Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs Rapid7 InsightVM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (25th)
Rapid7 InsightVM
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightVM is 16.1%, up from 14.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Unique Categories:
Vulnerability Management
1.6%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

AK
Mar 10, 2023
Reasonably priced with helpful quarterly reviews and excellent reporting
As far as the product is concerned, I would really like the scanning feature to let us know that a threat has been addressed once we apply the relevant patch. We are not seeing this currently when running a scan. We have about 1500 lines showing as open vulnerabilities, and I believe we have addressed quite a few of them. However, the scan process does not indicate that the vulnerability has been addressed. We have an open help desk ticket with Arctic Wolf to address this and hope to have a resolution soon. As mentioned earlier, the service is great, and we have no concerns in that area.
BR
Aug 12, 2022
Easy to deploy, scalable, and helps in prioritizing the risks with risk scoring
A big vulnerability was discovered last year for jshell. We got a lot of questions from our customers about which services are vulnerable. We could give an answer in just a few minutes to the customers and also warn them The risk score that they provide makes it easier to find out the biggest…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We have a patch management solution that scans for any patches that can be applied and then applies these patches, but it doesn't hit everything. It also doesn't find all misconfigurations and things like that. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk kind of fills in the gaps and makes us aware of vulnerabilities or misconfigurations that exist out there. It does an agent scan for software versions and compares them to what CVs are out there and lets us know."
"There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you to scan and patch the vulnerabilities. Any 50-member or small company that has an IT footprint carries risk from a cybersecurity perspective. These companies use tools but don't have the talent to leverage them."
"This solution has made huge strides in improving the awareness of our end users."
"We get access to quarterly reviews with their team."
"The most valuable feature of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is being informed about what vulnerabilities there are exposed currently."
"You can bring in and get online to do reports fairly quickly,"
"The performance is good."
"The solution works well."
"The most valuable feature for us is the different types of reporting it provides."
"It is a stable solution."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The most important aspect of the solution is that it rarely gives false positives, especially compared to other products. It provides very clear reports for our IT teams to look at."
"I have been in contact with technical support and they are not bad."
 

Cons

"The best way to take this product to the next level would be to implement a patch management solution."
"It could be easier to use. They could present things in a little bit more ranked order rather than kind of giving you everything out there. It should highlight the really important stuff and make it easier to get to good rather than perfect."
"Arctic Wolf Managed Risk needs to add more integrations."
"The scalability could improve."
"As far as the product is concerned, I would really like the scanning feature to let us know that a threat has been addressed once we apply the relevant patch. We are not seeing this currently when running a scan."
"There are not enough templates, and the reporting is weak with this solution."
"There is room for improvement on its cloud side. In the next release I would like to see better reporting."
"The solution needs to improve its vulnerability design to include CVC results."
"There needs to be much clearer instructions surrounding scanning."
"They should improve the cybersecurity feature of the solution."
"InsightVM could be improved by providing passive scanning as an option."
"The InsightVM cannot scan if we connect to our customer by the VPN."
"This solution creates false-positives which can cause issues with reporting."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonably priced and I rate it a four out of ten."
"It depends on the company size quite a bit."
"The price of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonable compared to the competition."
"The license is annual and this is the optimal approach when it comes to most software."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"It is pretty expensive. It depends on what you consider pricey, however, if you only look at vulnerability management solutions, such as within VM or VMDR, there are, I suppose the prices are almost the same. But I believe you will discover that for yourself."
"This solution is expensive, but it's fine for us as we have an open budget for security solutions. Protection and having the system secured is more important."
"Its price is too high. My only concern or issue with Rapid7 is its pricing."
"It is less expensive compared to other competitors."
"Comparing the price with the value that we receive, I am not happy with it."
"Its licensing is yearly. Everything is included in the price for one year."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Educational Organization
35%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?
There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you to scan and patch the vulnerabilities. Any 50-member or small company that has an...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonably priced and I rate it a four out of ten.
What needs improvement with Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk needs to add more integrations.
How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?
You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...
What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightVM?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 InsightVM?
The product is cheaper than the other similar tools available in the market.
 

Also Known As

No data available
InsightVM, NeXpose
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Zelle LLP, DNI Corp, Roper Pump, Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice
ACS, Acosta, AllianceData, amazon.com, biogen idec, CBRE, CATERPILLAR, Deloitte, COACH, GameStop, IBM
Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Rapid7 InsightVM and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.