Bitbar vs Selenium HQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbar
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
27th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Platforms (17th)
Selenium HQ
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
103
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Bitbar is 0.5%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Selenium HQ is 4.1%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
Unique Categories:
Regression Testing Tools
4.9%
 

Featured Reviews

MW
Aug 25, 2017
It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not.
It's good that Testdroid are providing more devices to end users so that one who doesn't have a device can use it on the cloud. It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not Device fragmentation was good enough for…
Gunaseelan Ramalingam - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 25, 2023
Good functionality and helps us maintain a certain quality of work
We use the solution to perform tests and robotic process automation The solution helps us improve and maintain a specific set of work quality. Also, it saves a lot of time for us. The solution's core functionality is excellent. They should add more functionality to the solution. Also, they…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Ability to use different frameworks."
"Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"In general, I would say that the API set is the most valuable feature."
"Its biggest advantage is that it is very customizable."
"Due to its popularity, you can find pretty much any answer in open discussions from the community."
"The most valuable feature of Selenium HQ is the ability to create automatic tests that can replicate human behavior."
"The solution is free to use."
"We can run multiple projects at the same time and we can design both types of framework, including data-driven or hybrid. We have got a lot of flexibility here."
"The most valuable features of Selenium HQ are the automation of all UI tests, its open-source, reliability, and is supported by Google."
"The stability of the solution has been good, it is reliable we have not had any bugs."
 

Cons

"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"The login could be improved, to obviate the need for relying on another one for integration with Selenium HQ"
"Selenium HQ can be complex. The interface requires a QA engineer or an expert to use it."
"Coding skills are required to use Selenium, so it could be made more user-friendly for non-programmers."
"Handling frames and windows needs to be improved."
"It does require a programming skill set. I would like the product not to require a heavy programming skill set and be more user-friendly for someone without a programming background."
"We do not have enough resources or enough people to employ and hire. So, I'm hiring whoever I find, and they don't always have enough technical knowledge to operate Selenium."
"I would like to see Selenium HQ support legacy platforms."
"The drawback is the solution is not easy to learn."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is complicated. It's in the middle."
"I have been using the open-source version."
"Selenium HQ is a free solution."
"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."
"Selenium HQ is open source and our use of it in our company is provided for free."
"We are satisfied with the pricing."
"Selenium HQ is a free solution."
"Selenium is free software so we do not pay licensing costs."
"It is all free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Testdroid
SeleniumHQ
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rovio, Paf, Supercell, NITRO Games, Seriously, AVG, Google, Bosch, Yahoo, Microsoft, Yandex, Mozilla, eBay, PayPal, TESCO, Cisco WebEx, Facebook, LinkedIn, skype, Subway
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbar vs. Selenium HQ and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.