Microsoft Azure vs SAP S4HANA on AWS comparison

Microsoft Azure
Read 299 Microsoft Azure reviews
  • 26,931 Views
  • 21,298 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
SAP S4HANA on AWS
Read 35 SAP S4HANA on AWS reviews
  • 4,502 Views
  • 3,771 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Microsoft Azure and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

Microsoft Azure is praised for its scalability, versatility, reliability, and wide range of services, with positive feedback on customer service and support. Users report a substantial return on investment with reasonable pricing. SAP S4HANA on AWS offers robust performance, seamless scalability, excellent integration capabilities, and comprehensive analytics, with exceptional customer support. The system provides competitive pricing, cost-effective setup, and favorable ROI, but users highlight the need for improvements in integration, reporting, analytics, interface, and performance.

Features: Microsoft Azure offers valuable features such as scalability, versatility, reliability, and a wide range of services. In comparison, SAP S4HANA on AWS stands out with its robust performance, seamless scalability, excellent integration capabilities, user-friendly interface, and comprehensive analytics.

Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Microsoft Azure is considered commendable, with users mentioning the ease and simplicity of the installation process. On the other hand, SAP S4HANA on AWS offers cost-effective setup with a straightforward and user-friendly licensing process., Microsoft Azure has shown substantial ROI by providing cost savings, increased efficiency, and improved scalability. Its diverse services and tools allow for successful project implementation and management. SAP S4HANA on AWS offers favorable ROI with significant cost savings, improved operational efficiency, seamless system integration, enhanced data analysis capabilities, and improved decision-making abilities.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure users have identified areas that need improvement, while feedback for SAP S4HANA on AWS highlights the need for enhanced integration capabilities, reporting and analytics functionalities, a more user-friendly interface, and improved performance and stability.

Deployment and customer support: The user reviews for Microsoft Azure indicate varying timeframes for establishing a new tech solution, with some users mentioning a three-month deployment period and an additional week for setup. Other users suggest that deployment and setup may refer to the same period. On the other hand, the user feedback for SAP S4HANA on AWS also mentions different timeframes for deployment and setup, but emphasizes the importance of evaluating the context in which these terms are used., Microsoft Azure's customer service receives positive remarks for their responsiveness and expertise, with users appreciating the prompt and helpful assistance provided. SAP S4HANA on AWS also provides exceptional customer service, with reliable and efficient support that users highly appreciate.

The summary above is based on 50 interviews we conducted recently with Microsoft Azure and SAP S4HANA on AWS users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS Report (Updated: May 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS
May 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 787,817 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
299
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (1st)
SAP S4HANA on AWS
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 24.1%, up from 18.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S4HANA on AWS is 4.9%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
Unique Categories:
PaaS Clouds
20.4%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Harmandeep Kaur - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 27, 2024
Offers integrated version control in building models which obviates the need to manage different versions of my models manually
We haven't actually needed to contact Azure support very often. However, the Databricks team, specifically our Service Account Manager, has been very helpful. They've reached out a couple of times to understand the types of projects we're working on and suggest additional functionalities that might be beneficial. There was also some communication with the GenAI team about potential use cases that could be integrated into our platform or future products. I've never had to directly contact an Azure support representative. The online documentation is very comprehensive, and there's a large, active community that we can leverage for troubleshooting. Basically, all the documentation we need is readily available to resolve any queries.
Read full review
AW
Nov 21, 2023
Scalable, and good for retail businesses
We use SAP S/4HANA for manufacturing, retail, and many other types of businesses We have found the retail business features to be the most valuable. There is room for improvement in terms of stability.  I have been using it for seven years. We use the most up-to-date version. I would rate the…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Microsoft has a lot of partners in this area, and they have a lot of information available online, so it's easy to get support."
"Reliable with ease of provisional services."
"Microsoft Azure has been easy to use in my experience."
"Reduces work for our IT teams and saves us a lot of time."
"One advantage of using Azure is that clients can start with a low-cost entry in terms of hardware and scale as their business and user base grows. They don't need to allocate a large budget for infrastructure upfront."
"We are satisfied with the technical support."
"The solution has enabled us to provide advanced indicators and analytics to the client on their data."
"The product is a cloud solution."
More Microsoft Azure pros
"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA on AWS is that when developed on a new structured system it can be configured."
"I appreciate the reliability and performance of SAP S/4HANA on AWS. It demonstrates high integration and stability, making it a widely used choice in various industries, including manufacturing, such as factories, carmakers, and battery production. It effectively covers a broad spectrum of business areas, which is beneficial."
"The system has the capacity to manage all these departments in a single box and they're all integrated."
"Reporting transparency and user-friendliness are the key benefit of deploying SAP S4HANA on AWS. Furthermore, the solution offers a plethora of modules that have proven to be valuable, and there are regular updates available."
"This solution has one of the most modern databases and it is very stable."
"The product efficiently manages the data center without manual intervention."
"The tool's installation is easy. I rate it an eight out of ten."
"The most valuable features of SAP S4HANA on AWS are that it's simplified and the analytical capabilities are good."
More SAP S4HANA on AWS pros
 

Cons

"Sometimes performance takes a hit on a slow network."
"Microsoft Azure needs to improve its user interface. New developers and teams have difficulty understanding its lifecycle."
"Azure ARM​ console can be a bit overwhelming at the beginning."
"Compared with other cloud solution providers, Microsoft is not good at local support."
"One key area for improvement is the Azure load balancer. Currently, it only supports virtual machines (VMs) running in the same virtual network (vNet) on the backend. They should definitely support machines or IPs running on-premises (prem) or in other Azure VNets. GCP and AWS already support that. So, Azure Load Balancer should support that as well"
"There are a number of services offered by AWS that are not yet available on Azure."
"A good strategy would be to include a feature for integrating with external ecosystems."
"The market place can be raised, and the CMT can be more sophisticated to create more opportunities for the end users."
More Microsoft Azure cons
"SAP S4HANA on AWS could improve by having more data centers because there are limited data centers in the region I am in. Amazon AWS has announced a few more data centers to be added, but they're still not 100 percent operational for SAP solutions."
"Doesn't have a common development environment."
"S4HANA is expensive. It costs much more than SuccessFactors."
"I would like to see a lower price for the solution."
"The manufacturing application system, it's not as user-friendly in S4HANA."
"The GUI is age-old, the pricing is too high for hardware and older customizations are not working consistently."
"The AI aspect of SAP S4HANA can be improved."
"I would like scalability to be improved in the future for faster performance."
More SAP S4HANA on AWS cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost could definitely be lower."
"All cloud services are expensive."
"The cost of Microsoft Azure depends on the services that are used and there can be a discount at a corporate level from Microsoft."
"The licensing price is fine."
"Pricing is very difficult to guesstimate. With so many a la carte options and individual pricing it can be a hassle to understand."
"Make use of Azure pricing calculator and you will find out that Azure Is still more reasonable that the competition and do your research, when unclear speak with your MS support."
"The cost structure is like most cloud-based services. The solution could be cheaper, it is always better to be cheaper."
"Most of the pricing from Microsoft is reasonable."
More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice
"The pricing is a little bit high."
"Compared to its competitors, SAP S4HANA on AWS is a costly solution."
"The licensing of the product is reasonable but the cost of the hardware is exorbitant."
"The price of SAP S4HANA on AWS is reasonable, given how much it costs to maintain a scratch-built system. To upgrade the support there is a fee."
"There are additional modules-wise, it's needed for modules, and also for any new functions."
"The pricing is on the higher end."
"We pay an annual subscription fee for the solution, which is slightly expensive."
"I would rate the pricing as a two and a half out of five."
More SAP S4HANA on AWS pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8586 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 14, 2013
Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison
Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…
Read full review
 

Answers from the Community

JR
Nov 7, 2021
Nov 7, 2021
Looking for a comparison chart between SAP S4 HANA on AWS and Microsoft Azure
SAP S/4HANA is a system for managing relational databases. The in-memory system, as well as the columnar structure, results in retrieving the data with better performance than RDBMS systems. You can deploy it in AWS or in Azure. Here is a brief comparison: Azure dedicates specific virtual machines and bare metal servers to run SAP HANA. SAP HANA applications run on an SAP application. With Azur...
See 2 answers
EB
Aug 26, 2021
Hello @Md Saiful Hyder , @MangeshDixit , @JeffreyVergara , @SaleemKhokhar, @HimanshuTejwani, @SathishKumar and@Enrico Boseli. Do you have any inputs/advice for @Julie Roy?  Thanks in advance!
Read full answer
LF
Nov 7, 2021
SAP S/4HANA is a system for managing relational databases. The in-memory system, as well as the columnar structure, results in retrieving the data with better performance than RDBMS systems. You can deploy it in AWS or in Azure. Here is a brief comparison: Azure dedicates specific virtual machines and bare metal servers to run SAP HANA. SAP HANA applications run on an SAP application. With Azure, you have an entire SAP application (VM) layer that includes servers, storage, and network configuration. You can deploy resources from 36 Intel with memory of 768GB to 480 Intel processors with 24TB of memory. Finally, you can combine AP and non SAP data. You can apply advanced data services, such as analytics and AI. Aws Azure Supported use cases Production, non-production Production, non-production Supported resources Up to 48TB of memory Up to 12TB Licensing Pay per use BYOL subscription Services Single and multi-node architecture. Load balancing, instance provisioning. Load balancing, clustering, Active Directory, and the HANA database. SAP S/4HANA on AWS provides infrastructure services. AWS has the advantage of making SAP HANA available, cost-effective, and fault-tolerant. With AWS you can configure a single EC2 to host SAP HANA with EBS storage and your chosen operating system. Another option is to use multi-AZ to deploy primary and secondary nodes, using one for production and another for non-production. You have two main options: First, BYOL (Bring your own license). It supports native HANA applications, S/4HANA, Business Suite on HANA, and you can have OLAP memory up to 100 TB. Second, the express edition, which is free to use for in-memory databases, but keep in mind you’ll have to stay under 32 GB. Conclusions Which is best will depend on your use cases. Azure in my opinion offers better performance for big data and AI workloads. AWS provides more reliability and redundancy.
Read full answer
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
37%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?
IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...
See all answers
Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?
One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...
See all answers
How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?
I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...
See all answers
What do you like most about SAP S4HANA on AWS?
With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP S4HANA on AWS?
I would rate the costliness of SAP S4HANA as a nine out of ten. I believe the cost of SAP S/4HANA can be a factor for smaller businesses. However, the robustness, integration capabilities, and the ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA on AWS?
I would like scalability to be improved in the future for faster performance.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 12% of the time
Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 11% of the time
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 9% of the time
Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 8% of the time
Google App Engine vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Google App Engine vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 4% of the time
More Microsoft Azure Competitors
Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS Logo
Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS
Compared 16% of the time
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS Logo
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS
Compared 7% of the time
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP S4HANA on AWS Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP S4HANA on AWS
Compared 7% of the time
Amazon AWS vs SAP S4HANA on AWS Logo
Amazon AWS vs SAP S4HANA on AWS
Compared 3% of the time
Alibaba Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS Logo
Alibaba Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS
Compared 3% of the time
More SAP S4HANA on AWS Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure
June 2024
Microsoft Azure reportDownload Microsoft Azure product report
Buyer's Guide
SAP S4HANA on AWS
May 2024
SAP S4HANA on AWS reportDownload SAP S4HANA on AWS product report
 

Also Known As

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure
SAP S/4HANA on AWS
 

Learn More

Microsoft
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
 

Overview

Windows Azure is Microsoft's cloud platform, where developers can create, deploy, and maintain their apps. This cloud application platform allows developers to concentrate on the actual applications, while it takes care of all the elements behind the apps.

Windows Azure works across multiple frameworks and languages. It is fully scalable, localized in that it is hosted globally in many datacenters, and has widespread capabilities with elements of application development, deployment, and management.

Azure is comprised of several different service modules, including Infrastructure; Web; Mobile; Dev & Test; Big Data; Media;Storage, Backup & Recovery; and Identity & Access Management.

Microsoft Azure works as a:

  1. Platform as a service (PaaS)
  2. Software as a service (SaaS)
  3. Infrastructure as a service (IaaS)

Microsoft Azure is available:

  • On-premises
  • Hybrid
  • Multi-cloud
  • At the edge

Compared to its competitors, Microsoft Azure:

  • Has more affordable features
  • Has easier migration for organizations already using other Microsoft tools
  • Has several educational resources available
  • Provides robust support
  • Is ideal for small and large businesses

Microsoft Azure Features:

  • Scalability
  • Stability
  • Flexibility
  • Azure Site Recovery
  • Active Directory
  • Monitoring features
  • Cloud-based
  • Automated tasks
  • Change capability cadence
  • Showback capabilities
  • Information protection
  • Azure Data Lake
  • Excellent portal
  • Intuitive user interface
  • Remote desktop
  • Fast provisioning
  • Data security
  • Data resiliency
  • Speed of service
  • Integrated delivery pipeline
  • Disaster recovery
  • Robust templates
  • Flexible coding languages
  • Virtual systems testing

Benefits of Microsoft Azure:

  • Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS): Because Microsoft Azure is an IaaS, organizations can deploy as well as manage applications easily and quickly. Azure also provides you with the ability to customize the cloud software to meet your specific business needs.
  • Seamless integration: Microsoft Azure is built to seamlessly integrate with existing IT departments via hybrid databases, secure private connections, and storage solutions.
  • Cost-effective: Because Azure can harmoniously exist in your business environment with your data center, it is a very cost-effective solution.
  • Analytics support: Azure is designed with built-in support that is used to analyze data and provide key insights. Azure offers Cortana Analytics, Stream Analytics, Machine Learning, and SQL services.
  • Unique storage system: Compared to other cloud services, Microsoft Azure has more data centers and delivery points, which helps create an optimal user experience and also helps deliver content faster. In addition, Microsoft Azure makes it possible for organizations to exchange content across several virtual machines.
  • Enhanced flexibility: Azure provides extreme flexibility by allowing you to choose any level of functionality you require. It also supports many of the same technologies IT teams and developers usually depend on, making it easier for them to manage.
  • Easy implementation: Microsoft Azure is easy and quick to deploy. If necessary, you can change web apps to Azure with almost zero downtime.

Reviews from Real Users:

"It is a flexible solution that is straightforward to use," says the principal consultant at a computer software company.

OmarJ., future datacenter consultant: Microsoft Azure Cloud at a tech company, adds that "The user interface is very nice and makes everything easy to use."

“You can build an environment in minutes. It's very good in terms of being an infrastructure as a service, and I found that really fascinating,” says an information technology consultant at a computer software company.

"I think Azure's level of automation to achieve efficiency or agility is valuable. I also like the change capability cadence, the showback capabilities, and understanding what our costs are," says an enterprise architect at an energy/utilities company.

Marco C., Ing. at Wolters Kluwer, says "The valuable features of Microsoft Azure are that it is cloud-based and has good storage. The storage is completely managed by Azure. We do not need to do any patching of security because it is handled by Azure which is a benefit. The solution is fully compatible with the Microsoft technology stack and is very scalable."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure is it has everything together in one place. It is one large tool with lots of small tools that are updated often," says the owner of a media company.



SAP customers of all sizes can fully realize all the benefits of the SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud. With SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud you can:

  • Achieve faster time to value with the AWS on-demand infrastructure
  • Rapidly provision infrastructure for SAP S/4HANA with no upfront cost or long-term commitment
  • Pay for only what you need Don't spend upfront costs purchasing hardware for what you can't forecast
  • Test and evaluate SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition with a free trial offering from SAP on AWS
 

Sample Customers

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.
Brigade Group, DoHome, Royal FloraHolland
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS
May 2024
Free Report: Microsoft Azure vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Azure vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.