OpenText SiteScope vs Oracle Enterprise Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText SiteScope
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (27th)
Oracle Enterprise Manager
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
123
Ranking in other categories
Database Development and Management (1st), Server Monitoring (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.2%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Enterprise Manager is 0.3%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Database Development and Management
5.8%
Server Monitoring
7.7%
 

Featured Reviews

Ahmed  Sobhy - PeerSpot reviewer
May 11, 2023
Easy To Use with a very Good capabilities in monitoring the URLS and APIs
The Reports and dashboard in the solution are areas that need improvement. dashboarding has some limitations,when we're trying to create a performance dashboard on the OBM. we can't Export our reports on PDF or HTML Format , you have to access the Reports Directly from the SiteScope I think Reports and dashboards are area for improvements on the SiteScope. Also there is no Web UI for accessing and managing the SiteScope , you have to use the SiteScope Local Client . We have installed two SiteScope servers for managing 2 different sites ,it will be perfect if it has one management UI. I consider the Agentless technique is a Pros and corns in the same time as we have to open a lot of ports such like WMi , snmp and ping on all Monitored servers.
Brian Imambaks - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 9, 2023
Great for monitoring and reporting; does not crash
Our primary use case for this solution is for monitoring and reporting and emailing those back to the client When it comes to Enterprise Manager, we use single instances and price management. We install these in every installation of Oracle and then we manage them specifically for individual…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It can monitor over a 100 technologies with built-in solution templates."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText SiteScope is that it is easy to manage and user-friendly."
"For the system environment, SiteScope can be useful."
"It has multiple monitors that can be deployed OOTB, which includes basic system monitors for CPU, Disk, Memory, NIC's, etc."
"There's no agent you need installed on the servers. In our environment, we have some servers out of our control so we cannot manage them. We use SiteScope to monitor the availability, the resources on the servers, etc. This allows us to do this job without installing agents so there's no need to take care of anything on the server."
"VM monitoring is pretty good showing good visualizations of how VMs are operating within the context of all the VMs running on the same hypervisor."
"Infrastructure monitoring is the most valuable feature."
"Simplest tool for monitoring servers, web content, databases and other hardware. Its dashboard is really good."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager helps to control servers."
"The most valuable features are security and speed."
"It's easy to implement as it's made by Oracle for Oracle."
"It's user friendly."
"We can manage everything in our environment."
"Due to the infrastructure's size, the introduction they offer is very, very useful. It helps with an overall understanding of the product."
"We use it extensively for performance tuning testing, monitoring, and configuration."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Enterprise Manager are the data guide and online monitoring."
 

Cons

"They should provide more templates for new vendor devices."
"Full application functionality available via the API. There are some functions you can perform managing monitors, that are only available through the UI."
"It could be more reliable using a database repository instead of a log repository."
"They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files."
"It should improve its integrations with various tools, especially service management tools."
"We'd like a uniform interface for monitoring our system, since that's the purpose of SiteScope."
"More out of the box Cloud integration and capabilities."
"The graphs and dashboard in the solution are areas that need improvement."
"It is complicated to run it on Google Chrome."
"We would like to have a single dashboard for monitoring and controlling all of our products."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager's scalability is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The product is pretty comprehensive, but quite resource hungry. This might be due to the majority of the application seemingly being written in Java."
"They should improve the hover text context. This would provide assistance whenever a task is attempted by a DBA."
"I would say mostly backup and recovery, through the Enterprise Manager. Or any corruptions, to be able to fix them through Enterprise Manager."
"Patching. It's extremely difficult to determine what requires patching and the process to patch each component is slightly different."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
"Licensing is a little steep."
"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."
"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."
"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."
"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."
"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."
"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."
"Be careful to only enable the packs for which you have a license as this is an issue we see time and again."
"We are satisfied with the pricing."
"Evaluate your requirements carefully. Elaborate DR and HA setup of OEM can become expensive."
"The basic functions are free. You only pay license fees for advanced features."
"There is only the standard licensing fee. There are no other costs."
"I rate Oracle Enterprise Manager’s pricing a five out of ten."
"There are a few bugs with the software which require opening SRs with Oracle Support which contribute to the day-to-day cost. Perhaps 8 hours per month is spent dealing with support, just as a rough guess."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager is a free tool from Oracle."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
30%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
6%
Educational Organization
68%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
4%
Government
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
I would rate the pricing of SiteScope as a five out of ten in terms of costliness. It is not overly expensive, but there is room for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness in some areas.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
In terms of improvement, OpenText SiteScop could become a better solution by adding more monitoring templates, like RedScope, to make it easier to track specific technologies. It should also improv...
What do you like most about Oracle Enterprise Manager?
What I like most about Oracle Enterprise Manager are its features, particularly the active session history. It provides insights into SQL, and I use it regularly to identify potential issues.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Enterprise Manager?
As far as I know, you do not pay for Oracle Enterprise Manager separately. You can use Enterprise Manager for free if you already have an Oracle license for your database.
What needs improvement with Oracle Enterprise Manager?
Improving the integration speed would be beneficial, as the current Java-based system can sometimes result in slow responses. Enhancing performance overall would also be valuable.
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
7-Eleven, Halliburton, Cisco, Garmin, Nationwide, Korea Telecom, Allied Irish Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.