IBM Security Guardium Data Protection vs Imperva SecureSphere Database Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2022
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security Guardium Data ...
Ranking in Database Security
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
71
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Imperva SecureSphere Databa...
Ranking in Database Security
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Database Security category, the market share of IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is 29.2% and it decreased by 0.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of Imperva SecureSphere Database Security is 30.4% and it increased by 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database Security
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Farkhund Abbas - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 11, 2022
Provides visibility, has a single console that shows all information, and collector-aggregator capabilities
Right now, we're in the development phase for IBM Guardium Data Protection, so I don't have any recommendations about additional features and room for improvement in the solution. We're very excited to work on IBM Guardium Data Protection because we are new to the solution, and we're still exploring product features. We're very excited about integrations and use case creation, and it's only after six to eight months that I'll be able to share my recommendations in terms of additional features the solution should have. We did find some difficulty in deploying IBM Guardium Data Protection here in Pakistan because of the lack of resources.
DK
Sep 21, 2020
The company's focus on their market sector makes them stand out from the competition
Imperva Security Sphere is something that I recommend any day, anytime because they are very much focused on security as a passion. So you find it has tons of capacity for scalability. It is focused on security. Even the solution's usability is very good. On a scale from one to ten (where one is the worst and ten is the best), I would rate this product as a nine scored out of ten possible points. Features that I would like to see to make it to ten-out-of-ten means that they will need to add a few things. First, they need to onboard database encryption features. Then they need to add some of the other features which they do not have that other competitors already have. They can do more to offer a broader range of features and be more feature-rich.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Setting up Guardium was easy and straightforward."
"Good data encryption and data masking features."
"Efficiency is key and IBM Guardium provides information in a heartbeat, but protects the data with military grade encryption."
"The reporting side is also very, very good, especially its flexibility which allows you to tailor the reports to whatever information you want."
"Being an IBM product it really offers security integration capabilities and robust features. Over the years, it has satisfactory met the requirements of our customers which makes it a very reliable and versatile solution."
"Its ability to find data."
"You could easily throw it onto a VM or add additional hardware. One central manager supports about a hundred managed units, so scalability is excellent.​"
"Has a great Big Data Intelligence feature."
"The integration is great."
"This is a stable product."
"The functionality is very useable and easy to understand."
"The tool happens to be very intelligent when it comes to processing policies and sounding alerts. It allows us to implement policies and measure actions against them, raising alerts accordingly."
"The most valuable feature is the automatic reports on new databases, which gives us up-to-date inventory management."
"The performance of the solution is good."
"The technical support for Imperva is super, super, super."
"The most valuable features of Imperva SecureSphere Database Security are the user-friendliness, easy-to-use interface compared to competitors, database operations do not need a specialist, and simple to manage for our security team. Additionally, the solution can show all the databases and the level of sensitivity. It can show what is more sensitive or less sensitive."
 

Cons

"One of the limitations that everyone who uses Guardium knows is its ability for back-end reporting. The ability to collect it sometimes is easier than the ability to retrieve it, use it, or give a good representation of it for incidence response or questions which come from the different people who want to use the data."
"There are features like end-to-end and S-TAP mapping, and the ability to install policies for your configuration builder. They're not there, but we'd like to see them in the next version."
"Can't be used for a NoSQL database, which is limiting."
"The biggest complaint that I hear from customers and users is that using this solution requires database skills, yet it is a security and monitoring tool."
"The analysis part of this product could be improved. It's a very comprehensive product, so the features it has complement customer requirements. But I would like to see more emphasis on analytics, and it would be great if they added machine learning. They already have analysis insights, but a comprehensive analytical feature that's already incorporated into the solution would be very helpful."
"I am struggling getting through to social."
"If IBM Guardium Data Protection could find a way to not have a lot of coding and development required to get the solution up and running it would be an advantage. The information of the agent could improve, which is necessary for us to monitor the databases would be a great benefit."
"Guardium's storage capabilities could use some improvement. I'd also like to have some better integration using digital technology or a connector."
"Its reporting can be improved. The reporting feature is currently not good enough for our clients."
"The GUI for this solution could use some improvement."
"The interface is not user-friendly."
"The only challenge I see is that SecureSphere is deployed on servers or databases which are held on physical infrastructure. However, there are databases which are hosted on cloud platforms and Imperva has a separate tool altogether for that, not SecureSphere."
"Database security from the access management perspective could be better."
"It would be better to update the solution by using a GUI that guides me, rather than through a CLI."
"Overall, it's a very good product but they could do with some modifications log-wise."
"Data encryption. Yeah, Imperva needs to pull up on data encryption and make it a standard feature to allow maybe for tokenization, encryption of data, and things like that."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Guardium has not saved us time or money."
"The price of the solution could be better."
"One of the deployments that I know of had three databases, and the yearly fees are approximately $50,000 USD."
"Guardium won mostly because of our scope and scale. It was able to perform at the scale that we wanted to use it. ​"
"The biggest challenge is the cost associated with the product, and the cost of maintaining. Everything is not translated directly to the benefits we see. There are benefits, yes, but if I were writing the check, would I buy Guardium? No."
"The product's pricing is reasonable and affordable. It is in the moderate range."
"For IBM Guardium, licensing is very simple and straightforward. There are no issues I can speak of."
"Its cost is good. With the new metric of licensing, such as PDO not being available now, customers are expecting a good price for the solution."
"The product is expensive."
"They have introduced new price models, which makes the product more affordable now."
"The price of the solution is reasonable and it requires a license."
"There is an annual licensing fee for upgrading the device."
"The cost of support for this solution is very expensive."
"The product’s price is reasonable compared to other products."
"The price of the solution is reasonable. The cost of the solution depends on the customer, they have the flex protect licensing which can vary in price."
"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and it is a good value for the money."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Security solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
9%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
9%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does IBM Guardium Data Protection compare with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security?
IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is a solution for database security from IBM that gives complete visibility, control, and analysis to secure sensitive data and comply with regulations. IBM S...
What do you like most about IBM Guardium Data Protection?
It sends out an immediate alert when there's suspicious activity.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Guardium Data Protection?
IBM solutions have fair price strategy, and operates on a yearly basis. If it's a SaaS solution, then you can opt for yearly basis.
 

Also Known As

InfoSphere Guardium, Guardium, IBM Guardium
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
BlueCross BlueShield, eHarmony, EMF Broadcasting, GE Healthcare, Metro Bank, The Motley Fool, Siemens
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Guardium Data Protection vs. Imperva SecureSphere Database Security and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.