New Relic vs OpenText Real User Monitoring comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

New Relic
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
152
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (6th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (5th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd), AIOps (3rd)
OpenText Real User Monitoring
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
45th
Average Rating
6.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of New Relic is 7.1%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Real User Monitoring is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Unique Categories:
Network Monitoring Software
2.3%
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
4.5%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

PT
Jul 28, 2022
Provides a complete picture of what's happening and has an accurate alert mechanism
The alert mechanism is quite accurate when something goes wrong in your system. For example, if you have hundreds of APIs on your server, and any of the APIs is not performing well, you get an alert. When there is a drop or change in the threshold value, the beauty of New Relic is that within a fraction of seconds, all the stakeholders who are configured in the New Relic system will get an alert. That's one good thing. There is a dashboard where you can view API-wise performance. When you click specific APIs, you can get detailed statistics for the same.
MS
Nov 4, 2019
Works well as part of an end-to-end solution, but product roadmap has halted
If we're talking about an end-to-end solution, it has to come from one vendor, which provides the underlying infrastructure as well. In that case, Micro Focus or BMC would score better than one-point solutions, like AppDynamics, New Relic, or Dynatrace, because they are pure APM solutions. When it comes to end-to-end apps management, integrated solutions score better. Otherwise, you would need a lot of integration done along with the underlying infrastructure to get the end-to-end view. Besides the transaction side, you will also need to set up the underlying infrastructure, database, and the whole holistic view, if you would like to have that.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We detect issues using dashboards that we built on New Relic."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Sometimes, I monitor the user's time of response and use this information to improve the number of servers on the back-end. Or, I can use it to change my back log for front-end developers and improve their response times. It's very important in this case because I can improve the experience of the final user."
"It has in-depth analysis using developer code for someone whose not traditionally a developer."
"It has prevented failures from occurring in our production environment."
"There are many valuable features in New Relic APM. We developed some software applications and we are able to monitor the errors very easily. Their log security retention is very good."
"It is easier to create new dashboards in the New Relic interface, and it is also easier to query if when I want to monitor a different parameter or time duration on my dashboard."
"The most valuable feature is application monitoring."
"The most useful feature of this solution is tracking. When the application's traffic has been monitored it is taken from that particular application and analyzed. It is then given a live session of that particular user. For example, if you are using your bank application to do some kind of transaction, everything that you do can be tracked by that application."
"The technical support is good at resolving issues."
"Very easy to implement."
"The Real User Monitor, with its transaction and synthetic transaction monitoring, is the typical classic in APM cases when the customer would like to do transaction monitoring. Micro Focus scores better where the underlying infrastructure management is also covered by Micro Focus tools."
"Real User Monitor has improved our productivity."
"The most valuable feature is application performance monitoring."
"The reporting feature is good for us."
 

Cons

"I haven't come across any features that are lacking."
"It would help customers if there were an on-premises version available."
"Compared to their competitors, they are missing some features at the moment."
"The UX/UI design of New Relic APM could be improved. The solution currently has some slow pages in terms of loading and viewing the pages, for example, the reports. The reports and other pages take a long time to load."
"The solution could improve by having more network monitoring features, such as for all the infrastructure."
"The solution should include more detailed reports for SQL database requests."
"Documentation is one of the biggest things that I have a problem with since its documentation is not clear sometimes."
"I would like if it could have predictive analysis. Today, we only have the option to configure thresholds."
"When we want to monitor our encrypted traffic, this product doesn't work because our cipher is not supported."
"Real User Monitor needs to cover more protocols to provide more in-depth information. It could also be better at monitoring voice-related traffic. There is currently no visibility in that channel."
"One area to improve is the user interface, of course. The second one is their R&D has virtually stopped building a product roadmap."
"We would like to see support for non-Windows environments."
"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."
"This technology is considered to be older."
"Some issues with login errors."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We deploy everything on AWS. Purchasing the product on AWS Marketplace made it easier for us."
"The pricing could be better. We did not purchase the full version. Maybe if we applied all the other features of the full version of New Relic, we could get all the features that we feel are missing."
"The price of the solution could be less expensive. You have to pay a lot for each user. There is an additional cost for extra features."
"I think it's overpriced for the technical support that we get. We spent over 1,00,000 USD a year."
"The price was one of the reasons we chose this solution."
"It would be nice if we could buy it annually instead of monthly."
"I think the pricing is reasonable."
"The pricing model is a little confusing for beginners. They find it a little expensive, and if you are using it already, then that is not good."
"The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."
"Not expensive."
"If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
30%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
31%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
What do you like most about New Relic?
It allows the restriction of privileges and control of users.
What needs improvement with New Relic?
The solution only supports the cloud platform and not on-premises. Therefore, they should assess supporting the licensing on-premises as well.
What do you like most about Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
Real User Monitor has improved our productivity.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
Real User Monitor needs to cover more protocols to provide more in-depth information. It could also be better at monitoring voice-related traffic. There is currently no visibility in that channel.
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
We use Real User Monitor to monitor services and capture problems from a user perspective, such as availability issues. The reports and metrics we collect from Real User Monitor help us to improve ...
 

Also Known As

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM
Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM, MF RUM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club
Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB
Find out what your peers are saying about New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.