We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and GitLab based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The document generation features are valuable."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."
"The initial setup of the product is easy."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"We like that we can have an all-encompassing product and don't have to implement different solutions."
"I like GitLab from the CI/CD perspective. It is much easier to set up CI/CD and then integrate with other tools."
"The merging feature makes it easy later on for the deployment."
"This is a scalable solution. We had around 200 users working with it."
"The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good."
"The most valuable feature of GitLab is its security."
"This product is always evolving, and they listen to the customers."
"GitLab integrates well with other platforms."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"We'd like to see better integration with the Atlassian ecosystem."
"The tool should include a feature that helps to edit the code directly."
"I used Spring Cloud config and to connect that to GitLab was so hard."
"GitLab can improve by integrating with more tools, such as servers with Docker."
"GitLab could improve the patch repository. It does not have support for Conan patch version regions. Additionally, better support for Kubernetes deployment is needed as part of the package."
"I would like more Agile features in the Premium version. The Premium version should have all Agile features that exist in the Ultimate version. IBM AOM has a complete Agile implementation, but in GitLab, you only have these features if you buy the Ultimate version. It would be good if we can use these in the Premium version."
"GitLab's Windows version is yet not available and having this would be an improvement."
"We would like to generate document pages from the sources."
GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 10 reviews while GitLab is ranked 10th in Rapid Application Development Software with 70 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.4, while GitLab is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM, ServiceNow, Mendix and OutSystems, whereas GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, SonarQube, AWS CodePipeline and Veracode. See our GitHub CoPilot vs. GitLab report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.