Polaris Software Integrity Platform vs Veracode comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Polaris Software Integrity ...
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
31st
Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
17th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Veracode
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
2nd
Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
194
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (2nd), Container Security (4th), Penetration Testing Services (3rd), Static Code Analysis (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Polaris Software Integrity Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode is 8.1%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories:
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
2.5%
Application Security Tools
10.0%
Container Security
2.9%
 

Featured Reviews

Use Polaris Software Integrity Platform?
Share your opinion
Deepak Naik - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 18, 2024
It's a solution our customers trust, so when we share the report they know we've done our due diligence
The main benefit of Veracode is that we can deliver better, more secure software. Our customers also trust Veracode. When we share the Veracode report, they see that we have gone through all the due diligence. Veracode aligns with SOC, ISO, and other types of certifications. It helps with compliance that Veracode has all these reporting formats. The solution provides visibility at every stage of development. We have automated almost everything through integration with Jenkins. As soon as the developer commits, it triggers the static scan for the main branches. We don't need to trigger the scan manually or do a follow-up to see if it's done scanning. The solution saves time by reporting issues and recommendations that help developers fix the reported vulnerabilities faster. I estimate that it improved developer productivity by about 10 percent.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The cost of scanning code is cheaper. It's typically $0.50 per line of code. However, it's expensive to run a high-level process that would normally require a human security expert. For example, penetration testing costs about $1,000 per application for penetration testing. The cost of these features may be too high for smaller organizations. On the other hand, Veracode's interactive application security testing is fast and cheaper compared to other software."
"Negotiate some, but their prices are reasonable."
"The pricing for Veracode is high, making it difficult for beginners to afford."
"Veracode is one of the more expensive solutions in the market, but it is worth the expense because of the eLearning and the security consultations; everything is included in the license."
"I'm unfamiliar with the solution's pricing, but it must be worth the cost from a company perspective, as we have been using it for years and have no plans to move away from it."
"It is quite good. If you adapt it for the whole organization, it is quite affordable. The pricing plans are good as compared to the other competitors, and any small, medium, or big company can easily adopt Veracode. Its cost includes deployment, training, and support for one year."
"I think the pricing is in line with the rest of the tools. I think you get what you pay for. It is certainly not inexpensive, but the value proposition is there. There are certainly cheaper tools, but I don't think we'd be getting the support that we get with those, and that is what separates this product from the others."
"Licensing is pretty flexible. It's a little bit weird, it's by the size of the binary, which is a strange way to license a product. So far they've been pretty flexible about it."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Retailer
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?
SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...
What do you like most about Veracode?
The SAST and DAST modules are great.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode?
The product’s price is a bit higher compared to other solutions. However, the tool provides good vulnerability and database features. It is worth the money.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: June 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.