Human Defense Platform vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Human Defense Platform
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
27th
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Bot Management (5th)
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authe...
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Human Defense Platform is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is 4.8%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention
Unique Categories:
Bot Management
8.3%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

it_user785406 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 7, 2017
They ensure that our campaigns have run in the highest quality of settings, leading to savings on ad spending
Primary use case of this solution is to detect fraud traffic (also mark the network which is sending the fraud traffic) and block the fraud traffic. These metrics help us to minimize wasted ad spend and provide our clients an extra layer of confidence around our campaigns As a result of the…
RD
Dec 29, 2022
Offers robotics, machine learning, and enables us to reduce analysts
In terms of what could be improved, one of the problems that our clients generally talk about is the price of the product when they have to purchase the product and the licenses for it. Those are on the higher side, in which case they would go ahead developing the built-in solution. Otherwise, the product is good compared to Actimize's competitors' products. They have provided a feature wherein you can develop your own goals and targets along with it. There are some applications that will restrict you from doing something. But this application always provides you a plugin. You develop a plugin, you configure something and you can add any data. You can introduce any source. You can write to any file. You can then read reports, whether it is a PDF or something, or you can directly interact with a third party, such as a government organization wherein there is a feature like RFI, a request for information. For example, let's consider there is a federal investigation going on and they need to have a response from a federal team. They will send out the RFI request. Once the federal team responds back on that, the response will automatically trigger an action once it is received. There are a lot of automated things and they haven't restricted anything. Even if there is a little drawback or a shortcoming, you can always create a Java code to use and just patch something in there. So in that sense, I would say that it is an open-ended product, it's not a closed environment. I haven't had the chance to work on robotics, so I can not comment on that part. But it looks like that is something that they have developed recently. The other issue is that if you want to learn about the application itself, the training is not available as an open-source. It is restricted and you have to pay for it and get a formal certification, and only then you would be able to implement something with that. Even if you try to Google it, you won't be able to find the actual code or how to configure it and all that information.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is an expensive product."
"I don't know how licensing is handled in the current organization. I know that Actimize provides an option for yearly licensing because that's what we had in my previous job."
"We need a separate license for each of the packages, such as the core package, self-development package, and customization package."
"I don't like the length of our vendor contracts because it kills our flexibility."
"It is reasonable for enterprise customers."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Retailer
9%
Media Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
42%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Can PerimeterX Bot Defender be deployed in a cloud environment, such as AWS or Azure?
The solution seamlessly integrates with Azure infrastructure, making it easy for users to protect their web applications from malicious bot traffic. The integration process is straightforward. By d...
Can PerimeterX Bot Defender handle bot attacks that utilize rotating IP addresses or proxies?
The solution employs device fingerprinting and behavioral analysis to accurately identify and block malicious bots, despite their IP address. With PerimeterX in place, users can successfully mitiga...
What are some of the ways that account fraud is committed and how can PerimeterX Bot Defender help us defend against that?
One of the significant concerns with account fraud is the creation of fake accounts using stolen personally identifiable information. With PerimeterX Bot Defender, users are able to identify and bl...
 

Also Known As

PerimeterX Bot Defender, BotGuard for Applications, HUMAN MediaGuard
Actimize, NICE Actimize, Nice Actimize Fraud and Authentication Management)
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

theTradeDesk
Associated Banc-Corp
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: June 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.