We performed a comparison between Bitbar and Sauce Labs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"Ability to use different frameworks."
"The custom capabilities that can be provided to Sauce Labs VMs during automated testing sessions are a valuable option for experimental or niche testing."
"Sauce Connect gave us ability to test an application that was hosted locally."
"Testing subscription videos for on-demand software, making them better quality and bug free for our customers."
"With Sauce Labs, we have a whole universe of devices: Galaxy, all the iPhones, and all the operating system versions. All our software developers are able to test on a multitude of different devices."
"The most valuable feature is the cross-browser feature, it has many android and iOS devices both simulators and real devices. It's easy to integrate. I also like video recording too."
"Running tests in parallel."
"I find that the multitude of browser and OS versions are very helpful for broadening testing scope."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to run concurrent automated tests up to a specified value, depending on what we are currently paying for."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"The ability to install profiles on iOS real mobile devices should be included."
"Another aspect that could be improved is having the virtual devices boot up a little quicker. Sometimes we wait up to a minute before a device is available. It would be nice if that was 30 seconds or so."
"The testing process is difficult. I need to prove the complete competency of the tool, and I am finding that challenging."
"Another feature that could still be improved on is more error clarity. Sometimes when running automated scripts the test will fail on the device side instead of the script and errors only show a 500 try again message instead of a detailed script that could of a been a timeout error from the code."
"Sauce Labs needs to be improved in the different platforms for farm testing, like iOS and Android farm testing and farm testing web browsers."
"User account management needs an overhauls, allowing for user groups rather than just a hierarchy structure."
"We have faced challenges with the availability of mobile devices. There was once or twice where there were no mobile devices available."
"We had some specific features that we opened tickets on, although they were not earth-shattering. For example, the way the menus scroll could be improved because it does not have a bar, the way that people are used to, where you can move up and down."
Earn 20 points
Bitbar is ranked 27th in Functional Testing Tools while Sauce Labs is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 113 reviews. Bitbar is rated 7.0, while Sauce Labs is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sauce Labs writes "Robust documentation, helpful support representative, good licensing model". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, SmartBear TestComplete, CrossBrowserTesting, LambdaTest and Perfecto, whereas Sauce Labs is most compared with BrowserStack, Perfecto, LambdaTest, OpenText UFT One and Katalon Studio.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
