GitHub Code Scanning vs Polaris Software Integrity Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitHub Code Scanning and Polaris Software Integrity Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST).
To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: June 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Polaris Software Integrity Platform?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "GitHub Code Scanning is a moderately priced solution."
  • "The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month."
  • More GitHub Code Scanning Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management.
    Top Answer:GitHub Code Scanning is a moderately priced solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten. The solution's license is… more »
    Top Answer:GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    190
    Comparisons
    160
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    337
    Rating
    10.0
    Views
    498
    Comparisons
    469
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.

    Polaris Software Integrity Platform® is an integrated, cloud-based application security testing solution optimized for the needs of development and DevSecOps teams.
    Polaris brings our market-leading security analysis engines together in a unified platform, giving you the flexibility to run different tests at different times based on application, project, schedule, or SDLC events.

    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Media Company6%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer11%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
    June 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: June 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitHub Code Scanning is ranked 20th in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 2 reviews while Polaris Software Integrity Platform is ranked 32nd in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). GitHub Code Scanning is rated 9.6, while Polaris Software Integrity Platform is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of GitHub Code Scanning writes "A highly stable solution that can be used for source code management". On the other hand, GitHub Code Scanning is most compared with SonarCloud, Coverity, SonarQube and Veracode, whereas Polaris Software Integrity Platform is most compared with Black Duck, Coverity, SonarQube and Snyk.

    See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

    We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.