ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

ServiceNow IT Operations Ma...
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (2nd), Cloud Management (9th), AIOps (4th)
Splunk Infrastructure Monit...
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
15th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Monitoring Software (14th), Container Management (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of ServiceNow IT Operations Management is 2.8%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is 0.4%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Unique Categories:
Event Monitoring
18.8%
Cloud Management
1.5%
Cloud Monitoring Software
0.8%
Container Management
0.3%
 

Featured Reviews

FL
Mar 20, 2023
Useful integrations; helped us communicate better with teams in other time zones
I usually use two open objects that I need and if any requests come in, I request that the IT guys do it for me As my security department colleague is based in Australia, talking can be difficult because of different time zones. The way this solution has helped us is that it improved our…
Rodney Riettie - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 20, 2023
Helps to ingest a massive amount of raw data and use it effectively
A lot of customers had a hard time effectively searching within the data in Splunk. There is a learning curve from searches to indexes and using all the macros that we have created. It is a little difficult for somebody who has not used it quite a bit and does not have a lot of practice with it, but the AI features that we have been hearing about through Splunk will make it a lot easier for us to use human language to search this data. That is big. That is pretty powerful, and that will help a lot with our customers. At the Splunk conference, some of the talks have been about the AI platform and more effective and easier ways to search within Splunk through indexes and other things. These features will help correct some of the things with which we are having a hard time with some of our customers.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's easy to set up."
"I like the solution due to the fact that it's scalable."
"From my perspective as an asset manager, the most valuable feature of the solution is the configuration management portion, where I can actively add something to the database."
"You can improve integrations of the operation with the solution."
"I like the tool's discovery feature."
"It is a stable solution. I have not experienced any system outages during my time using the solution."
"It is a product that is familiar for a lot of users."
"It helps streamline management and processes."
"The solution's basic visibility is one of its most valuable features. So, it is a solution that is easy to use...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."
"The ability to create custom dashboards is one of the best features and that's typically why most people deploy Splunk. Users can create dashboards for just about anything."
"The most valuable feature is log reporting."
"The Add data feature lets you gather any type of log and easily analyze it."
"It is very easy to monitor multiple cloud environments. It's like a single pane of glass for us. We can use it to monitor our on-prem and both of our cloud environments as opposed to having different tools for each environment. It makes it all come together in one tool."
"It's a very easy-to-use solution."
"The tool is efficient in collecting, monitoring and evaluating logs."
"We haven't really experienced any glitches or bugs."
 

Cons

"The solution needs to add mobilization, where we can connect mobile devices or wireless devices to do wireless scanning and bring assets into the database."
"The solution's licensing model is a bit complicated. It should be simple and easy for people to understand."
"Enhancing automation-related solutions, such as Wi-Fi, porting, machinery, and product automation would help to achieve better operational outcomes."
"It should have better integrations with other solutions."
"There is a slower learning curve associated with the tool's scripting part. It is also not cheap."
"The time for deployment of ServiceNow IT Operations Management depends on many factors. It's a SaaS application, it should not take too long, but if you want to define the tool based on your processes, then it would take some time. It fully depends on the company's complexity. There are out-of-the-box product flows and if you want to use them, you can from day one. However, if you want to customize it and change it to your company's practices, then it will take more time. The setup could be faster."
"My managers would say that the price is too high. We wanted to also have the visibility version of it, but it's too expensive for us. Going for visibility would have doubled up the price."
"At times, it got cumbersome from the project management perspective. It could have been because of the way we were using it. I found Microsoft Project to be more extensive and robust than ITOM."
"The price has room for improvement."
"A lot of customers had a hard time effectively searching within the data in Splunk. There is a learning curve from searches to indexes and using all the macros that we have created. It is a little difficult for somebody who has not used it quite a bit and does not have a lot of practice with it, but the AI features that we have been hearing about through Splunk will make it a lot easier for us to use human language to search this data. That is big. That is pretty powerful, and that will help a lot with our customers."
"They need more EDR functionalities."
"The cost needs to be re-examined. It's extremely expensive to run. It's also expensive to expand. That's the number one complaint all of my customers have when it comes to Splunk. It's way too expensive compared to other solutions."
"The implementation can be more user-friendly."
"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring's data analytics can be improved by including suggestions for various types of continuous monitoring."
"Splunk would be better if some tools were integrated to be able to take action on security or network concerns."
"It does not have a user-friendly interface and it is difficult to use."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is high and may be excluding the small to medium-sized enterprise businesses."
"My customers pay for the ServiceNow IT Operations Management license annually. I'd rate the pricing based on value. ServiceNow IT Operations Management is a premium product as it has better features than competitors."
"It is expensive. It is around 10 Euros per server per month."
"It has different subscription models."
"It is moderately expensive. The pricing itself and the licensing options are depending on the model and the customization."
"ServiceNow IT Operations Management is a costly solution. I'd rate the price at ten, on a scale from one to ten with one being the lowest and ten being the highest price. Some clients do have a problem with the price, but most find that the solution is worth the cost."
"This solution offers good value but comes at a very high premium. Pricing could be reduced by 10 to 20%."
"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten since there are vendors who are cheaper."
"I would rate the price of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring as an eight out of ten, with ten being the most expensive."
"This is an expensive solution."
"I am not in that circle, but we are currently licensing based on our queries. That is working out for us. Previously, it was by volume of data, and now, we can store as much data as we want."
"It is expensive."
"The solution's pricing is competitive. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten. The price of the solution could be cheaper."
"Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored."
"Splunk has been fairly expensive, but it has been predictable."
"The product is a bit expensive considering the competition but the company may negotiate the price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ServiceNow IT Operations Management?
From my perspective as an asset manager, the most valuable feature of the solution is the configuration management portion, where I can actively add something to the database.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring?
Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored. Replacing legacy systems w...
What needs improvement with Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring?
The main drawback of Splunk for network monitoring is its limited agent deployment. Splunk excels at collecting data from servers and databases where agents can be installed. However, it cannot dir...
 

Also Known As

ServiceNow ITOM
Splunk Insights for Infrastructure
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

servicenow, TransAlta, NATS, Symantec
Entrust Datacard
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.