Flux vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Flux
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Managed File Transfer (MFT) (35th), Workload Automation (31st)
Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
Release Automation (3rd), Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Flux is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 5.4%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Unique Categories:
Release Automation
4.8%
Configuration Management
15.5%
 

Featured Reviews

it_user4206 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 10, 2013
User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows.
* User friendly - nice web based designer * Easy to integrate * Extensible - can create your own Java actions to orchestrate your custom business process * Complex job pinning and scheduling across a cluster of machines * Easy to use API for embedding it inside of other enterprise Java…
RM
May 8, 2024
Makes automation easy and helps with standardization
There should be consistency. I know that it is always changing, but when we are trying to get some users to do something in basic Ansible that they are not really interested in doing but their job requires them to do it, they start finding inconsistencies. A good example of that is that we have people who are trying to automate things with Windows and Active Directory. There is a community version of the Windows collection that deals with Active Directory. You can use a lot of that code as it is described. It works with the certified Microsoft Active Directory collection if you take the same information because there are the same parameters and values, and the only thing that changes is the collection name. If you switch that out, it does not work, so having a new person run into a problem that even a seasoned person cannot understand does not work. It turns them off. You want them to have success early on. Sometimes in Ansible, you run into some inconsistencies that you do not understand and then you are concerned because it says, "We are going to deprecate this." You are like, "How long do I have to keep using this thing that is going to be deprecated before I have to move on to this other thing?" That just does not seem to work.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"You don't need to buy agents on servers or deploy expense management when using the solution, which affected our decision to go with it."
"The solution is inexpensive compared to other products."
"The pricing is okay."
"Customers need to pay yearly for the license."
"I don't see the pricing or licensing features, but from what I understand, it is fairly reasonable."
"Users have to pay a per-node cost of around $ 100 per node."
"If you only need to use Ansible, it's free for any end-user, but when you require Ansible Tower, you need to pay per Ansible Tower server."
"It’s an open-source tool."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
8%
Educational Organization
26%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?
Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
What do you like most about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?
The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Ansible
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MetLife DHL Express The Clearing House Payments Company ADP Bank of New York Mellon Conway, Inc Carnegie Mellon University
HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: June 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.