eight out of ten.
We are at an early stage in terms of using this solution. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
In rating the product on a scale of one to ten where ten is best, I would rate this product a seven. I think that Mobile Center can offer a good platform and practice to do your work. It is easy to implement and easy to configure once you get used to the product. The problems are the lack of better documentation and more friendly user interface.
Try to put it first of all in your own lab and then try to put it in the customer's.