Cisco Web Security Appliance vs Fortinet FortiGate SWG comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Lookout
Sponsored
Ranking in Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
24th
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Data Protection (7th), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (12th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (18th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (43rd), Mobile Threat Defense (2nd), ZTNA as a Service (13th), ZTNA (10th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (18th)
Cisco Web Security Appliance
Ranking in Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
9th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Fortinet FortiGate SWG
Ranking in Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category, the mindshare of Lookout is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Web Security Appliance is 3.3%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiGate SWG is 8.1%, up from 7.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
Unique Categories:
Mobile Data Protection
7.1%
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)
0.8%
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

AP
May 23, 2023
User-focused design makes it easy to understand, and operations running in background provide peace of mind
In any of the discussions that we've had with their technical teams, they have been very knowledgeable and helpful in certain aspects. They have a lot of partnerships, from what we can tell, and that does start to make the waters a little bit murky. They have third parties that provide functionality and there is a concern that we're going to be bounced around between five different groups to get help for a problem. If you describe it incorrectly, all of a sudden you're with a group that can't help you and they have to forward you to another group. They have been very responsive and super helpful when it comes to any of the issues we've identified. Still, that concern about being bounced around between multiple partners detracts from the overall experience.
Muhammad Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 6, 2022
Easy to use with good pre-defined categories and good reliability
It should have a user-based quota, per-user quota, that can be defined on the appliance. That way, if a user reaches their quota individually, they should be blocked for the next day. One major feature that is still not in this product and that should be implemented by Cisco is that it should have a live graph. We'd like to see, for example: What is the user consumption at the right now? What is the bandwidth, when bandwidth is used by the user? There is no current graph of it and I would recommend it should be in the product.
Crewmem67 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 1, 2022
Reliable, great pricing, and capable of expanding
This is a Secure Web Gateway that protects you against various web attacks. It's used mainly for security purposes.  The solution is stable. It's reliable.  It can scale.  The pricing on offer is excellent. It takes a long time to install the solution. It could always be more secure.  I've been…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"On the outside, the main differentiation is because Lookout ingest. They have ingested basically all of the apps for the last ten years and all the versions of all the apps, and we have that in a corporate database that allows us to do very large-scale machine learning and analysis on that data set. That's not something that any of the competitors really have the capability to do because they don't have access to the data set. A lot of the apps you can no longer get them because that version of the app is five or six years old, and it just doesn't exist anywhere anymore, except within our infrastructure. So, the ability to have that very rich dataset and learn from that dataset is a real differentiator."
"The most valuable features are the antivirus as a whole, the anti-malware, and all of the protection features that scan our enterprise devices."
"The protection offered by the product is the most valuable feature. It detects vulnerabilities or traps on our users' phones and then prompts them to clean up their devices. Tools we used previously would only discover, which required us to gather information on the backend, so Lookout is a welcome upgrade."
"The solution is stable."
"The best feature of Cisco Web Security Appliance is its policy framing. It also has a good UI and it can handle traffic well. Cisco Web Security Appliance is a good product."
"I would recommend this solution to others."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Great for assisting with connections to networks or apps."
"Since working with the tool, we have not found any threats in our organization."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco Web Security Appliance is the provided anti-malware functionality and URL categorization. I can block access to malicious websites. 99 percent of the cases are related to a malicious website. If I cannot browse those malicious websites, then we are 99 percent protected."
"The tool has good Umbrella DNS security."
"Cisco is the best in giving technical support. There is no doubt about that."
"It offers web filtering capabilities at a more affordable price compared to other solutions like PSMs or NETGEAR."
"Web filters, particularly web application controls, grant us the ability to regulate user access effectively."
"The product's most valuable features are SD-WAN and the integration of WiFi and switches."
"The overall features of Fortinet FortiGate SWG are good."
"The interface and other reports are all user-friendly."
"We have found the product to be scalable."
"I am content with its user interface and functionalities."
"FortiGate is easy to configure. We configured one of the units and sent it to Indiana to be installed. We asked them to give us a call when they got it, so we could help them through the process, but they called us back to tell us it works great."
 

Cons

"We just submitted an enhancement request reflecting the main area we want to see improvement in; the APIs. Currently, we're able to build dashboards, but it's somewhat backward because we use our MDM API to create them. Lookout should provide API to customers so we can query our data and use it in our cloud, and this is the only outstanding area for improvement with the product right now."
"Lookout was moving into the SSE space. And so their work on SecureWeb Gateway and SD-WAN is still sort of evolving."
"The stability depends on the service from where you access it. Because sometimes, the place you are in, you have Gateway. You don't have Gateway. The gateway is overutilized. At the end, you need to go through their gateways. And this is the key point here. You have a tracking point. If it's not well orchestrated, and it scales up as you add more to the existing team, you will suffer"
"From the analysis that we've done, they do seem to be maybe a step behind in trying to enter the market with a new solution. But when they do pick up, they do come out with some good products."
"If a user wants to use it for other devices like mobile or smartphones, this product isn't so reliable."
"The licensing model needs to be more flexible."
"Cisco lacks a GUI-based troubleshooting feature compared to products by other vendors."
"The solution is not very compatible with other products."
"There are certain shortcomings related to the product's management capabilities, where improvements are required. The solution needs to provide better management of the category of web pages."
"It should have a user-based quota, per-user quota, that can be defined on the appliance."
"The solution needs to be more user-friendly and easier to navigate."
"The GUI is not user-friendly, so it needs to improve or be simplified."
"The graphical user interface of Fortinet FortiGate SWG is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The initial setup is medium complex and takes between five days and a week."
"Fortinet FortiGate SWG could improve the price, it is expensive."
"Fortinet FortiGate SWG should be localised to specific regions to comply with local data privacy regulations because of the data privacy rules in the countries. In the Middle East, data organisation and KFA requirements are stringent."
"One area of improvement I've noticed is the lack of built-in monitoring capabilities in the firewall. Currently, we rely on third-party solutions for monitoring purposes. However, I believe the firewall itself has the potential to do a better job in this aspect. Another aspect of Fortinet that concerns me is related to redundancy. We have a setup with two firewalls working in parallel, which requires a highly adaptable configuration. However, it feels unfair that clients need to purchase two licenses, especially when one of the firewalls serves as a backup. We have noticed that other manufacturers have different policies on this matter."
"Their technical support could be improved a little bit in terms of responsiveness."
"The solution has many heightened points which we cannot get to without working on CLI."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair; it's comparable to our previous solution, and we carried out multiple POCs and POVs (proof of value). The product is worth the money we pay for it."
"Lookout is definitely on the lower end when it comes to price point and that seems to be the only differentiator. The technology is in place in this space and it's really about who is coming in at the better price point now."
"The licensing costs are good. Prisma has much more options and support for security, but it has a higher cost. For example, Lookout costs 2/3rd of Prisma's licensing price."
"In terms of feature performance versus cost, they're a good value."
"I rate Cisco WSA a seven out of ten since it is costly."
"The solution's cost depends on how many users you purchase. It was maybe $3 or $5 per user, which is a bit expensive."
"The tool's licensing is yearly."
"When you compare the price of this solution to the price of FortiGate, it's high."
"Licensing fees are based on the number of users."
"I rate Cisco WSA a seven out of ten since it is costly."
"I rate the product price a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
"The licensing options begin with 100 users and this is a high threshold for smaller networks."
"I rate FortiGate's pricing a five out of ten."
"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
"The solution is cheap."
"I rate the product's pricing a seven out of ten. Its one-year license cost is competitive with three and five-year licenses offered by other products."
"It is around $50,000 per month."
"I rate the price of Fortinet FortiGate SWG a seven and a half out of ten since it is not a cheap solution, though I feel it is a good product for the money one pays."
"It is less expensive than a Cisco solution."
"The product is expensive compared to one of its competitors."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions are best for your needs.
789,135 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Non Profit
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lookout?
The licensing costs are good. Prisma has much more options and support for security, but it has a higher cost. For ex...
What needs improvement with Lookout?
The solution could improve identity integration as well. Zero trust, it's a good start as a zero-trust solution. More...
What do you like most about Cisco Web Security Appliance?
The most valuable features of the solution are the functions of proxy for the users who use the internet and the secu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Web Security Appliance?
I rate the product price a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price.
What needs improvement with Cisco Web Security Appliance?
The solution could provide seamless integration with other technologies. Cisco's strength lies in its reliable manage...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiGate SWG?
The interface and other reports are all user-friendly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiGate SWG?
The renewable is lower because the market doesn’t accept it publicly.
 

Also Known As

CipherCloud
Cisco WSA, Cisco Web Security
FortiGate SWG, FortiGate Secure Web Gateway
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Caixa Seguradora
Salt Lake County, Catholic College Bendigo, Azienda Unita Sanitaria
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Web Security Appliance vs. Fortinet FortiGate SWG and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
789,135 professionals have used our research since 2012.