Make vs ServiceNow Orchestration comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Make
Ranking in Process Automation
29th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ServiceNow Orchestration
Ranking in Process Automation
13th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Make is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow Orchestration is 6.4%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Yaniv Ivgi - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 5, 2023
An affordable cloud solution for automation and data manipulation
We use Make to manipulate data, cut the numbers, take this line of code, and translate it to another line of code. SaaS products use XML, and other products use JSON. You need to translate to communicate between them. You have to make a transit code between them to communicate and take the backup…
SS
Oct 6, 2022
Enables an organization to bring all its functions together, saving time and resources
The use case depends on the needs of our customers. We deploy it for business and IT workflows as well as for within IT workflows. Use cases also include auto-ticketing and auto-resolution. We have a premium partnership with ServiceNow and I'm a business manager in IT services.  The automation…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."
"Orchestration is commonly utilized by major corporations. The process of linking methods in ServiceNow, known as the RTS chain to parent methods, is executed seamlessly and efficiently. It's quite impressive and significant in its impact."
"The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in languages like Java. But along with that, there are limitation in terms of network connectivity testing and administrator faces regular challenges in conducting connectivity tests due to these limitations."
"This is a user-friendly solution where scripts can be made with ease. There are also many integration options, including Microsoft products, which gives the product a competitive edge."
"The iTerm suite is also crucial for visibility and optimization."
"Employee onboarding, de-boarding, and other service-provision features make the process easier and it saves us a lot of time."
"The data visualization is good."
"The solution effectively automates business processes."
"There are a lot of ready to use orchestration custom packs."
 

Cons

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."
"I would like a user experience module to be added."
"There should be connectors to cover at least the top industry applications, and they should be easier to configure in a plug-and-play fashion."
"The flow rate for releases and updates is very, very slow and does not meet customers' objectives for scalability."
"The automatic remediation needs enhancement, particularly integrating ServiceNow with tools like SolarWinds and Logic Monitor. It is functional, but it needs improvement."
"Efficiency of some features could be improved."
"Frequent upgrades may negatively impact the performance of instances. Therefore, for now, I don't recommend any additional upgrades."
"There is still room for more integrations. Or, it would be nice to bundle multiple products together rather than selling everything as a model as that turns out to be a bit costly."
"The deployment requires awareness among the project staff."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."
"This is an expensive product, but it is the best in the market considering the features and lack of competitors."
"It is not very expensive."
"The solution is costly and orchestrations are very expensive."
"ServiceNow doesn't give a clear cost indication. They have different contracts with different organizations and it's all about negotiation, so you don't know how they are doing at the cost level."
"It is quite expensive because we've had some customers come back and say it's quite pricey because in order for them to go ahead with Orchestration, they must have already been paying for Discovery, service mapping, and a few other things."
"In terms of price, this solution is at the higher end of what you'll find."
"The cost of the solution is based on the number of plugins, conductors and integrations used and is charged annually. The licensing cause has been increasing gradually which makes it difficult to access. Initially offer free features but over the time the charges rise which make it an expensive solution with limited features. Along with that, the integration issues persist and require additional middle where and internet connectivity for effective usage."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Make?
The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas wit...
What needs improvement with Make?
Make has a single IP. We cannot use a single IP because of the security. There are a lot of crashes when you work manually. Also, they need to provide more models. When you have an error, Make shou...
What do you like most about ServiceNow Orchestration?
The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in l...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Orchestration?
The cost of the solution is based on the number of plugins, conductors and integrations used and is charged annually. The licensing cause has been increasing gradually which makes it difficult to a...
What needs improvement with ServiceNow Orchestration?
ServiceNow Orchestration needs to improve multiple aspects in which their event monitoring system is one. The solution lacks event monitoring systems which makes them non-competitive. They need to ...
 

Also Known As

Integromat
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Buan Consulting, Armadia
experian, BEACHBODY, HealthPartners, Banosoft
Find out what your peers are saying about Make vs. ServiceNow Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.