Amazon ECR vs Harbor comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon ECR
Ranking in Container Registry
1st
Average Rating
9.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Harbor
Ranking in Container Registry
2nd
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Amazon ECR is 13.3%, down from 19.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Harbor is 31.1%, up from 24.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Registry
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

JD
Oct 16, 2023
Centralizes Docker images in one place but improvement is needed in tag manipulation
Amazon ECR helps to centralize our Docker images in one place, which is very useful to us. It helps to store our images in a private repository and connect with other products in AWS.  The most tool's valuable feature is image scanning.  Amazon ECR's manipulation capability of tags needs to be…
SD
Sep 15, 2020
Check document vulnerabilities with this cloud-native product that needs to improve in ease-of-use
Similar products we have used include Nexus (Sonatype) and JFrog (Artifactory). In the public cloud, we have also been using AWS ECR (Amazon Web Services, Elastic Container Registry) as a data registry. For vulnerability scanning, there is one more open-source tool that we have used called Anchore. We decided to switch to using Harbor because there is nothing like it amongst these tools. For Nexus and JFrog we needed some vulnerability reports that they did not provide and we are getting these reports freely from Harbor. This Harbor tool also has the advantage of being an open-source tool and costs nothing. That is why we switched.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In the case of Amazon ECR, there are various valuable features we can see. Currently, there are image-scanning capabilities that we use."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is how it organizes the code and the infrastructure."
"The autoscaling functionality is the main beneficial feature of Amazon ECR. It simplifies management, but some configurations can complicate things a bit."
"The solution is very stable."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is its ease of use and the centralized management console."
"The most tool's valuable feature is image scanning."
"What I like most about Amazon ECR is that it's swift."
"One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utilizing load balancers via AWS features allows us to manage all traffic."
"Right now this is the leading product in this category."
 

Cons

"Improving the documentation for easy understanding will help bring in more clients to use Amazon ECR."
"One area for improvement in Amazon ECR is its complexity. It's pretty complex for newbies, particularly learning about private repositories, including how to access Amazon ECR through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)."
"If there were a way to use containers as tasks directly, that would simplify things. Currently, when we use EC2 instances, scaling horizontally means increasing the instance count by five times, which might not be cost-effective. Maybe using containers directly for tasks could be a better option."
"Amazon ECR's manipulation capability of tags needs to be improved."
"It would be great if they could also provide a reference to fix the errors or vulnerabilities in the images rather than just notifying us about them."
"Amazon ECR needs to improve its downtime."
"Its support for system architecture needs improvement."
"Amazon ECR should improve the integration with Amazon CloudWatch. For example, allowing us to monitor the queues better. Additionally, some of the features could be made more accessible."
"The GUI needs to improve."
"The product should integrate better with other storage options."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective."
"My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money."
"Amazon ECR does not have a high cost."
"The solution's price is reasonable compared to its competitors"
"The cost of the product is free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
5%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon ECR?
One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utili...
What needs improvement with Amazon ECR?
Amazon ECR needs to improve its downtime.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Container Registry
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
AXA, Talking Data
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry. Updated: May 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.