![Fujitsu Eternus DX8000 [EOL] vs. Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform report](https://www.peerspot.com/assets/media/images/icons/pdf-80836ec55e578300f3745ed6bfc69a24a4e8d0bc.svg){kind=icon}
![Fujitsu Eternus DX8000 [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,f_auto,q_auto,w_64/fec7t6kXowPEjxA23UmPsHUa.png)
![Fujitsu Eternus DX8000 [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,f_auto,q_auto,w_30/fec7t6kXowPEjxA23UmPsHUa.png){kind=small}
![Fujitsu Eternus DX8000 [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,f_auto,q_auto,w_40/fec7t6kXowPEjxA23UmPsHUa.png){kind=small}
We've dealt recently with virtual storage. We use the 500-series. The main benefit of the solution is its reliability. The solution has a pretty long history of working with different industries. It's easy to coordinate experience. When my customers brought up potential issues with the Hitachi consultant, they seemed to always be able to find a solution to the problem or questions. The Hitachi roadmap, in terms of adopting new technologies, is very strong. Its roadmap is important to our organization's strategy. We are extremely satisfied with the solution. We've been working with them for more than 20 years. We'd be very likely to recommend the solution to others. I'd give it a ten out of ten in terms of the likelihood of recommending it to others. The IOPS and latency are okay, however, they aren't the best. There are others on the market that handle it better. They are pretty good with their approach, however. The customer won't complain too much. We have SQL, for example, and it works quite well.
