GitLab vs Spinnaker comparison

GitLab and Spinnaker are both solutions in the Release Automation category. GitLab is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while Spinnaker is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.3. GitLab holds a 29.7% mindshare in RA, compared to Spinnaker’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Spinnaker users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 85 GitLab reviews

9,406 Views
470 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Spinnaker

Read 4 Spinnaker reviews

370 Views
114 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

GitLab

Spinnaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

GitLab and Spinnaker both operate within the software development category, focusing on continuous integration and deployment. GitLab holds an advantage with its comprehensive feature list and user-friendly interface, whereas Spinnaker specializes in complex deployments with multi-cloud capabilities.

Features: GitLab provides a robust integration for DevOps lifecycle management, including CI/CD pipelines, version control, and monitoring. It offers seamless automation and strong security features, making it versatile for various development tasks. Spinnaker specializes in application release orchestration with support for multi-cloud environments, providing flexibility in delivery strategies and advanced deployment patterns.

Room for Improvement: GitLab could enhance its capacity for complex deployment scenarios to match Spinnaker's strengths. Additionally, while its interface is user-friendly, more customizable options could benefit users with specific needs. Spinnaker might improve its initial setup process to make it more accessible, reducing technical barriers for new users. Further refinement in user interface and comprehensive documentation could also enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab is praised for its straightforward setup and smooth integration with both cloud-based and on-premise solutions. Its extensive documentation and active community support provide a solid customer service experience. Spinnaker, on the other hand, presents challenges in deployment due to complex setup requirements, yet its scalability and strong community support are notable.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab offers transparent pricing with tiered options that cater to different scales, leading to a rapid ROI given its ample integrated tools. Spinnaker, while free of licensing costs as an open-source platform, might incur higher initial setup costs due to its complexity. However, for long-term operations requiring sophisticated deployments, Spinnaker can provide significant ROI through its specialized efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Spinnaker Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Spinnaker

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,632 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Release Automation

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (10th), Build Automation (1st), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Spinnaker

Ranking in Release Automation

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of GitLab is 29.7%, down from 36.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spinnaker is 1.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Anurag Bandyopadhyay

Product Development Engineer at Razorpay

Useful to create custom pipelines

Regarding areas for improvement, one significant issue is the lack of maker-checker flows to ensure that newly created pipelines are accurate and tested. We currently use an in-house abstraction over Spinnaker to verify pipeline specs, environment variables, etc. It would be beneficial if Spinnaker could offer this functionality within their product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability is good."

"The user interface is really good so that helps with huge teams who need to collaborate."

"I have had no problem with the stability of the solution."

"It's a great toolbox where the CI/CD pipeline is the fundamental component, but there are so many other features that you can pull from, which makes it a very powerful tool. My current client is using AWS, and they can, of course, use AWS CodePipeline, but GitLab is much more mature than that, and it also gives you the freedom to decide to go to another platform or have a multi-cloud strategy and things like that. That freedom for me is also very valuable."

"CI/CD is valuable for me."

"The SaaS setup is impressive, and it has DAST solutioning."

"GitLab is being used as a repository for our codebase and it is a one stop DevOps tool we use in our team."

"The most valuable functionality of GitLab, for me, is the DevOps. Besides the normal source control based on Git, I find the Auto DevOps features most important in the solution."

More GitLab pros

"There is a good community around the product that makes troubleshooting possible."

"Spinnaker is used for automating a variety of deployment tasks, infrastructure, provisioning tasks, and all kinds of things."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its intuitive interface for converting existing Kubernetes specs into working pipelines. It's easy for anyone to deploy anything on any environment when they need to test or deploy for a specific merchant or use case. Instead of going into the specs and changing different variables, they can do it through the UI, which is very useful."

"The most valuable feature of Spinnaker is the rollback."

Cons

"The user interface could be more user-friendly. We do most of our operations through the website interface but it could be better."

"The solution could improve by providing more integration into the CI/CD pipeline, an autocomplete search tool, and more supporting documentation."

"Merge conflicts and repository maintenance could improve. If there is someone new to the system they would not know if there is a conflict."

"The self-hosted version of GitLab is not very stable when under load. It slows down and requires restarts every few days."

"The solution does not have many built-in functions or variables so scripting is required."

"GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly."

"In the next release, I would like to see GitLab expand its integration capabilities to include platforms like DigitalOcean, which developers widely use for cloud infrastructure. Enhancing CI/CD automation features specifically tailored for DigitalOcean would be beneficial."

"When deploying the solution on cloud and the CI/CD pipeline, we have to define the steps and it becomes confusing."

More GitLab cons

"Log-wise, we need to understand why something has failed so that we can understand and try to fix it the moment the issue is reported. The solution could use more robust monitoring."

"Spinnaker's configuration setup is too complicated and should be made easy."

"Every time it goes to run a pipeline, it just generates a lot of data, and its database is not exactly tuned out of the box, meaning it is not tuned for high scalability."

"Regarding areas for improvement, one significant issue is the lack of maker-checker flows to ensure that newly created pipelines are accurate and tested. We currently use an in-house abstraction over Spinnaker to verify pipeline specs, environment variables, etc. It would be beneficial if Spinnaker could offer this functionality within their product."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"My company uses the free version of GitLab, which is GitLab Community Edition. There is a licensed version also available for GitLab."

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

"GitLab is a free solution to use."

"We are using the free version of GitLab."

"GitLab's pricing is good compared to others on the market."

"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"The solution is open-source."

"Spinnaker is a free-to-use, open-source solution."

"Spinnaker is an open-source product. The tool is completely free for users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

11%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

One significant feature we lack is the configuration that enforces code reviews, which simplifies the development life cycle. Unfortunately, this is available only at a higher license level than we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Spinnaker?

The most valuable feature of Spinnaker is the rollback.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spinnaker?

The solution is open-source.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spinnaker?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 24% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 16% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 6% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Octopus Deploy vs Spinnaker

Compared 42% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Spinnaker

Compared 20% of the time

UrbanCode Deploy vs Spinnaker

Compared 13% of the time

More Spinnaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

June 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

June 2025

Download Spinnaker product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

No data available

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

Spinnaker provides application management and deployment to help you release software changes with high velocity and confidence. Spinnaker is an open-source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform that combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers. If you are looking to standardize your release processes and improve quality, Spinnaker is for you.

Spinnaker

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Spinnaker

June 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Spinnaker

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Spinnaker and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Spinnaker report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.