Microsoft Exchange vs ProtonMail comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Exchange
Ranking in Email Applications
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
Wireless Email (1st), File Archiving (3rd)
ProtonMail
Ranking in Email Applications
10th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Email Applications category, the mindshare of Microsoft Exchange is 14.0%, down from 14.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ProtonMail is 2.9%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Email Applications
Unique Categories:
Wireless Email
41.7%
File Archiving
14.6%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

AK
Jul 7, 2022
Beneficial communication tracking, reliable, and simple installation
We are using Microsoft Exchange for internal communication between teams Microsoft Exchange has helped our company stay organized in the workplace, it makes time more efficient. The most valuable features of Microsoft Exchange are its ease of use, and simplicity of communication, and we can…
Use ProtonMail?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It would be nice if it used less resources to run on-premise."
"Its price is okay."
"There are different prices depending on the customer's use cases and amount of users. The price of the solution could improve."
"Since my company is on Microsoft Cloud, we pay for the licenses per user. Compared to volume licensing, I would say the present licensing cost is not expensive."
"They are flexible when it comes to pricing, unlike most of the other vendors I have dealt with."
"Compared to the other options in the market, the licensing costs attached to Microsoft Exchange seem reasonable."
"I rate Microsoft Exchange a four out of ten for pricing because it is quite cheap, and many companies use the solution."
"We are currently using enterprise licenses for the solution. They are different pricing models available. There are individual, cloud-based, and enterprise licenses all with different pricing models. The larger the number of users, the lesser the price. For small to medium companies like us, we feel it is expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Applications solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Computer Software Company
18%
Media Company
9%
Retailer
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Zimbra Collaboration compare with Microsoft Exchange?
Zimbra is a free, open source collaborative software suite. The features I like best are the ease of integration and the email, calendar, and collaboration server with web interface. In addition, I...
What do you like most about Microsoft Exchange?
The initial setup was straightforward and fast.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Exchange?
Compared to the other options in the market, the licensing costs attached to Microsoft Exchange seem reasonable.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Exchange, MS Exchange
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Paderborn-Lippstadt Airport, Scitec Nutrition, British Airways, InnoGames, Osteology Foundation, Franz Haniel & Cie. GmbH, NTC Contracting
Wall street journal,The New york times, The Gurdian, Forbes, Fox News
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Zimbra and others in Email Applications. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.