Elastifile vs NetApp AFF comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastifile
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
File System Software (12th), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (25th), Public Cloud Storage Services (23rd)
NetApp AFF
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
281
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (2nd), NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Elastifile?
Share your opinion
Anna Sofo - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 15, 2023
Since switching, our clients have reported improved performance and reduced latency
We recommend NetApp for all our clients that have traditional infrastructures with two servers and some companies that are in manufacturing or the public sector. We have many different experiences with NetApp NetApp AFF has helped our clients simplify their infrastructure while delivering high…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Disk level encryption is already in the solution, but it is very costly. Its pricing should come down."
"It consolidates a lot of our storage into one or two chassis, which makes money savings in our data center."
"It is relatively cheap compared to other vendors."
"NetApps offers a lot of different options. Just take your time and work with the consulting teams. Lay out what your needs are to ensure you are purchasing what will help you be successful."
"It depends on how you look at things, but they are in a higher price range."
"The only area where the product has room for improvement is the cost."
"Obviously depending on the price point, NetApp is obviously a little more expensive than your generic Dell SAN solution or whatever."
"Once we did get into the NetApp ecosystem, we realized that the cost effectiveness was greater than we originally thought."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File System Software solutions are best for your needs.
789,135 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user186357 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 28, 2015
NetApp vs. XtremIO
Is there another storage platform as feature rich as NetApp FAS? I think it is fair to say that NetApp FAS running Clustered Data ONTAP is a very feature rich platform – the move to the clustered version of ONTAP has brought many next-generation features including Scale-out and Non-disruptive…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
61%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is the Biggest Difference Between Dell EMC Unity and NetApp AFF?
Well, Is one thing NetApp Storage has vs other brand is the mix of protocol CIFS with NFS booth working together in the same volume that features is difficult to find in other Storage but the flexi...
What is the Biggest Difference Between Dell EMC Unity and NetApp AFF?
This question is very dependent on your requirements. Both are among the best in the field. Of course, the intended cost is decisively based on the Gartner magic quadrant storage 2020 Net app compa...
What is the Biggest Difference Between Dell EMC Unity and NetApp AFF?
The answer depends on your needs and budget. If you want high performance (who doesn't) or let's say the latency matters more than IOPS for your needs, Netapp AFF is the right choice. You can appro...
 

Also Known As

No data available
NetApp All Flash FAS, NetApp AFF, NetApp Flash FAS
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Banca Intesa SanPaolo, eww ITandTEL, eww ag, Corner4, Linfosys, sigmavista it consulting, Rideau
DreamWorks Animation, FICO, Yahoo! Japan
Find out what your peers are saying about Nasuni, WekaIO, Oracle and others in File System Software. Updated: June 2024.
789,135 professionals have used our research since 2012.