Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs Zivver comparison

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Pr...
Read 2 Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP reviews
  • 37 Views
  • 24 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Zivver
  • 24 Views
  • 17 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP and Zivver based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: July 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
July 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 793,295 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Pr...
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
29th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zivver
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
64th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

CP
Feb 19, 2024
Provides data loss prevention strategies, flexibility for policy adjustments but needs improvement in automation and accuracy
Our main use cases are monitoring, classification, and auto-discovery.  Auto-discovery is required for existing protection, and data classification is a newly added feature still under development by a third party. We also use it for email, file, and folder data classification.  Risk monitoring is…
Read full review
Use Zivver?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost is roughly 90 US dollars per year, per license."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?
It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?
The licensing cost is roughly 90 US dollars per year, per license.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?
Ideally, it should have some native analytical tools with good graphical options, but the current options lack customization. Improved analytical tools would provide a more granular technical view ...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
July 2024
Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP reportDownload Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP product report
Buyer's Guide
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
July 2024
Zivver reportDownload Zivver product report
 

Learn More

Forcepoint
Zivver
 

Overview

Simplifying data security through personalized automation

Zivver automates email security, allowing your organisation to avoid the leading causes of data leaks and ensuring compliance, effortlessly.

Buyer's Guide
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
July 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: July 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.