Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiEDR
Sponsored
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (12th)
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
107
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (8th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (8th)
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Privileged Access Management (PAM) (6th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the market share of Fortinet FortiEDR is 5.0% and it increased by 36.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of Check Point Harmony Endpoint is 4.0% and it increased by 53.8% compared to the previous year. The market share of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 1.2% and it increased by 22.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Unique Categories:
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
7.4%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
4.5%
 

Featured Reviews

AE
May 1, 2023
Easy to configure and use, and improved our customer satisfaction
We work with the end-to-end Fortinet portfolio, especially their UTM firewall, anti-APT, and EDR solutions Fortinet has improved our customer satisfaction. This is primarily what I see. Fortinet FortiEDR is easy to use. It is easy to deploy, manage, and configure. Fortinet helps free up around 14…
Ajenthan Aiyathurai - PeerSpot reviewer
May 30, 2024
Good monitoring and visibility with compliance capabilities
We use this solution for our desktops, laptops, servers, and selective mobile devices. It offers real-time protection against malware and other malicious threats is superb.  Our previously used antivirus has not been able to identify certain threats. Check Point Harmony did it. That is a key…
EN
Aug 15, 2023
A strong part of our zero-trust architecture that makes it easy to manage privileged access
One area that has room for improvement is in managing the credentials for network devices. The solution works fine for servers running Windows 10, but it's not very functional or smooth in operation for servers running Linux and Unix operating systems. There could also be some improvement in integrating with a number of solutions. Though CyberArk keeps developing, improving, or increasing its integrations with other solutions, it could do better. I would also like the initial setup to be easier because we have to engage the services of a partner when setting up the solution. Moreover, the documentation for setup is restricted to partners only. You can get training on the administration of the solution, but the setup and getting some support documents are reserved for partners only. If there were a better way to get this information out there or to make it more accessible, that would reduce the complexity of setting up the solution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"It is stable and scalable."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"They have a great knowledge base that you can leverage as a user."
"The graphical interface is very easy to use and intuitive, which greatly facilitates the work and greatly facilitates the work and the location of threats on the users' computers."
"The best thing is that it fits into all environments, which gives any organization a chance to use it intuitively without worrying about the nature of their industry."
"It is easy to install from the cloud."
"The communication with the console is very dynamic and remote, without the need to return to the computer locally."
"Cost-wise it's cheaper than other options."
"The most valuable features of the solution are web protection and threat prevention."
"The tool minimizes the impact of a breach with autonomous detection and response."
"The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features."
"I like that you can remove the admin rights from the user's computer and have control over the environment. That means you can delete the local admins and grant them proper privileges with the console. So, they will get proper permissions for applications they need, but we don't have to do it. In the domain where we don't have control, the user can only do specified actions, but not all of them."
"It offers great performance."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management."
"The most valuable feature is that it does lifecycle management and that it will change to whatever the end target is."
"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."
"We can do both server and endpoint protection."
 

Cons

"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"The product updates are a manual process for my administrator and can take several hours out of his day."
"The solution needs more alerts to warn of attacks."
"It blocks safe URLs sometimes when there are network interruptions."
"A couple of times, we experienced some sales issues."
"It would also be great to include DLP capabilities for the endpoint so that we do not have to deploy additional agents on servers or PCs or use additional products."
"They should provide bandwidth regulation, so we can monitor and regulate bandwidth."
"The solution has limitations if it's hosted on-prem or as a SaaS."
"The solution needs better reports and centralized logs."
"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"The installation process is pretty difficult."
"The solution can be complex to use at times."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be made more flexible."
"They need much better integration with Azure AD."
"The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The solution is not expensive."
"I know it is tough to get big budget additions up front, but I highly recommend deploying environment wide and adding the forensic service."
"Offered at a high price"
"The pricing is good."
"The pricing is typical for enterprises and fairly priced."
"The price is comprable to other endpoint security solutions."
"I'm not familiar with pricing, but it looks a bit costly compared to other vendors I think."
"Check Point Harmony Endpoint's pricing is more competitive than any other vendor."
"We pay roughly 80,000 Swedish krona per year. When it comes to the firewall, it's roughly 150,000 Swedish krona yearly. There's also maintenance, of course, which is roughly 10,000 krona per month."
"I rate Check Point Harmony Endpoint's pricing a seven out of ten because it is a little high."
"Check Point Harmony Endpoint is cost effective."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"Licensing comes free in that first year or is included in the base package. From a commercial point of view, it really just is the renewal cost, rather than a one-time fixed cost or buy-in."
"The price of Check Point Harmony Endpoint is comparable to SonicWall. The price could be a bit lower."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"It is an expensive solution."
"The professional services for one eight-hour day would be $1,800."
"I think that it was in the range of $200,000 that had to get approved."
"The product's license is easy to procure."
"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive."
"Pricing depends on how many devices you use. Right now, on-premise, it costs us a little, but it's worth it. It seems like the cloud solution is much more expensive. We got this solution one year ago, and it's like we bought the solution, and now they are not going to support it on-premise anymore. We are in the implementation phase, and we missed this, and we already paid for the licenses. This is wasted time from my perspective, and CyberArk should be more customer-friendly."
"The solution requires an annual license to use it. There can be some extra costs in some cases."
"The tool is priced high. I would rate its pricing an eight out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Construction Company
7%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Fortinet's FortiEDR and FortiClient?
I suggest Fortinet’s FortiEDR over FortiClient for several reasons. For starters, FortiEDR guarantees solid protectio...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiEDR?
We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiEDR?
We license it per employee, so as long as the employee count remains the same, the licensing won't change. We have it...
What do you like most about Check Point Harmony Endpoint?
It scans all the endpoints in your cloud and on-premises for vulnerabilities, threats, and malware attacks.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Harmony Endpoint?
The product is averagely priced. The product price is neither very high nor too low. The tool is not really expensive.
What needs improvement with Check Point Harmony Endpoint?
The solution does not support some endpoints, such as iPhones, iPads, and some operating systems. Some endpoints were...
Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no sh...
What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.
 

Also Known As

enSilo, FortiEDR
Check Point Endpoint Security, Endpoint Security, Check Point SandBlast Agent
Viewfinity
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Financial, Healthcare, Legal, Technology, Enterprise, Manufacturing ... 
Boston Properties, Independence Care System, Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre (MCEC), Courtagen Life Sciences, Carmel Partners
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.