Freshdesk vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Freshdesk
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Customer Experience Management (4th), Field Service Management (3rd), Help Desk Software (9th), Knowledge Management Software (3rd)
OpenText Service Manager [EOL]
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Help Desk Software category, the market share of Freshdesk is 3.8% and it decreased by 6.9% compared to the previous year. The market share of OpenText Service Manager [EOL] is 1.7% and it decreased by 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Help Desk Software
Unique Categories:
Customer Experience Management
13.6%
IT Service Management (ITSM)
1.8%
 

Featured Reviews

Ehwsf Duhsf - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 2, 2023
Has a smooth ticketing system, which helps us give out customers support
We are using the free version. We are using it for the ticketing system, which helps us give support to our customers. We have almost 200 people using Freshdesk during our working hours Whenever our customers are in any need of support, they present their request via email or sign in to the…
TK
Aug 1, 2022
Customizable, flexible, and reliable
The initial setup is not difficult. However, adjusting to the business requirements generally depends on the version, of course. If you have the product process designer, maybe it is very much easier, however, in an earlier version, it was rather difficult to develop since you had the object control and it was old-fashioned in terms of style. If you have a process designer, of course, when you start with a process designer, it's much easier. I'd rate the ease of deployment at a four out of five. If you are doing it out of the box, it generally only takes one day to set everything up. It was implemented generally in the high availability solution. Each component is running separately, so we focused on the high availability during the setup. We have a few people that can handle deployment and maintenance tasks. They are admins.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The user experience on the platform itself is fantastic. The UI is clean and uncluttered, so it's easy to find any information about your customer or the issue at hand. You can find out the person responsible for that particular issue, what the problem is, who the stakeholders are, and how to resolve it. There are lots of tools that will help you do that as well."
"Their knowledge base is phenomenal. The way that it learns from our users is awesome, and responses are really awesome as well. It does a pretty good job of picking up what's needed. The knowledge bases are great."
"It is quite easy to program custom apps and integrate them."
"Its simplicity is most valuable. It is easy and simple, and it requires negligible training effort. I don't spend all my time goofing around trying to find stuff in the ticketing system."
"It generated reports for us, which helped us identify the status of requests and the aging of requests."
"I like that it's very user-friendly. The way they designed this application, any layperson can just do some drag and drop actions and use it. It's not that difficult. It's also easy to implement. The most important thing is, you don't need to go to this application to create a ticket. You just send out an email, and the ticket is created automatically. I have never seen a feature like this before."
"Freshdesk significantly improved our customer issue resolution process. We can now easily record and track all customer requests, ensuring that no tickets are lost."
"Technical support is outstanding."
"The workflow engine that standardizes and globalizes the process steps. It drives people through the process by standardization and automation."
"Incident management is the most valuable because we're using it to manage tickets for an accounting system. With the reports that are available, it allows us to track and identify trends at the type and item level. It also helps us in managing the workload better than what we had in Remedy, which is what we were using before 2013."
"Sometimes, customization is simple. The version we are using now has a nice interface."
"It's pretty well-structured in modules."
"It's easy to scale."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The design has been revamped in terms of GUI. The current interface is quite easy to read."
"Service Manager does what it should, but it's quite outdated."
 

Cons

"I would like to see a little bit more color in the solution."
"There are a few things we have asked for, like a forward button. When a ticket comes in, we forward it, but it doesn't sync up with the forward. That is the one they have to rework. The other is when we forward the ticket, it doesn't go all, or certain things don't go with it. We have told them about it, and they are working on it. It would be better if they gave us a more standard reporting template. Although they already have some, many aren't usable. It would be easier if we had more templates to work with."
"While it's good for a small number of tickets, definitely in the future, we will require something more powerful."
"It should enhance its service and its reporting capabilities."
"If Freshdesk had forms in it so that I could go to the portal and fill out a service request, that would improve it immensely and make it more valuable for enterprise customers, but that's not a current functionality. You can't have a certain catalog of any type. You can't be like, "Hey, I want to just go submit a ticket," and then type in. You can't prompt them to ask anything. It is just a blank form."
"It would be helpful to pull reports or schedule them based on agents, users, ticket numbers, or responses."
"Asset management and branding are two areas in the solution that have scope for improvement."
"The reporting, analysis modules and insights capabilities for this solution could be improved."
"The solution does not interface well with other products and is difficult to implement."
"We aren't able to take emails that come in and turn them into tickets, especially when it comes to attachments. When an email has an attachment, like a screenshot, it is a very cumbersome process, and it does not work very well. I shouldn't have been paying technicians to cut and paste attachments from an email into the ticketing system. It should do that automatically. Other solutions are able to do that. This is something that needs to be improved. Test manager and knowledge management areas are probably amongst the worst parts of this solution. We try to use this solution for knowledge management, but it is not user-friendly. Therefore, it has limited ROI as you need to spend time to try and fully capitalize on the knowledge management system."
"The user interface is very clunky. It's only now beginning to be a web-based interface, but for now it's still very clunky."
"It needs good integration with the configuration database, that's lacking at the moment, It's not that good."
"Service Manager is at the end of its life. The architecture, performance, and look are all way behind."
"It, still, has a bit of more of improvement possibilities in the codeless part. But, I can see that they are working on it, so that's quite good as well."
"I think one area which is the most painful from my point of view is if you need to integrate a lot of the tools, and being able to make that a lot more seamless."
"Pure cloud-based native functionality is lacking."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Freshdesk was the best solution with the best price. It was cost efficient and included all the features that we needed."
"We use a licensing model only so we pay for the number of agents we have configured in the system only."
"The pricing is pretty manageable and acceptable."
"The price could be better, but it's okay. Compared to ServiceNow and JIRA, Freshworks offers a competitive price. There are also additional licensing costs because you need Microsoft Outlook. Each new email account costs around $15 to $19."
"It was definitely not expensive. It was two grand or maybe three grand total for a year. It has just straight and simple standard licensing fees. There is no additional fee."
"We use a combination of Freshdesk, Freshservice, and Freshchat. We use the whole suite. Weirdly enough, we pay more for Freshdesk than we do for Freshservice. I would rate it a three out of five in terms of pricing. You can get different bundles, and you can always move to different plans that are standard. Freshservice can go anywhere from $19 up to $120 per agent, per month. There is such a wide range, and it is very customizable to your needs."
"We pay approximately $70 per agent to use Freshdesk. We have 10 agents, which is approximately $700 or $800 per month. It is a fixed license, there are not any additional fees."
"It is costly."
"I pay for Service Manager on a yearly basis, and the price is reasonable - I would rate it five out of ten."
"The license is not cheap."
"I would say that identify your requirements and pay for the support to implement and test those requirements, and then hope that you did a good job because the cost of their service is fairly expensive."
"HP Service Manager has moderate pricing."
"Micro Focus Service Manager is a little cheaper than other options. You have to pay a monthly subscription fee."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Help Desk Software solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Media Company
6%
Retailer
6%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Freshdesk?
Freshdesk significantly improved our customer issue resolution process. We can now easily record and track all customer requests, ensuring that no tickets are lost.
What needs improvement with Freshdesk?
I would like to see improvements in the account management aspect, having a customer portal for better visibility into my subscription, invoices, and trouble tickets. Additionally, more flexibility...
What is your primary use case for Freshdesk?
I use Freshdesk to manage IT support tickets for our team of 15 IT professionals across multiple countries. It has been effective in ticket management, and we find the price-to-functionality ratio ...
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Service Manager?
The product's technical support services need improvement.
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Service Manager?
We use the product for infrastructure, profile, and incident management.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Service Manager, HPE ITSM, HPE Service Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honda, 3M, Hugo Boss, Petronas, Sony Pictures, The Atlantic, goodreads, Clear Channel Radio, Penn University of Pennsylvania, unicef, Kuoni, Movember
resultspositive, Globicon
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, BMC and others in Help Desk Software. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.