Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs CloudPassage comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (5th), Cloud and Data Center Security (7th), Container Security (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (5th), Compliance Management (4th)
Check Point Harmony Email &...
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (7th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (5th)
CloudPassage
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
41st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (44th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) category, the mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 1.6%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudPassage is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
Unique Categories:
Vulnerability Management
1.6%
Email Security
6.1%
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
0.2%
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
0.1%
 

Featured Reviews

AK
May 7, 2024
Is user-friendly, reduces false positives, and improves security posture
Having too many resources with platform access made misconfigurations more likely. PingSafe addressed this by helping us configure everything according to best practices, helping improve our security posture. PingSafe is easy to use. Evidence-based alerts help us mitigate the priority issues that are detected. The proof of exploitability in evidence-based reporting is helpful. The offensive security engine strengthens our organization's security posture by validating potential attacker paths and prioritizing vulnerabilities with the highest likelihood of being exploited in a breach. Infrastructure as Code facilitates the identification of pre-production issues within our Cloud Formation Templates and Terraform configurations. PingSafe has been instrumental in ensuring our strong cloud security posture, effectively helping us manage and mitigate risks. PingSafe helped our team reduce the number of false positives. PingSafe plays a key role in strengthening our risk posture. By providing alerts, it assists both our information security and security assessment teams in identifying and mitigating potential threats, ultimately improving our overall security position. It has improved our mean time to detection by 30 percent and effectively reduces our average time to resolve incidents. By providing valuable information, PingSafe empowers our team to quickly diagnose and rectify problems. It has improved the collaboration of our cloud security application developers and AppSec teams. PingSafe has helped save engineering time by 50 percent.
AshleyMorales - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 21, 2023
Good DLP and threat prevention and helpful centralized management
The company handles confidential information, such as clients' financial data, and it is important to keep that information secure to comply with certain regulations.  One of the important challenges was to counteract the amount of phishing, ransomware attacks, and accidental leaks of information…
AA
Jul 19, 2017
​CloudPassage has a bunch of features. Be sure you understand all of them and how to extract value to your organization.
Policies are very easy to manage on a day-to-day basis. With few clicks in their cloud management portal, you can implement and change security policies in thousand of servers. This feature allowed us to implement changes in our environment much faster Before CloudPassage, the management of…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Our organization is growing steadily, so our infrastructure is expanding, and we're managing more technical resources. Singularity Cloud Security helps us track our resources so that we don't get lost in the overwhelming volume of things and ensures we follow best practices. The solution gives us better visibility into our resources and enables faster resolution."
"We noted immediate benefits from using the solution."
"We use the infrastructure as code scanning, which is good."
"With PingSafe, it's easy to onboard new accounts."
"Cloud Native Security helps us discover vulnerabilities in a cloud environment like open ports that allow people to attack our environment. If someone unintentionally opens a port, we are exposed. Cloud Native Security alerts us so we can remediate the problem. We can also automate it so that Cloud Native Security will fix it."
"Cloud Native Security is user-friendly. Everything in the Cloud Native Security tool is straightforward, including detections, integration, reporting, etc. They are constantly improving their UI by adding plugins and other features."
"PingSafe offers three key features: vulnerability management notifications, cloud configuration assistance, and security scanning."
"The tool identifies issues quickly."
"The anti-phishing feature is the solution's best feature."
"As a comprehensive solution, Check Point offers a very granular and best-in-class experience."
"Its characteristics are adapted to the most modern threats."
"I can count the number of endpoints, emails, and collaborations being used in the environment."
"In my opinion, it's one of the best products. It does protect other things like Slack and Salesforce, which are more about communication."
"As with most of the other Check Point products, the CloudGuard SaaS has the advanced visibility of the events and alerts."
"It is very intuitive. It is a point and click type of deal."
"The solution helps to block spam emails."
"Policies are very easy to manage on a day-to-day basis."
"Key features are the Software Vulnerability Assessment and the CSM, which is the configuration check."
 

Cons

"The integration with Oracle has room for improvement."
"Whenever I view the processes and the process aspect, it takes a long time to load."
"Sometimes the Storyline ID is a bit wacky."
"Bugs need to be disclosed quickly."
"PingSafe's current documentation could be improved to better assist customers during the cluster onboarding process."
"For vulnerabilities, they are showing CVE ID. The naming convention should be better so that it indicates the container where a vulnerability is present. Currently, they are only showing CVE ID, but the same CVE ID might be present in multiple containers. We would like to have the container name so that we can easily fix the issue."
"Their search feature could be better."
"We use PingSafe and also SentinelOne. If PingSafe integrated some of the endpoint security features of SentinelOne, it would be the perfect one-stop solution for everything. We wouldn't need to switch between the products. At my organization, I am responsible for endpoint security and vulnerability management. Integrating both functions into one application would be ideal because I could see all the alerts, heat maps, and reports in one console."
"The left-hand feature can be made more granular for the implementation of the policy."
"The NAVEX metrics that I have been using on the CloudGuard dashboard cannot be exported. If they were to add report exporting capabilities on each of metric objects on the dashboard, that would be awesome."
"I have learned enough to make the product stable. However, the stability has some challenges."
"The business team should be further expanded, and more peer feedback should be made available publicly to have better and complete visibility of the application globally."
"There are sometimes leakages of viruses when the system is experiencing network failures."
"From time to time, the system's administrators notice the increase in the false-positive alerts being reported by CloudGuard SaaS."
"We have used technical support, but their response time is very slow. It needs to be improved."
"Some undefined threats can bypass the security system when there is a networking failure in the organization."
"The reports and graphs are unintuitive."
"Anything outside of the software vulnerability management and the CSM, things like the GhostPort, need some improvement. The dashboard is in beta. It looks really good, I wish it would come out of beta."
"In the CSM module the policies are really hard to work with it. It is not very flexible at all. I would suggest that they change that. Right now, the scan is based on the group that the server is in. What happens if the server is in multiple groups?"
"Of all the advertised functions, I only find two things that really work in my environment, even though I wanted to use all of them. They're not flexible enough to be used."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a fair price for what you get. We are happy with the price as it stands."
"PingSafe is less expensive than other options."
"Their pricing appears to be based simply on the number of accounts we have, which is common for cloud-based products."
"The features included in PingSafe justify its price point."
"PingSafe's pricing is good because it provides us with a solution."
"It's not expensive. The product is in its initial growth stages and appears more competitive compared to others. It comes in different variants, and I believe the enterprise version costs around $55 per user per year. I would rate it a five, somewhere fairly moderate."
"It is not that expensive. There are some tools that are double the cost of PingSafe. It is good on the pricing side."
"It was reasonable pricing for me."
"You can get CloudGuard as part of Infinity. When you do the solution through Infinity, it's a per user type of license cost."
"There are absolutely no additional costs to the standard licensing fees. One of the wonderful pieces is that CloudGuard SaaS is all-inclusive in its licensing. There's no a-la-carte functionality. You're getting 100 percent of the product for the licensing that you're paying."
"I rate the platform’s pricing a seven and a half."
"The product’s price is very high."
"The product is expensive compared to some competitors, especially for the SME segment."
"The pricing and licensing are always negotiable."
"Cost is the main concern that every customer takes into consideration, and Check Point always negotiates a price that is affordable."
"Usually, we pay for the licensing part on a yearly basis and not on a monthly basis. If Check Point's team is providing a good amount of discount, then it is very easy for us to select it since its competitors are also giving the best prices or best discounts."
"We also evaluated VMware NSX, but the pricing and features available in a CloudPassage implementation were decisive in deciding to go with CP."
"CloudPassage is a little bit on the expensive side. So my suggestion is that the company lower its price point a wee bit or sell modules, separate them in modules, because I only find two things that are useful to me, yet I pay for four or five modules. It didn't seem like it was a fair deal."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
5%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
When I joined my organization, I saw that PingSafe was already implemented. I started to use the tool's alerting feat...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Harmony Email & Office?
The product is expensive compared to some competitors, especially for the SME segment in India. On average, it's arou...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Harmony Email & Office?
We use the product to address core, perimeter, and administrative security requirements for firewalls within our envi...
What do you like most about Check Point Harmony Email & Office?
The product offers good and easy integration capabilities with other products.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
Check Point CloudGuard, Check Point CloudGuard SaaS , Check Point Harmony Email & Office
CloudPassage Halo
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Helvetia, Denham Capital, Daymark Solutions, Neopharm Group
Citrix
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs. CloudPassage and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.