Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

AgileCraft
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
19th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (13th)
TFS
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of AgileCraft is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TFS is 4.2%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Unique Categories:
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
0.1%
Test Management Tools
9.1%
 

Featured Reviews

TH
Oct 4, 2021
Linking of PI Objectives with different features was cool, but it didn't have integration with Jira
Jira didn't do the portfolio very well, so the use case was trying to do the work with multiple teams. Jira couldn't do that out of the box The linking of PI Objectives with different features was one of the cool things. It had features, epics, and stories out of the box.  It should just have…
SJ
May 5, 2023
Has good performance, but the initial setup process needs to be simpler
We use the solution to store all the code and designs for software version control The solution helps us store multiple software versions as it evolves and develops. All the essential functions of the solution perform well. The solution's pricing and setup process needs improvement. I have…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The linking of PI Objectives with different features was one of the cool things. It had features, epics, and stories out of the box."
"I feel that the test plan and test tools are more manageable in TFS."
"The most valuable feature of TFS is that it keeps the code secure while working collaboratively in a team of four or five individuals."
"The most valuable features are test case writing and bug tracking."
"The biggest value-add is the solution integrates well with most Microsoft products."
"What I like the most is that you can set permissions on just one folder."
"I like its MTM (Microsoft Test Manager) section which gives us options to create various test plans and add test cases into it."
"It has great functionality: work items, backlogs, source code, build releases, and it's easy to use."
"Version Control: TFS offers both the centralized “TFVC” version control technology as well as the distributed “Git” version control technology."
 

Cons

"It should just have the integration with Jira. We haven't looked at it since Atlassian bought the product."
"The reporting functionality is something that they should work on."
"One of the areas that could be improved is to have an effective full lifecycle management."
"Integration from Visual Studio could be improved."
"We encounter issues with backups."
"The program and portfolio planning facility can be improved."
"There are many things that I cannot do, and I have a lot of bugs."
"The user interface could be improved to make it simpler and increase usability."
"The project management side should be addressed and the project and release planning should be somewhat extended."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"If running TFS on-premise is expensive, maybe you could consider moving to the Cloud and use the Visual Studio Team Services."
"There are different prices depending on the configurations. There is a free version available. There is no extra cost for the solution. However, the hardware could be something that needs to be considered."
"I believe we pay on a yearly basis. I don't know the current costs of them. We outsource all that to a third party. Each of the developers gets a Microsoft Visual Studio Azure DevOps license, which gives them access to the TFS server as well. We probably pay on average about 1,800 Canadian Dollars a year for every developer, but that covers a lot more than just TFS."
"The overall price of TFS is good."
"We pay subscription fees on a yearly basis and the price is reasonable."
"TFS is on the higher side, but if you intend to use the tool as a complete ALM tool, it will reduce your costs in the long run."
"TFS is expensive, and the licensing costs are yearly. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"TFS is not cheap."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
32%
Government
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
53%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Which is better - TFS or Azure DevOps?
TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very fri...
What do you like most about TFS?
Microsoft's technical team is supportive.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TFS?
There is a yearly licensing fee that needs to be paid.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Team Foundation Server
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NCR, Primatics Financial, Ball, VSP, Equifax, Rent-A-Center, PBGC, Verint Systems, Amway
Vendex KBB IT Services, Info Support, Fujitsu Consulting, TCSC, Airways New Zealand, HP
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: June 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.