SmartBear TestComplete vs mabl comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

mabl
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
34th
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
17th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
29th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
API Testing Tools (13th)
SmartBear TestComplete
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
10th
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
6th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
7th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
72
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of mabl is 0.4%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SmartBear TestComplete is 5.0%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
Unique Categories:
Functional Testing Tools
0.2%
Regression Testing Tools
0.4%
 

Featured Reviews

PB
Oct 27, 2023
A UI test automation tool that lets you test every desktop, web, and mobile application
At times, identifying or locating an element can be somewhat challenging. However, in a recent test update, they introduced the Optical Character Recognition (OCR) capability. This introduction has reduced the challenges to some extent, as we can now utilize OCR if the normal method doesn't work. Nevertheless, there is still significant potential for improvement in TestComplete's ability to identify various object elements. I don't have any specific concerns to mention. I have observed significant improvements in TestComplete over the past few years, especially in its support for highly dynamic object elements used in products like Salesforce Dynamics 365. In earlier versions, there were numerous challenges, but the current version is far superior to its predecessors.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing is a little above average — it could be lower."
"It comes with a high cost."
"The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive."
"SmartBear TestComplete is an expensive tool."
"The option we chose was around $2,000 USD."
"My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it."
"Buy modules on demand. If you have a four-person team and they will each automate tests only 25% of the time, it's better to buy a floating licence and share the tool during the work day."
"The price is less, compared to other products, such as QTP."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
7%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SmartBear TestComplete?
TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SmartBear TestComplete?
My company does not buy the product. It is our company's customers who require the solution.
What needs improvement with SmartBear TestComplete?
In scenarios where two of our engineers work on the same task, merging codes is a bit difficult. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement in the product. Based on what our company ...
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Arch Insurance Group, Internet Travel Solutions, CareerBuilder, LOB, Building Engines, MaestroQA, TeamLeader, Piece of Cake
Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: May 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.