Bitbar vs LambdaTest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SmartBear Logo
1,523 views|1,121 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
LambdaTest Logo
4,646 views|2,917 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bitbar and LambdaTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Ability to use different frameworks.""Game testing and the API for apps are good."

More Bitbar Pros →

"LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more.""Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!""Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues.""It is a scalable solution.""The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems.""The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel.""Without a doubt, LambdaTest is one of the big reasons behind our faster deployment and better team collaboration.""The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."

More LambdaTest Pros →

Cons
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated.""Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."

More Bitbar Cons →

"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only.""The scalability is good with Amazon, but IBM had some issues.""Mobile application testing would be helpful for us.""If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic.""Sometimes, when multiple users use the tool simultaneously, it can slow down, affecting efficiency.""Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time.""Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon.""I didn't like the solution's technical support and how they communicated and tried to fix the issues of customers like me."

More LambdaTest Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is complicated. It's in the middle."
  • More Bitbar Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month."
  • "This is an affordable product."
  • "The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it."
  • "It is affordable as compared to similar SaaS solutions."
  • "LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."
  • "It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."
  • "It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."
  • "LambdaTest is paid per execution."
  • More LambdaTest Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.
    Top Answer:LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms.
    Top Answer:Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved.
    Ranking
    27th
    Views
    1,523
    Comparisons
    1,121
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    14th
    Views
    4,646
    Comparisons
    2,917
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    364
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    BrowserStack logo
    Compared 34% of the time.
    SmartBear TestComplete logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Sauce Labs logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    CrossBrowserTesting logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Perfecto logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    BrowserStack logo
    Compared 67% of the time.
    Sauce Labs logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Katalon Studio logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Tricentis Tosca logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Testdroid
    Learn More
    Overview
    Testdroid is a set of mobile software development and testing products by Bitbar Technologies Limited. Testdroid comprises three different products: Testdroid Cloud, Testdroid Recorder and Testdroid Enterprise. Testdroid provides an application programming interface through open source software available on GitHub. Testdroid can use testing frameworks, such as Robotium, Appium and uiautomator for native and Selenium for web applications, targeted for mobile application and game developers. Testdroid Cloud contains real Android and iOS powered devices, some of which are available for users. Testdroid Cloud lets users run tests simultaneously on cloud-based service. Testdroid Recorder is a tool for developers and testers for recording user-actions and producing JUnit based test cases on mobile application and games. Testdroid Recorder is available at the Eclipse marketplace. Testdroid Enterprise is a server software for managing automated testing on multiple real Android and iOS powered devices, supporting Gradle build system and Jenkins Continuous Integration.

    LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

    **Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
    You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
    The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
    Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

    **LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
    Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
    You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

    **Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
    1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
    2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
    3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
    4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
    5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
    6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
    7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
    8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
    9. API For Continuous Testing.

    Sample Customers
    Rovio, Paf, Supercell, NITRO Games, Seriously, AVG, Google, Bosch, Yahoo, Microsoft, Yandex, Mozilla, eBay, PayPal, TESCO, Cisco WebEx, Facebook, LinkedIn, skype, Subway
    Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company55%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization39%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Retailer5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise47%
    Large Enterprise37%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bitbar is ranked 27th in Functional Testing Tools while LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 21 reviews. Bitbar is rated 7.0, while LambdaTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, SmartBear TestComplete, Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting and Perfecto, whereas LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca and SmartBear TestComplete.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.