We performed a comparison between Oracle Enterprise Manager and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found the singular GUI feature very helpful. Fewer DBA resources can be allocated with Toad licenses."
"The tried and tested services that Oracle provides is second to none."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager helps to control servers."
"The most valuable feature is high availability."
"I like that it's stable."
"The single-pane and single interface in the centralized system is the most valuable feature."
"Due to the infrastructure's size, the introduction they offer is very, very useful. It helps with an overall understanding of the product."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Enterprise Manager are the data guide and online monitoring."
"Every new asset placed in the environment can be automatically detected, predicting human failures."
"The basic setup is very easy."
"The solution is open-source, easy to manage, and user-friendly making it easy for anyone to use."
"It meets my organizational needs. It's pretty easy to use."
"Zabbix is an excellent performance monitoring tool."
"The integration with third-party tools and the alerts are most valuable."
"The best thing about Zabbix is the integration and the APIs that are included are very fast"
"Zabbix is quite stable once it is set up. We haven't had any post-setup issues."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
"It needs to support the Database versions lower than 10.2."
"There's a lot of documentation to go through as a new user."
"RMAN tools need improvement."
"The deployment is not straightforward."
"Improving the integration speed would be beneficial, as the current Java-based system can sometimes result in slow responses."
"The interface offered by Oracle Enterprise Manager has certain shortcomings and needs improvement to become a nice tool."
"The solution's agents work with Java, and the Java code sometimes consumes a lot of memory on the CPU."
"I would like to remotely connect to the computer, and Zabbix doesn't have this capability."
"We would like to see the addition of automatic push functionality to this product. This would save time when monitoring our servers and networks as, at present, we have to manually install the Zabbix agent on any hardware to be monitored."
"The dashboard and the graph section could be a little bit more professional."
"Even though it’s such a powerful monitoring system, it would be more helpful if it had a flexible UI."
"Zabbix claims that there is an auto-discovery process but my team member was facing difficulty and was told that it's not really automatic, and there are some manual steps."
"I want Zabbix to improve the UX/UI. Zabbix doesn't use a JavaScript chart for images, and I want them to improve this."
"The user interface could be better."
"There is a bit of a learning curve during installation."
Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 123 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Server Monitoring with 101 reviews. Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Dynatrace, Quest Spotlight, AppDynamics, Quest Foglight for Databases and ServiceNow Discovery, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Lenovo XClarity Controller. See our Oracle Enterprise Manager vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.