Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection vs Netskope comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Infoblox Advanced DNS Prote...
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Domain Name System (DNS) Security (2nd)
Netskope
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (4th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Domain Name System (DNS) Security category, the mindshare of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is 21.7%, down from 22.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netskope is 3.9%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Domain Name System (DNS) Security
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)
21.2%
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)
15.1%
 

Featured Reviews

SA
Jul 10, 2023
With a good interface and ease of management, the solution also provides a reasonable amount of stability and scalability
Our organization uses the tool as security for Domain Name System or DNS The solution helps to identify and mitigate DNS attacks. The interface and ease of management are the most valuable features of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection. Infoblox lacks an extensive product portfolio. If we go for…
HemantKumar4 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 18, 2023
Effective for managing shadow IT and provides continuous data protection for users connected to the internet
Our one use case involved shadow IT. We had numerous cloud applications being used by the business without the IT team's awareness. A lot of data was being exchanged with these cloud applications.  Another use case centered around our corporate applications, specifically Google Workspace. We…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Infoblox Secure DNS helped us protect our internal environment by mitigating and stopping attacks through the Internet using DNS protocols and queries."
"The most valuable feature of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is its performance and visibility."
"Grid high availability technology ensured network reliability, resilient network services, failover, recovery, and seamless maintenance."
"The main advantages with Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection are the dashboards, the reporting system, and they have the GUI interface."
"Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection allows us to manage our overall addresses and IT in one location. Many companies are using this solution, it is very popular."
"Centralized management of DNS, DHCP, and IPAM helped us a lot in simplifying and automating the management of network and services."
"It is a stable solution."
"DHCP is a basic service, and they've been doing it for years, so it's mature and stable."
"The most valuable features were related to discovery, data protection, and ensuring compliance with regulations."
"The solution provides information about third-party applications registered to our corporate email address and alerts us when users enroll in other applications using their work email."
"They are very good at CASB as compared to other players."
"Netskope is a really good product. I cannot segregate which features are the most valuable. We find most of the features to be valuable. It gives us what we are looking for."
"The initial setup of Netskope CASB is easy, it is not complex."
"The detection capability is very nice and lightweight."
"Netskope's control is user-friendly and comprehensible. It also helps in conveying information effectively as a company, making it crucial for customer satisfaction."
"It's a comprehensive security portfolio solution."
 

Cons

"There is a steep learning curve to be able to use Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection well."
"The service monitoring information could be simplified of this appliance and the information displayed on the dashboards could be improved. I have not found one dashboard to be perfect. For example, in Splunk, I can create a dashboard in Grafana. However, in Grafana, it takes a very long time to create them. There should be another API to do it better."
"Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection could be more user-friendly because you need knowledge if you want to use it. To handle the solution, you need to be a subject matter expert, so this is one area for improvement."
"Infoblox lacks an extensive product portfolio."
"I think only the technical documentation and administration of box could be a little bit improved."
"The price could be reduced to improve the solution."
"There needs to be more capabilities in order to configure the console itself instead of the user interface dashboard. Configuring the DNS or DHCP through the console instead of the GUI dashboard would be better."
"They should release frequent updates for its on-premises version."
"Compatibility with other proxy polars would be helpful."
"The CSPM model needs to improve."
"Technical support and the user interface could be improved."
"The configuration in the cloud model could be improved upon."
"The solution is still pretty new to the CASB environment."
"They could add endpoint security features."
"There could be better integration with other solutions."
"They could improve their mobile agents as they have some limitations."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is a little more expensive than other vendors."
"The solution is expensive."
"I am not sure about the price of the solution, but I heard it is expensive."
"The price of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection could be reduced, it is expensive."
"There are no additional costs to the standard licensing price of the solution."
"Netskope's pricing is reasonable compared to Microsoft."
"The tool's pricing is not too cheap or expensive. However, it can be costly for a small business."
"It is an expensive solution."
"They should work on licensing costs."
"I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is low price."
"Pricing is a little expensive but it is affordable."
"Licensing fees are paid annually."
"I would rate the pricing nine out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Domain Name System (DNS) Security solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection?
The solution's user interface is very smooth compared to other products.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection?
Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is a little more expensive than other vendors.
What needs improvement with Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection?
The solution's logging could be improved. I have worked with other pure Linux-based products that help capture the traffic. Compared to those products, Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection lags occasio...
Which is better, Zscaler internet access or Netsckope CASB?
We researched Netskope but ultimately chose Zscaler. Netskope is a cloud access security broker that helps identify and manage cloud applications, protecting your sensitive data from exfiltration....
What do you like most about Netskope CASB?
The product's analytics part is pretty fine.
 

Also Known As

Infoblox Secure DNS
Netskope CASB
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Colruyt Group, Council Rock School District, Danone, GlaxoSmithKline, The Hershey Company 
NetApp, Genomic Health, Caterpillar, Apollo, Pandora, Continental Resources, Fractal, infinera, Tesla
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Infoblox, Palo Alto Networks and others in Domain Name System (DNS) Security. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.