AutoSys Workload Automation vs IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

AutoSys Workload Automation
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
79
Ranking in other categories
Workload Automation (6th)
IBM Tivoli Provisioning Man...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cluster Provisioning (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of AutoSys Workload Automation is 12.8%, down from 19.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager is 0.6%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

MB
Oct 11, 2023
A highly stable solution that can be used for batch processing and other automation-related things
I work as an engineer in an enterprise company. We have used AutoSys Workload Automation for a long time for batch processing and other automation things AutoSys Workload Automation has saved us a lot of time for batch processing and bad jobs. Earlier, if someone had an issue with the…
Use IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have information on the exact licensing cost of AutoSys Workload Automation because that's managed by the tools and financing teams. For agents, it's close to $4,00, but for the server setup, it's usually a one-time license initially, and it's AMC which is paid every year and comes close to $8,000 to $10,000."
"Validate how many agents you need beforehand."
"The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."
"There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."
"The return on investment would be very high because doing things manually without this product would be extremely expensive."
"The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."
"CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."
"We paid to use the solution monthly."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
46%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
7%
Insurance Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...
What do you like most about AutoSys Workload Automation?
The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE
Tivoli Provisioning Manager
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life
KPJ Healthcare Berhad, Keyword, Tennis Australia, Cxense ASA, SKIData AG, Unisys, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, RAVInvest, Odin, Chapman University, CloudHesive, Cima Solutions Group, Projetech, Grow Strategy
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: June 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.