Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs NGINX App Protect comparison

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. NGINX App Protect

Download the complete report

Helped 787,779 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare Web Application ...

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NGINX App Protect

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Security (16th), API Security (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is 7.1%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NGINX App Protect is 2.1%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Unique Categories:

No other categories found

Container Security

0.2%

API Security

2.3%

Featured Reviews

Stefan Rusu

Senior DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

Nov 1, 2023

Improves security posture by blocking bad actors

I use Cloudflare Web Application Firewall to stop attacks on web application firewalls The product has improved our security posture by blocking bad actors. The blocked logs are difficult to read at times. I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten. I rate the product's scalability a…

Read full review

Sukkarin Ruensukont

Information Security Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jul 6, 2022

Beneficial reverse proxy, effective load balancer, and helpful support

NGINX App Protect can be used as a reverse proxy, internet controller, and for caching NGINX App Protect has improved our organization by using the load balancer feature. The most valuable feature of NGINX App Protect is the reverse proxy. The price of NGINX App Protect could improve. I have…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It protects web applications efficiently."

"I'm highly satisfied. It's remarkably user-friendly, enabling me to quickly identify issues, and deploy solutions, and it offers the necessary features."

"The product has a valuable security control functionality."

"Technical support has a very fast response time and they are helpful."

"The product has improved our security posture by blocking bad actors."

"The solution protects our application, which runs on the HTTP protocol, from DDoS attacks."

"We like that there's load balancing, firewall capabilities, DDoS protection, et cetera, all covered by Cloudflare."

"The Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's most valuable feature is its ease of configuration."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall pros

"We were looking for a product that is capable of complete automation and a container based solution. It's working."

"NGINX App Protect has complete control over the HTTP session."

"NGINX App Protect is stable."

"The most valuable feature of NGINX App Protect is its flexibility."

"It is a very good tool for load balancing."

"The initial setup was simple and took three to four days."

"The most valuable feature of NGINX App Protect is the reverse proxy."

"NGINX App Protect's best features are auto-learning, which creates a profile of applications that are deployed, bot protection, and force protection, which lets you configure your brute force policy and alert for and prevent brute force attacks."

More NGINX App Protect pros

Cons

"The reporting could be more granular."

"I have experienced some difficulties with Cloudflare's support as a customer based in India."

"The solution's learning curve can still be further reduced"

"The accuracy of the Cloudflare Web Application Firewall could be improved by reducing the number of false-negative alerts."

"The platform's control features related to real-time authentication and response time need improvement."

"Cloudflare Web Application Firewall should improve visibility for a customer."

"If they add logs history within the Cloudflare offering, that would be a great benefit."

"Its stability could be better."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall cons

"Right now, the tool doesn't provide an option revolving around update feeds, specifically the signature update option in the UI."

"The solution needs to be improved in the e-commerce portal."

"The configuration needs to be more flexible because it is difficult to do things that are outside of the ordinary."

"The setup of NGINX App Protect is complex. The full process took one week to complete. Additionally, we had to change the network infrastructure platform which took one month."

"Its technical support could be better."

"The product's user interface is an area with shortcomings as it can be quite confusing for users, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The dashboard could provide a more comprehensive view of the status of the connections."

"NGINX App Protect could improve security."

More NGINX App Protect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions."

"It starts at $20 and can easily go up to $200 monthly"

"We pay $210 per month for CloudFlare WAF."

"The solution is expensive."

"Cloudflare offers different types of subscriptions for businesses, enterprises, and personal users, and the pricing is negotiable."

"The solution's pricing option needs to be more transparent for enterprise clients."

"The annual licensing fee is $10,000 USD."

"The pricing model is very straightforward compared to the competition. You just pay per month for the product and usage."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall pricing and cost advice

"NGINX App Protect is expensive."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"The price of NGINX App Protect is approximately $3,000 annually. All of our licenses are observed by a managed service partner."

"The price of NGINX App Protect is not much different from the products that fall under the leader category of Gartner Magic Quadrant."

"There is a monthly or annual subscription to use NGINX App Protect. There are not any additional costs to the subscription."

"There are no additional fees."

"Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."

"The pricing is reasonable because NGINX operates on an instance basis."

More NGINX App Protect pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

25%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

The product has a valuable security control functionality.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions.

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

The platform's control features related to real-time authentication and response time need improvement.

What do you like most about NGINX App Protect?

It's very easy to deploy.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NGINX App Protect?

NGINX App Protect is expensive.

What needs improvement with NGINX App Protect?

The solution needs to be improved in the e-commerce portal.

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Comparisons

Compared 27% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 17% of the time

AWS WAF vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 14% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 10% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 2% of the time

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Competitors

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs NGINX App Protect

Compared 17% of the time

AWS WAF vs NGINX App Protect

Compared 14% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs NGINX App Protect

Compared 13% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs NGINX App Protect

Compared 12% of the time

Noname Security vs NGINX App Protect

Compared 7% of the time

More NGINX App Protect Competitors

Product Reports

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Download Cloudflare Web Application Firewall product report

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report

NGINX App Protect

Download NGINX App Protect product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare WAF

NGINX WAF, NGINX Web Application Firewall

Learn More

Cloudflare

Overview

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

NGINX App Protect application security solution combines the efficacy of advanced F5 web application firewall (WAF) technology with the agility and performance of NGINX Plus. The solution runs natively on NGINX Plus and addresses some of the most difficult challenges facing modern DevOps environments:

Integrating security controls directly into the development automation pipeline
Applying and managing security for modern and distributed application environments such as containers and microservices
Providing the right level of security controls without impacting release and go-to-market velocity
Complying with security and regulatory requirements

NGINX App Protect offers:

Expanded security beyond basic signatures to ensure adequate controls
F5 app‑security technology for efficacy superior to ModSecurity and other WAFs
Confidently run in “blocking” mode in production with proven F5 expertise
High‑confidence signatures for extremely low false positives
Increases visibility, integrating with third‑party analytics solutions
Integrates security and WAF natively into the CI/CD pipeline
Deploys as a lightweight software package that is agnostic of underlying infrastructure
Facilitates declarative policies for “security as code” and integration with DevOps tools
Decreases developer burden and provides feedback loop for quick security remediation
Accelerates time to market and reduces costs with DevSecOps‑automated security

Sample Customers

crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk

Information Not Available

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. NGINX App Protect