Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Sophos UTM comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiGate
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
309
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (2nd), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (2nd), WAN Edge (1st)
Harmony SASE (formerly Peri...
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (5th), Firewalls (10th), Anti-Malware Tools (9th), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (7th), ZTNA as a Service (3rd), ZTNA (1st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (4th)
Sophos UTM
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
110
Ranking in other categories
Unified Threat Management (UTM) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Firewalls category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiGate is 22.6%, up from 20.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sophos UTM is 2.3%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Firewalls
Unique Categories:
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
21.5%
WAN Edge
24.4%
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
1.0%
Unified Threat Management (UTM)
24.7%
 

Featured Reviews

DE
Nov 23, 2023
Enables me to easily see the events and make a decision about next steps
The feature I like most is the SD-WAN. It allows you to manage more than one ISP at the same time. And there is a high-availability mode, so if one of your ISPs is down, you still have a backup. It also provides us with visibility because we are able to track the IP addresses, as well as the type of device, OS, vendor name, and the name of the devices. In addition, Fortinet Security Fabric helps us meet regulations and compliance requirements. The built-in APIs enable us to integrate with different vendors, such as TP-Link and Luigi. We did not have any problems with the integration. It's very easy to configure and connect. This helps reduce deployment time, but that has more to do with network knowledge than with the product. If you're familiar with basic networking, it would be easy for you to understand the application of a certain device and integrate it with the API of your choice.
LP
Apr 25, 2023
Secure, allows for remote connectivity, and helps with productivity
A Google Chrome extension would be handy instead of logging into the app. That way, it's pre-signed in and ready to go while browsing. While the app connects as we log in, it would be helpful to be able to stay signed in and have an automatic connection while browsing. The connection may be faster and stronger that way as well. A VPN Extention through the web browser would be a great asset to web users and companies. With a one-time login, we can have access and not worry about reconnecting to the VPN. I'm looking forward to seeing this feature.
AlaaMady - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 20, 2022
A useable solution for small businesses who are willing to rely on cloud-based, centralized management of the software
We use it as an internet firewall, and as our web application firewall I don't believe it has improved our organization; I don't actually like the product because of the features it is missing. I would like this solution to support ICAP. Also, they no longer support on-premises management, and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's a user-friendly firewall. Most of the tasks are very simple. It's simple to configure and troubleshoot this firewall."
"The SD-WAN feature is the most valuable. This feature evolved from link load balancing. It has helped us in terms of our uptime and privatizing applications whenever we experience an outage. The SD-WAN feature has been a plus for us. Two-factor authentication has allowed us to add more users in terms of remote working. We have two-factor authentication for remote workers to authenticate them before they get on the network."
"The most valuable features are SD-WAN, application control, IPS control, and FortiSandbox."
"The solution is highly scalable because they have devices that can handle a large amount of traffic."
"Advanced routing (RIP, OSPF, BGP, PBR). It gives you a seamless and simple integration into a large network."
"The product is very stable, easy to troubleshoot, and configure, so it has reduced the time it takes for support."
"Its stability is the most valuable."
"It is simple to manage, and there are a lot of functionalities in the same box."
"The tool's implementation marks a significant step forward among our enterprise clients, showcasing our commitment to staying ahead in the rapidly evolving landscape of blockchain technology. The robust security measures implemented not only protect the integrity of financial transactions but also contribute to maintaining the trust and credibility of our clientele."
"The DRP is the most valuable feature."
"Providing access and security allows our company employees to work from home and remotely."
"HTTPS decryption is a valuable service and not always found in cloud-based secure web gateways."
"The characteristics that I have liked the most are the ease of implementation and administration."
"Our operators can work from home without any problems."
"The scalability is good, and I'd give it an eight out of ten."
"It keeps us all accountable and ensures secure internet connections while we all work remotely."
"It makes it a lot easier for us to maintain things. Prior to it, things were more difficult. This means less time on us. We can focus on other things. The recovery is more in man-hours for us than anything else."
"Technical support is very responsive."
"The isolation of infected machines is a big feature. Also, the ability to detect external sources that change files on a file server is really big."
"The most valuable features of the solution are application filtering and web filtering."
"The three most important features for us are web protection, web server protection, and network protection."
"With Sophos, we have not had any incidents this year. The security provided has been good. It has proven to be okay for our needs."
"The firewall itself is very strong and provides great security."
"It has helped by identifying threats within the company. If there are computers or servers that are compromised, then we are able to identify them right away in the system."
 

Cons

"The performance and speed are aspects of the solution that could always be improved upon."
"You do need some IT knowledge in order to effectively work with the solution."
"The logs need to be better. They need to be more visible and easier to access."
"The solution could have licensing fees reduced in the future."
"It would be ideal if they had some sort of GUI interface for troubleshooting and diagnostics."
"With the reports, you can see it, and you can get good feelings so upper management can go, "Oh, wow. That looks pretty." However, it's very basic."
"The stability of Fortinet FortiGate could improve."
"Its reporting can be improved. Sometimes, I don't get proper reports."
"Support is one of the points of improvement."
"The platform still lacks relevant dashboards and the ability to customize them based on our needs."
"As it is a new market solution, I still face some instabilities in access at certain times of the day when I have more than 150 users using it simultaneously."
"They should work towards the WAN intergration."
"There is an issue when installing the Check Point client."
"The tool could be more user-friendly."
"In order to have to bypass the login using the website, a good feature for Perimeter 81 to have is a login instance in the Perimeter 81 application. I'm using a Mac and we don't have that functionality."
"I have found that the log-in/out process takes quite some time."
"I would like to see Sophos UTM add support for all the new threat-detection technologies and the ability to respond to novel security threats that come along every day."
"The solution needs better integration with captive portals and XGs."
"We had some problems with the configuration. They had provided a CloudFormation template, and we had to go several rounds to make it work."
"​This product could use some improvement with web filtering. It takes a lot of time and effort to set up and maintain.​"
"The technical support team’s response time could be improved."
"The support could be better."
"Updates come out agonizingly slowly, a trickle."
"The logs are not clear, which means that you need an additional piece of software in order to read them clearly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do not have first-hand experience with the rice of Fortinet FortiGate, but I have heard the price was reasonable."
"If the customer is looking for SD-WAN, it comes free with FortiGate."
"The pricing is justified. It's a little pricey, but what you pay for is what you get."
"The pricing is fair."
"When you look at these end security systems and firewalls, these firewalls even five years ago were $50,000 or perhaps $25,000 to implement in some types of customer sites. Now we're talking about tools that are $1,000. In this case, it might have been $500 or something like that."
"We have the full license that included all of the features and support."
"Its price could be better."
"In terms of the market, it's not a cheap product, but it's cost-effective."
"I would rate Harmony Connect's pricing at six out of ten. It wasn't particularly expensive, but it wasn't super cheap either."
"Perimeter 81 charges separately for gateways and VPN connectivity, but compared to Azure, it seemed more reasonable."
"The cost of the solution's licenses depends on the particular use cases."
"The product's pricing model accommodates diverse needs and deployment sizes."
"Overall I am very happy with the solution’s flexibility and pricing."
"I consider the product to be a medium-priced solution. There are no additional costs attached to the tool."
"The pricing is good, especially when you compare it to other firewall or UTM solutions from FortiGate or SonicWall, where you would have to invest about four hundred thousand rupees for 100 users over a three-year period."
"The solution is priced appropriately considering its uses. For an essential license, a user pays only 30 USD per month. For an enterprise version, the prices can be negotiated with the company."
"Pricing for Sophos UTM is OK. Here in Egypt, many companies use the solution because of its price and features. My company pays the Sophos UTM license fee yearly."
"Sophos UTM is moderately priced, but it could be improved."
"We originally purchased the solution through the AWS Marketplace. I started my proof of concept doing pay-as-you-go, then moved to a VAR for a 'Bring Your Own Licence' (BYOL) licensing model. The BYOL license still requires you to accept the terms of the AWS Marketplace to deploy."
"I have no problem with the cost or licensing of this solution. This is a primary reason whay I wanted this solution. It does the same thing cheaper than other name brands."
"It's expensive. It has a yearly license."
"There was an up-front charge of around $70,000, to purchase the hub and license. Beyond the initial cost, licenses are charged for annually, but they are good value for the service we receive."
"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace is pretty straightforward. Because were entirely on AWS and don't have anything anywhere else. It made the most sense for us as a one stop shop."
"We purchased the appliance with five years onsite support and licenses."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user216600 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 3, 2016
Sophos UTM vs. Fortinet FortiGate
I have used both Sophos and Fortinet products in production and I have found the Sophos UTM appliances (hardware and virtual) to be a better fit most of the time -- with a few caveats which I will touch on below. In both instances, the transition from TMG will be mostly straightforward. The main…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
21%
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Security Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is the better NGFW: Fortinet Fortigate or Cisco Firepower?
When you compare these firewalls you can identify them with different features, advantages, practices and usage a...
What is the biggest difference between Sophos XG and FortiGate?
From my experience regarding both the Sophos and FortiGate firewalls, I personally would rather use FortiGate. I know...
What are the biggest technical differences between Sophos UTM and Fortinet FortiGate?
As a solution, Sophos UTM offers a lot of functionality, it scales well, and the stability and performance are quite ...
What do you like most about Perimeter 81?
Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perimeter 81?
It's essential to consider the organization's specific requirements and budget. Here are some general recommendations...
What needs improvement with Perimeter 81?
In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed...
What Is The Biggest Difference Between Sophos UTM and Sophos XG?
The Sophos UTM is a UTM and Sophos XG is the NGFW. First, you must know about the difference between a UTM and NGFW. ...
What do you like most about Sophos UTM?
The most valuable feature of Sophos UTM is the endpoint protection feature.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos UTM?
You cannot really say that the solution is expensive, given the protection it gives.
 

Also Known As

FortiGate 60b, FortiGate 60c, FortiGate 80c, FortiGate 50b, FortiGate 200b, FortiGate 110c, FortiGate
Check Point Quantum SASE
Astaro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Amazon Web Services 2. Microsoft 3. IBM 4. Cisco 5. Dell 6. HP 7. Oracle 8. Verizon 9. AT&T 10. T-Mobile 11. Sprint 12. Vodafone 13. Orange 14. BT Group 15. Telstra 16. Deutsche Telekom 17. Comcast 18. Time Warner Cable 19. CenturyLink 20. NTT Communications 21. Tata Communications 22. SoftBank 23. China Mobile 24. Singtel 25. Telus 26. Rogers Communications 27. Bell Canada 28. Telkom Indonesia 29. Telkom South Africa 30. Telmex 31. Telia Company 32. Telkom Kenya
Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith
One Housing Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Sophos UTM and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.