A10 Thunder TPS vs Sucuri comparison

A10 Networks and Sucuri Security are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. A10 Networks is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Sucuri Security is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. A10 Networks holds a 2.0% mindshare in DDOS, compared to Sucuri Security’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of A10 Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sucuri Security users who would recommend it.

A10 Thunder TPS

Read 15 A10 Thunder TPS reviews

808 Views
808 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sucuri

Read 6 Sucuri reviews

1,091 Views
546 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

A10 Thunder TPS

Sucuri

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Sucuri and A10 Thunder TPS are essential players in the cybersecurity sector, focusing on website security and DDoS protection, respectively. Sucuri leads with competitive pricing and customer support, while A10 Thunder TPS is favored for its extensive features, ideal for those prioritizing high-level protection capabilities.

Features: Sucuri provides threat detection, malware cleanup, and continuous monitoring, making it effective for small to medium businesses seeking comprehensive website security. A10 Thunder TPS offers advanced DDoS protection through scalable mitigation strategies, comprehensive traffic analytics, and robust automated defenses using RESTful API.

Room for Improvement: Sucuri could improve its advanced threat analytics and scalability to accommodate larger enterprises. Enhanced automation for complex threats would also benefit its feature set. A10 Thunder TPS may focus on simplifying deployment processes and reducing initial setup complexity. Additional integration features could increase flexibility for various infrastructures, while its pricing model could be more accessible for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sucuri is recognized for easy deployment via plugin integration or DNS changes, supported by responsive customer service. A10 Thunder TPS, requiring complex deployments like dedicated hardware or cloud configurations, offers robust customer support tailored for enterprise clients. Sucuri's straightforward deployment suits businesses lacking extensive IT resources, while A10 Thunder TPS demands more technical expertise.

Pricing and ROI: Sucuri's affordable pricing plans provide a quick ROI, appealing to small businesses seeking cost-effective security solutions. A10 Thunder TPS involves higher setup costs with potentially substantial ROI, justified by its ability to protect critical infrastructure and deliver detailed threat analytics. Although Sucuri's pricing accommodates a broad client range, A10 Thunder TPS's investment is ideal for organizations requiring exceptional protection.

To learn more, read our detailed A10 Thunder TPS vs. Sucuri Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

A10 Thunder TPS vs. Sucuri

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,825 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

A10 Thunder TPS

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sucuri

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (24th), Domain Name System (DNS) Security (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of A10 Thunder TPS is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sucuri is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

RonaldoDE Melo

Sales Account Executive at L8 Group

Useful for protecting and supporting users against attacks

One problem for me with A10 Thunder TPS is that the box comes from another country in Brazil. In the tool, there is no one key to block it. For example, in F5 Networks, we have a key. If you try to buy another box from Huawei or from F5 and try to enable them in A10 Thunder TPS, you need a key to do it. The problem here is when you buy another box from A10, they want to put Thunder TPS to run, and it works okay, after which we cannot block it for another solution to be used, which is a problem for me where improvements are needed.

Read full review

Akshit Malik

Junior Associate - IT at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Provides website security, safeguarding against various threats and effective protection against DDoS attacks

The initial setup is moderate because it's neither too easy nor too hard. Sucuri provides us with many ways to set up our site, handle the routing, and perform the necessary configurations. It's deployed on the cloud. We used the managed service of Sucuri and then routed all the requests from Sucuri to our AWS platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase is very simple."

"The solution's support is one of the coolest things about the product. I"

"The primary benefit that we see from their systems is that their filtering technology has the ability to detect and drop the malicious traffic from the legitimate traffic with a high success rate. That, in combination with the very small effort needed to manage their systems, are the two most important benefits to us."

"Thunder TPS has automated mitigation and fully managed support in case the device cannot handle the attack. They have engineers available to respond."

"The most valuable feature of A10 Thunder TPS is load balancing."

"The solution has reduced the amount of manual intervention required during an attack. We have the inline solution and when it comes to the customers that we have on it, it has saved us some troubleshooting time."

"They give us the ability to configure many features for DDoS. There are many items that we can use."

"We selected the solution because of its programmable automated defense using RESTful API. We didn't want to connect to the box. We wanted to be able to do some automation. We wanted to have our own portal because we wanted to connect our customers to our own UI using the A10 API. It has been good and exactly what we need."

More A10 Thunder TPS pros

"I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server."

"The initial setup was very easy."

"The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization."

"It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website."

"The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use."

"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing."

Cons

"The last issue we had to contact them about was just a question of a false-positive. The A10 system wasn't supposed to decide what is a false-positive. So if we send it good traffic, it's supposed to just pass that good traffic through. But we opened this last ticket because the A10 did block some of the good traffic. Their support had to tweak it a little bit, but it wasn't anything that took a long time."

"The solution is a little expensive."

"It is very difficult to implement. It should be made a bit easier to implement. There is also a lack of resources on the internet. They need to develop more resources."

"I had issues with the user interface because, when putting settings up, the system asked me for strange things like virtual local networks that I didn't create."

"The problem here is when you buy another box from A10, they want to put Thunder TPS to run, and it works okay, after which we cannot block it for another solution to be used, which is a problem for me where improvements are needed."

"Its documentation could be better."

"The solution needs improvement in terms of fail-open."

"They have a cloud scrubbing feature that redirects the traffic if the on-prem appliance can't accommodate a large amount of traffic but it's not available where we are."

More A10 Thunder TPS cons

"In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there."

"It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance."

"I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything."

"Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section."

"Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives."

"The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive. If one is low price and ten is expensive, I rate the tool's price as a ten."

"We had a customer who was down for six hours and the loss of revenue for him was three times the price he was paying for us per year. The customer just said, "I don't care about paying you because on only one attack I saved money. It's three times better than losing money.""

"Pricing was much higher with Arbor (APS) for the same type of solution."

"We may need to pay fifty percent more if we purchase other solutions. For the payments made to A10 Thunder TPS, we have received three-year support."

"The financials are always a challenge with this type of technology. That's not really a product-functionality thing but it's the area where we push A10 the most."

"Pricing is very reasonable."

"We did a price survey, and compared to other solutions, A10 Thunder TPS wasn't cheap."

"It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."

"Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."

"I’d simply say it’s really worth it."

"The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

33%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

Government

Educational Organization

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about A10 Thunder TPS?

The most valuable feature of A10 Thunder TPS is load balancing.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for A10 Thunder TPS?

I have not seen specific prices, like $10,000 or $20,000. A frustrating aspect is the lack of demo versions. The vendor insists on commercial licenses despite requests for demo licenses. The global...

See all answers

What needs improvement with A10 Thunder TPS?

I had issues with the user interface because, when putting settings up, the system asked me for strange things like virtual local networks that I didn't create. For example, I set an NTP server, an...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sucuri?

The initial setup was very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sucuri?

The pricing is very reasonable. Sucuri offer other features as an add-on, such as backup, but these have an additional cost. We host the sites ourselves, so I don't take it because it was redundant.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sucuri?

The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection. In future releases, perhaps Sucuri could...

See all answers

Comparisons

Arbor DDoS vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 51% of the time

Radware DDoS vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 14% of the time

Cloudflare vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 13% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM) vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiDDoS vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 7% of the time

More A10 Thunder TPS Competitors

Cloudflare vs Sucuri

Compared 48% of the time

SiteLock vs Sucuri

Compared 18% of the time

AWS WAF vs Sucuri

Compared 15% of the time

Imperva DDoS vs Sucuri

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Sucuri

Compared 8% of the time

More Sucuri Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

A10 Thunder TPS

July 2025

Download A10 Thunder TPS product report

Buyer's Guide

Sucuri

June 2025

Download Sucuri product report

Overview

The Thunder TPS is a family of high-performance DDoS defense solutions that detect and mitigate multi-vector DDoS attacks. Unlike traditional DDoS defenses that leave a wake of collateral damage against users, Thunder TPS applies a source-based defense-in-depth mitigation pipeline. This multimodal defense that includes actionable DDoS weapons intelligence, operator definable adaptive policies, and machine learning-powered Zero-Day Automated Protection (ZAP) blocks attackers while protecting real users.

The Thunder TPS is uniquely suited for communication service providers, online gaming, and enterprise network operators who protect large networks and need compact solutions with faster response from a fully automated, zero-touch defense during an attack.

A10 Networks

Sucuri gives website owners peace of mind with solutions that prevent hackers from abusing websites, and professional response services to those compromised. Sucuri is dedicated to researching the latest and emerging threats affecting websites like yours. Website security should be attainable for all website owners; we focus on making that a reality. Get back to running awesome WordPress websites. Our services are built around three principles – People. Process. Technology.

Sucuri Security

Sample Customers

DDoS defense solution trusted for more than 200 service providers, online gaming, and enterprises including; Bungie, Comcast, KDDI Corporation, Leaseweb, Microsoft Azure, NTT Docomo, Softbank, Turkcell Superonline, Verizon and more.

The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World

Buyer's Guide

A10 Thunder TPS vs. Sucuri

June 2025

Free Report: A10 Thunder TPS vs. Sucuri

Find out what your peers are saying about A10 Thunder TPS vs. Sucuri and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our A10 Thunder TPS vs. Sucuri report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.