We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution helps identify threats and vulnerabilities."
"One valuable feature is the Microsoft Security Scorecard."
"The product’s most valuable features are compliance, recommendations, and inventories."
"The solution is up-to-date and helps prevent zero-day attacks."
"The product's stability is very high...The scalability of the product is amazing."
"There is no burden of updating or upgrading this solution."
"The dashboard is pretty intuitive, and it lets you do a drill-down analysis of each vulnerability. That is something that brings a lot of value to the organization."
"The initial setup is straightforward so long as your infrastructure, components, and networks are in place."
"The initial setup is not complex."
"The solution provides seamlessness, a perfect UI, and identity management for office operations. We are most vulnerable to users. Therefore, it is crucial to implement the right solution to ensure proper user access and resource management."
"It is pretty stable. I would rate it nine or maybe ten."
"It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers."
"The solution is very simple to use."
"It is challenging to extract and customize reports from the system."
"The technical support takes too much time to resolve tickets."
"The setup phase of the product is not that easy and needs a person to have a certain level of expertise."
"Integration can be improved."
"The general support could be improved."
"An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard. For example, the dashboard does not allow us to view a previous months vulnerability results alongside current results to make comparisons."
"Another area of improvement is customer service and support. Tenable needs to include support in the pricing/license. Currently, they push clients to get support from partners or channel distributors, who often charge a lot."
"The UI has room for improvement."
"The product is a bit expensive."
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
"It's not a user-friendly tool since it has a complicated interface."
"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."
"There needs to be better dashboard navigation."
More Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is ranked 23rd in Vulnerability Management with 5 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management writes "The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Sentinel and Microsoft Defender XDR, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Rapid7 InsightVM. See our Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
