Panaya Test Dynamix vs Tricentis qTest comparison

Panaya Test Dynamix

Read 4 Panaya Test Dynamix reviews

379 Views
179 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tricentis qTest

Read 16 Tricentis qTest reviews

1,999 Views
1,217 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Panaya Test Dynamix

Tricentis qTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Panaya Test Dynamix and Tricentis qTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Test Management Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Tricentis qTest Report (Updated: June 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Tricentis qTest

June 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 787,817 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Panaya Test Dynamix

Ranking in Test Management Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Defect Tracking (3rd), Functional Testing Tools (23rd), Regression Testing Tools (11th)

Tricentis qTest

Ranking in Test Management Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 1.9%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis qTest is 15.9%, up from 8.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Unique Categories:

Functional Testing Tools

1.1%

No other categories found

Featured Reviews

Alain Vanhaeght

IT Project leader at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

Dec 14, 2022

More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options

For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.

Read full review

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

Oct 12, 2023

A very well-manageable tool that offers users with a great UI and UX

Our company still hasn't found a way to mark in Tricentis qTest using APIs when our automation strips run, which is a process that, if introduced in the future, can probably improve the tool. The aforementioned process happens in other tools like Azure DevOps, Zephyr, or Xray but not in Tricentis qTest. In the future, an automated test suite, triggering functionality in the test suite, and execution of automated tests, which could be marked in Tricentis qTest, would be a great addition to the tool. Tricentis qTest's technical support team needs to improve its ability to respond to queries from users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary."

"Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format."

"Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing."

"It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools."

"The test repository to follow the test progress is most valuable because we can easily create and manage a huge number of test scripts. We can copy and paste, replicate, and drag and drop many tests scripts. We can create test scripts en masse. When you have a high volume of tests, the tool is quite useful. It works well when you want to manage a lot of tests, such as you have 1,000 or more test scripts."

"The initial setup was not complex and the product itself is very easy to configure and use."

"The most important feature which I like in qTest manager is the user-friendliness, especially the tabs. Since I'm the admin, I use the configuration field settings and allocate the use cases to the different QA people. It is not difficult, as a QA person, for me to understand what is happening behind the scenes."

"The most valuable feature is reusing test cases. We can put in a set of test cases for an application and, every time we deploy it, we are able to rerun those tests very easily. It saves us time and improves quality as well."

"I found the reporting aspect to be the most valuable as it provided a comprehensive overview of the efforts needed and the workload for individual tests."

"The solution's real-time integration with JIRA is seamless."

"I like the way it structures a project... We're able to put the test cases into qTest or modify something that's already there, so it's a reusable-type of environment. It is very important that we can do that and change our test data as needed..."

"The main thing that really stuck out when we started using this tool, is the linkability of qTest to JIRA, and the traceability of tying JIRA requirement and defects directly with qTest. So when you're executing test cases, if you go to fail it, it automatically links and opens up a JIRA window. You're able to actually write up a ticket and it automatically ties it to the test case itself."

"UI and UX are pretty easy to understand without much of a problem."

"The integration with Selenium and other tools is one of the valuable features. Importing of test cases is also good."

More Tricentis qTest pros

Cons

"It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories and we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we have a network connection."

"Support is reactive and in English only."

"They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great."

"The setup of Panaya Recorder is a bit complex. Panaya is a SaaS application, but you need to install some components on your computer. You need to set up your computer to allow Panaya Recorder to work. There are five or six things to do each time you install Panaya for any user. If you miss something, Panaya Recorder doesn't work. So, it is complex to install."

"Tricentis qTest's technical support team needs to improve its ability to respond to queries from users."

"The user interface has a somewhat outdated design, which is certainly an area that could be improved."

"We feel the integration between JIRA and qTest could be done even better. It's not as user-friendly as qTest's other features. The JIRA integration with qTest needs to mature a lot... We need smarter execution with JIRA in the case of failures, so that the way we pull out the issues again for the next round is easy... Locating JIRA defects corresponding to a trait from the test results is something of a challenge."

"Could use additional integration so that there is a testing automation continuum."

"qTest offers a baseline feature where you can only base sort-order for a specific story or requirement on two fields. However, our company has so many criteria and has so many verticals that this baseline feature is not sufficient. We would want another field to be available in the sort order."

"You can add what I believe are called suites and modules. I opened a ticket on this as to what's the difference. And it seems there's very little difference. In some places, the documentation says there's no difference. You just use them to organize how you want. But they're not quite the same because there are some options you can do under one and not the other. That gets confusing. But since they are very close to the same, people use them differently and that creates a lack of consistency."

"Reporting shouldn't be so difficult. I shouldn't have to write so many queries to get the data I'm looking for, for a set of metrics about how many releases we had. I still have to break those spreadsheets out of there to get the data I need."

"The installation of the software could be streamlined. We pay for the on-premise support and they help us a lot, but the installation is something which is very command-line oriented."

More Tricentis qTest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive. Because of its cost, we couldn't deploy Panaya to a large extent. Its licensing should be improved, and there should be more license types. There should be an advanced license and a basic license."

"The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."

"It's quite a few times more costly than other tools on the market."

"The price I was quoted is just under $60,000 for 30 licenses, annually, and that's with a 26.5 percent discount."

"We signed for a year and I believe we paid $24,000 for Flood, Manager, and the qTest Insights. We paid an extra for $4,000 for the migration support."

"For the 35 concurrent licenses, we pay something like $35,000 a year."

"For me, pricing for Tricentis qTest is moderate, so that's a five out of ten. It's more affordable than my company's previous solution, which was Micro Focus ALM."

"Our license price point is somewhere between $1,000 and $2,000 a year."

"We're paying a little over $1,000 for a concurrent license."

"We're paying $19,000 a year right now for qTest, with 19 licenses. All the on-premise support is bundled into that."

More Tricentis qTest pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Panaya Test Dynamix?

The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Panaya Test Dynamix?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Panaya Test Dynamix?

Our primary use case is for our process and we have different phases where we do testing and we have what we called IT and BPA testing. So it is a combined group of IT people and business people do...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis qTest?

I found the reporting aspect to be the most valuable as it provided a comprehensive overview of the efforts needed and the workload for individual tests.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis qTest?

Based on whatever I heard, I can say that Tricentis qTest is a little costlier than other test management tools, like Jira, Zephyr, or Xray.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tricentis qTest?

The user interface has a somewhat outdated design, which is certainly an area that could be improved. Some of the modules appear to be loosely connected, but despite these aspects, our overall expe...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 56% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 8% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 6% of the time

More Panaya Test Dynamix Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 28% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 22% of the time

TestRail vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 13% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 9% of the time

SpecFlow vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 4% of the time

More Tricentis qTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

May 2024

Download Panaya Test Dynamix product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis qTest

May 2024

Download Tricentis qTest product report

Also Known As

No data available

qTest

Learn More

Panaya

Tricentis

Overview

Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

Tricentis is the global leader in enterprise continuous testing, widely credited for reinventing software testing for DevOps, cloud, and enterprise applications. The Tricentis AI-based, continuous testing platform provides a new and fundamentally different way to perform software testing. An approach that’s totally automated, fully codeless, and intelligently driven by AI. It addresses both agile development and complex enterprise apps, enabling enterprises to accelerate their digital transformation by dramatically increasing software release speed, reducing costs, and improving software quality.

Sample Customers

Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo

McKesson, Accenture, Nationwide Insurance, Allianz, Telstra, Moët Hennessy-Louis Vuitton (LVMH PCIS), and Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Tricentis qTest

June 2024

Free Report: Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Tricentis qTest

Find out what your peers are saying about Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Tricentis qTest and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Tricentis qTest report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.