Informatica Data Quality vs SAP Data Quality Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Informatica Data Quality
Ranking in Data Quality
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP Data Quality Management
Ranking in Data Quality
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Data Quality category, the market share of Informatica Data Quality is 15.7% and it decreased by 22.0% compared to the previous year. The market share of SAP Data Quality Management is 5.6% and it decreased by 24.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Quality
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Artur-Kowalczyk - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 29, 2024
Offers cloud version, good connectivity and data profiling features
We had proof of concepts where certain test cases were given to improve the functionality of the vendor regarding the supply chain. So, it was a proof of concept. It was not applied in production. It was just illustrating the capabilities of the platform, and we were comparing it with other…
Rene Dorantes - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 16, 2022
Scalable, stable, and offers good technical support
SAP Data Quality Management would be better if it directly integrates with the ME system. Right now, the company has a lot of machines on the shop floor working as a standalone, so you have to use all methods to ensure that the data interface appears on the ME system and that SAP Data Quality Management records the QM results. It would be much easier if the ME system could be integrated directly with SAP Data Quality Management. What I'd like to see from SAP Data Quality Management in the future is the integration of machines on the shop floor or a feature that connects shop floor devices. I'd also like a custom dashboard in the solution, though I wonder if that's available in the new version. The old version my company uses doesn't have that. Another feature I want in the next release of SAP Data Quality Management is better communication between the ME and the SAP systems.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The profiling feature in Informatica Data Quality is incredibly effective for data governance."
"The solution is stable."
"There are a couple of valuable features. One is that it is very quick on the profiling. So, you get a very fast snapshot of the type of data that you're looking at from the profiling perspective. It can highlight anomalies in the data."
"The user interface is flexible and the visibility of the data flow is amazing."
"Seeing the data in the mapping itself is really nice."
"I give the stability a ten out of ten."
"Informatica Data Quality is a product that is worth the money."
"We are able to set rules, establish a data quality management platform, and monitor the quality."
"Our primary use case is for us to inspect the results from the product and material, and for releasing or leaving the status of the product."
"We work with API standards or norms for internal applications, so it's essential for SSE to have tests and pass those tests according to the criteria, which makes SAP Data Quality Management very important for our products."
 

Cons

"The tool's performance is an area that should be given further consideration."
"The tools required to migrate existing mappings and server rules through cloud data quality are not available."
"The ability of the product to leverage the power of big data could be improved."
"Exploring the possibility of incorporating AI capabilities that can suggest additional rules would significantly streamline our data analysis process following data profiling."
"There is room for improvement in the Data Marketplace aspect."
"Considering internal data from legacy systems, it is quite difficult to know if Informatica Data Quality meets that high level of accuracy criteria."
"The customer servive and support could be faster. There is a slow turnaround."
"Informatica is very expensive."
"SAP Data Quality Management would be better if it directly integrates with the ME system. Right now, the company has a lot of machines on the shop floor working as a standalone, so you have to use all methods to ensure that the data interface appears on the ME system and that SAP Data Quality Management records the QM results. It would be much easier if the ME system could be integrated directly with SAP Data Quality Management."
"I would like for them to develop a feature to able to record all of our inspections; so all the data can go through SAP. It's not user-friendly or easy to get further analysis, so we mostly skip this step."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Informatica is very expensive."
"I rate the product's pricing a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest price and ten is the highest price."
"The price is high, but the competitors are even higher, like Collibra."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Informatica Data Quality?
I like the connectivity and richness of features for the technical team, the maturity of the product, and that it had a cloud version. There is Informatica Cloud, and it is part of the Informatica ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Informatica Data Quality?
It's very expensive. It's subscription-based. There are several levels of subscription. The price is high, but the competitors are even higher and more experienced, like Collibra.
What needs improvement with Informatica Data Quality?
It offers integration with some of the latest data platforms, streaming platforms like Kafka, for example. And the setup of the platform is very challenging. Regarding the cloud, it is deployed in ...
What do you like most about SAP Data Quality Management?
We work with API standards or norms for internal applications, so it's essential for SSE to have tests and pass those tests according to the criteria, which makes SAP Data Quality Management very i...
What needs improvement with SAP Data Quality Management?
SAP Data Quality Management would be better if it directly integrates with the ME system. Right now, the company has a lot of machines on the shop floor working as a standalone, so you have to use ...
What is your primary use case for SAP Data Quality Management?
In the last three years, my company used SAP Data Quality Management for a manufacturing site, particularly for creating inspection lots, recording the results, and costing the inspection lots from...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SAP BusinessObjects Data Quality Management, BusinessObjects Data Quality Management
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Condé Nast, Tani, U.S. Xpress Enterprise
AOK Bundesverband, Surgutneftegas Open Joint Stock Company, Molson Coors Brewing Company, City of Buenos Aires, ASR Group, Citrix, EarlySense, Usha International Limited, Automotive Resources International, Wªrth Group, Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., Coelba, R
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Data Quality vs. SAP Data Quality Management and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.