Code42 Incydr vs IBM Resilient comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Code42 Incydr
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (32nd), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (15th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (42nd)
IBM Resilient
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Security Incident Response (4th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (8th)
 

Featured Reviews

SS
Mar 29, 2023
Great customization features with ability to set risk levels
If you come with the perception that this solution uses the same policies that are used in traditional DLP products, you might find Code42 doesn't work for you. You have to adapt to their philosophy, which is a more open-ended solution. If you're looking at getting granular about a particular type of data, it becomes harder to put custom variables in there. Code42 is more open-ended and identifies or discovers data that is going out rather than having someone build a policy to filter for it. If you're willing to look at DLP and data leakage from a different perspective then I'd go with 42. I rate this solution eight out of 10.
Jaliya Bandara - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 26, 2023
It has a complete stack, so you don't need to use different OEM products because you have all you need under one umbrella
What could make IBM Resilient better is if IBM increased the number of built-in integrations with different products from other vendors or third-party products. In a way, IBM Resilient is an orchestration platform, so it should allow you to orchestrate other OEMs or products from non-IBM vendors. If there were a pre-built function that lets you integrate third-party solutions with IBM Resilient, the initial setup for the solution would become easier and more flexible. Implementing or integrating other platforms with IBM Resilient would also take less time. After the solution is implemented, that's the time my company can give more recommendations on which features to add to improve IBM Resilient.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Backup and recovery have been great, but I love having the ability to keep the hybrid type build which they offer."
"It required very little ongoing maintenance once setup."
"It has quite a bit of flexibility in configuring backup sets."
"Security tools: Being able to monitor data going in and coming off our endpoints. Seeing what it is and where it's going is awesome."
"Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details."
"t has a very user friendly status bar with common errors and has logs built in to the console so we can review the issues or status of CrashPlan."
"Code42 Next-Gen DLP is scalable."
"The solution is very stable. Very rarely do we have any issues with it. We don't have to deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find it to be reliable."
"The solution is reliable in our usage."
"The product is very good at incident response."
"The UBA, User Behavior Analytics, is very good."
"As a whole, the product is stable...Technical support is very good."
"The solution is easy to use."
"This is a good solution that we recommend for customers."
"It's really simple and has a flexible interface."
"What I like most about IBM Resilient is that it has a complete stack, which means you don't need to use different OEM products because you have all you need under the IBM Resilient umbrella. You don't need to worry much about integrations and components because you're working with tested and proven architecture."
 

Cons

"​Due to recent changes that effectively abandoned an entire segment of their user base, I no longer trust nor can recommend Code42 products."
"Java, please get rid of Java."
"There doesn't seem to be any feature that is lacking."
"More security would be nice, I would love to be able to remotely brick a stolen laptop and it's hard disk drive (HDD)."
"You can't always filter out data that you'd like to."
"The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions."
"In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue."
"I think one we can improve is the compression."
"Its price needs improvement."
"It is not very straightforward to set up custom integrations, especially with services like Azure. You need an additional server for integration."
"There are shortcomings with IBM Resilient's technical support team that can be considered for improvement in the future."
"IBM Resilient could integrate better with my tools."
"The implementation could be a bit simpler."
"The response time of the support is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product needs a bit more development."
"What could make IBM Resilient better is if IBM increased the number of built-in integrations with different products from other vendors or third-party products."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."
"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."
"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."
"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."
"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."
"We could create unlimited users using the license we had purchased."
"Pricing for the solution is good, in my opinion."
"It is very expensive."
"I would rate the tool’s pricing a three out of ten. The tool’s pricing is on a yearly basis."
"There are no costs except for the support services that our company pays in addition to the licensing charges attached to the solution."
"The cost of the product is quite high."
"There is a license you need to pay for in order to use this product."
"I feel it is an expensive product when my company pays annually for renewal, support, and follow-up."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Educational Organization
6%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Code42 Next-Gen DLP?
Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details.
What needs improvement with Code42 Next-Gen DLP?
In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process,...
What is your primary use case for Code42 Next-Gen DLP?
When I first became acquainted with Code42, we were implementing it at an employer I worked with, and that was a successful implementation. I now work for a consulting firm, and we do system implem...
What do you like most about IBM Resilient?
It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Resilient?
The product is expensive. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no costs except for the support services that our company pays in a...
What needs improvement with IBM Resilient?
The configuration area to deal with during the very beginning or initial stages of the product can be the hardest part for users. Dealing with the configuration part in the beginning stages can be ...
 

Also Known As

Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.
Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.