Ivanti Neurons for RBVM vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Neurons for RBVM
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
45th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tenable Vulnerability Manag...
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 11.5%, up from 10.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
21.4%
 

Featured Reviews

JV
Apr 27, 2022
Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations
We use RiskSense for vulnerability management, and we have many integrations.  The solution is deployed on cloud. We use this solution daily. There are more than 200 people using this solution in my organization Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user…
Faisal Mian - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 26, 2024
An easy-to-manage solution to gain visibility into all IPs
The product operates on a license-based model, where you purchase a license based on the number of IP addresses you intend to scan. For example, if you purchase a license for 50 IP addresses and your network has 200 users, it will only scan for those 50 IPs. You can gain visibility into all IPs…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."
"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."
"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."
"The interface is fine."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"The solution is quite friendly."
"The initial setup is straightforward so long as your infrastructure, components, and networks are in place."
"The initial setup is not complex."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
 

Cons

"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management could be improved with an increased number of dashboards and MSSP integration."
"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."
"Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand."
"I'd like to see them improve their support."
"Users get confused between VPR and CVSS ratings."
"I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints, which is approximately one dollar per endpoint."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."
"The solution is not too expensive."
"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."
"There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."
"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."
"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It is in the middle."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
Educational Organization
25%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...
 

Also Known As

RiskSense
Tenable.io
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Care First, City of Alburquerque, Electric Company El Paso, State of Arizona, Washington Gas
Global Payments AU/NZ
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: June 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.