We performed a comparison between Azure Container Registry and Harbor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry."What I like best about Azure Container Registry is that it's fast. It also has 24 x 7 reliability. I didn't face any downtime issues using Azure Container Registry. I also like how secure the solution is, especially as it's from Microsoft."
"Specific tokens can be used to set folder structure or restrict things like read or write access."
"The solution has built-in resiliency and replication zone availability so it is very stable."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to download, install and manage."
"Azure Container Registry is an easy-to-install, easy-to-configure, and easy-to-deploy solution."
"The scanning of Docker images is the most valuable feature."
"The continuity screen is a valuable feature."
"One of the benefits of this solution is that it's private and secure."
"Right now this is the leading product in this category."
"It should be easier to use. It can have more graphical interfaces to manage containers. At present, the handling or management of the containers is very basic."
"The solution has no areas that need improvement."
"They can improve their scalability."
"The security, dashboards, and monitoring system could be improved."
"It's not an open source, and we pay per hour to Microsoft Azure."
"Lacks the option of having access keys stored in a master key vault."
"The solution has become more popular in the last few years but I find that the technical support has not increased their knowledge base, so more knowledgeable support staff can help improve the solution."
"Implementation needs improvement. We have a lot of open, online sources. Doing a deployment is easy for us. The only issue is when we have VPN connections and we try to pull the images from Container images to the local Dockers, it slows down."
"The GUI needs to improve."
"The product should integrate better with other storage options."
Earn 20 points
Azure Container Registry is ranked 3rd in Container Registry with 16 reviews while Harbor is ranked 2nd in Container Registry. Azure Container Registry is rated 8.2, while Harbor is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Azure Container Registry writes "Configurations are quite simple with tokens that set folder structure or access levels". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Harbor writes "Check document vulnerabilities with this cloud-native product that needs to improve in ease-of-use". Azure Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, JFrog Container Registry, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Red Hat Quay, whereas Harbor is most compared with JFrog Container Registry, Red Hat Quay, Amazon ECR, VMware Harbor Registry and DigitalOcean Container Registry.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
